Cargando…

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made Glenoid Components: A Systematic Review

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty presents itself sometimes as challenging when it comes to addressing massive bone loss, either in primary or revision settings. Custom components recently have made their way into shoulder prosthetics and are meant to help in the case of extensive glenoid bone des...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gruber, Michael Stephan, Schwarz, Tamara, Lindorfer, Marlene, Rittenschober, Felix, Bischofreiter, Martin, Hochreiter, Josef, Ortmaier, Reinhold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36555886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247268
_version_ 1784857270774923264
author Gruber, Michael Stephan
Schwarz, Tamara
Lindorfer, Marlene
Rittenschober, Felix
Bischofreiter, Martin
Hochreiter, Josef
Ortmaier, Reinhold
author_facet Gruber, Michael Stephan
Schwarz, Tamara
Lindorfer, Marlene
Rittenschober, Felix
Bischofreiter, Martin
Hochreiter, Josef
Ortmaier, Reinhold
author_sort Gruber, Michael Stephan
collection PubMed
description Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty presents itself sometimes as challenging when it comes to addressing massive bone loss, either in primary or revision settings. Custom components recently have made their way into shoulder prosthetics and are meant to help in the case of extensive glenoid bone destruction. Because of strict indication and the fairly recent introduction of these implants, the usage of custom-made glenoid implants is not very common yet. However, the early results are promising. The purpose of this review was to summarize and analyze the available literature. Therefore, a systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of the databases PubMed, Cochrane, and Livivo was performed to screen for studies reporting on clinical and radiological outcomes of custom glenoid implants. Four studies with a total of 46 shoulders were included in this review. The mean patient age was 68.8 years and the mean time of follow-up was 24.3 months. The weighted means showed an increase in CMS (32.7 points), in ASES (39.8 points), in anteversion (67.4 degrees), and in abduction (51.9 degrees) and a decrease in VAS (5.4 points). Custom-made glenoid implants are therefore a viable option in cases of large combined glenoid bone loss, both in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9782147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97821472022-12-24 Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made Glenoid Components: A Systematic Review Gruber, Michael Stephan Schwarz, Tamara Lindorfer, Marlene Rittenschober, Felix Bischofreiter, Martin Hochreiter, Josef Ortmaier, Reinhold J Clin Med Systematic Review Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty presents itself sometimes as challenging when it comes to addressing massive bone loss, either in primary or revision settings. Custom components recently have made their way into shoulder prosthetics and are meant to help in the case of extensive glenoid bone destruction. Because of strict indication and the fairly recent introduction of these implants, the usage of custom-made glenoid implants is not very common yet. However, the early results are promising. The purpose of this review was to summarize and analyze the available literature. Therefore, a systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of the databases PubMed, Cochrane, and Livivo was performed to screen for studies reporting on clinical and radiological outcomes of custom glenoid implants. Four studies with a total of 46 shoulders were included in this review. The mean patient age was 68.8 years and the mean time of follow-up was 24.3 months. The weighted means showed an increase in CMS (32.7 points), in ASES (39.8 points), in anteversion (67.4 degrees), and in abduction (51.9 degrees) and a decrease in VAS (5.4 points). Custom-made glenoid implants are therefore a viable option in cases of large combined glenoid bone loss, both in primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty. MDPI 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9782147/ /pubmed/36555886 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247268 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Gruber, Michael Stephan
Schwarz, Tamara
Lindorfer, Marlene
Rittenschober, Felix
Bischofreiter, Martin
Hochreiter, Josef
Ortmaier, Reinhold
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made Glenoid Components: A Systematic Review
title Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made Glenoid Components: A Systematic Review
title_full Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made Glenoid Components: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made Glenoid Components: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made Glenoid Components: A Systematic Review
title_short Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made Glenoid Components: A Systematic Review
title_sort clinical and radiological outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty using custom-made glenoid components: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36555886
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247268
work_keys_str_mv AT grubermichaelstephan clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesaftertotalshoulderarthroplastyusingcustommadeglenoidcomponentsasystematicreview
AT schwarztamara clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesaftertotalshoulderarthroplastyusingcustommadeglenoidcomponentsasystematicreview
AT lindorfermarlene clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesaftertotalshoulderarthroplastyusingcustommadeglenoidcomponentsasystematicreview
AT rittenschoberfelix clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesaftertotalshoulderarthroplastyusingcustommadeglenoidcomponentsasystematicreview
AT bischofreitermartin clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesaftertotalshoulderarthroplastyusingcustommadeglenoidcomponentsasystematicreview
AT hochreiterjosef clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesaftertotalshoulderarthroplastyusingcustommadeglenoidcomponentsasystematicreview
AT ortmaierreinhold clinicalandradiologicaloutcomesaftertotalshoulderarthroplastyusingcustommadeglenoidcomponentsasystematicreview