Cargando…

Cardiovascular autonomic modulation differences between moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval aerobic training in women with PCOS: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) is strongly recommended for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) treatment. However, recent studies have suggested that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) would promote great benefits for cardiac autonomic control. Therefore, we investigat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Philbois, Stella V., Ribeiro, Victor B., Tank, Jens, dos Reis, Rosana Maria, Gerlach, Darius A., Souza, Hugo C. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1024844
_version_ 1784857345337065472
author Philbois, Stella V.
Ribeiro, Victor B.
Tank, Jens
dos Reis, Rosana Maria
Gerlach, Darius A.
Souza, Hugo C. D.
author_facet Philbois, Stella V.
Ribeiro, Victor B.
Tank, Jens
dos Reis, Rosana Maria
Gerlach, Darius A.
Souza, Hugo C. D.
author_sort Philbois, Stella V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) is strongly recommended for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) treatment. However, recent studies have suggested that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) would promote great benefits for cardiac autonomic control. Therefore, we investigated whether the benefits of HIIT related to cardiovascular autonomic control were greater than those of MICT in women with PCOS. METHODS: Women with PCOS were randomly allocated through a blind draw into three groups: control, MICT, and HIIT. The control group did not undergo exercise, whereas those in the MICT and HIIT groups underwent 16 weeks of aerobic physical training. All groups were evaluated before and after the 16 weeks of intervention in the following aspects: quantification of serum lipids, testosterone, fasting insulin and blood glucose; physical fitness through cardiopulmonary testing; analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) by linear (time domain and frequency domain) and non-linear (symbolic analysis) methods, analysis of blood pressure variability (BPV) and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). RESULTS: The final analysis, each group comprised 25 individuals. All groups had similar baseline parameters. After 16 weeks, intragroup comparison showed that the MICT and HIIT groups had a reduction in baseline heart rate (P < 0.001; P < 0.001, respectively) and testosterone levels P < 0.037; P < 0.012, respectively) associated with an increase in VO2(peak) (MICT, P < 0.001; HIIT, P < 0.001). The MICT (P < 0.36) and HIIT (P < 0.17) groups also showed an increase in cardiac vagal modulation, however only observed in the non-linear analysis. The intergroup comparison showed no differences between the MICT and HIIT groups in any of the hormonal, metabolic and autonomic parameters evaluated, including testosterone, peak oxygen uptake (VO2(peak)), HRV, BPV and BRS. CONCLUSION: HIIT and MICT showed similar results for the different parameters evaluated. This suggests that both training protocols can be recommended for the treatment of PCOS. Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (RBR-78qtwy).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9782449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97824492022-12-24 Cardiovascular autonomic modulation differences between moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval aerobic training in women with PCOS: A randomized trial Philbois, Stella V. Ribeiro, Victor B. Tank, Jens dos Reis, Rosana Maria Gerlach, Darius A. Souza, Hugo C. D. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: Moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) is strongly recommended for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) treatment. However, recent studies have suggested that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) would promote great benefits for cardiac autonomic control. Therefore, we investigated whether the benefits of HIIT related to cardiovascular autonomic control were greater than those of MICT in women with PCOS. METHODS: Women with PCOS were randomly allocated through a blind draw into three groups: control, MICT, and HIIT. The control group did not undergo exercise, whereas those in the MICT and HIIT groups underwent 16 weeks of aerobic physical training. All groups were evaluated before and after the 16 weeks of intervention in the following aspects: quantification of serum lipids, testosterone, fasting insulin and blood glucose; physical fitness through cardiopulmonary testing; analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) by linear (time domain and frequency domain) and non-linear (symbolic analysis) methods, analysis of blood pressure variability (BPV) and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). RESULTS: The final analysis, each group comprised 25 individuals. All groups had similar baseline parameters. After 16 weeks, intragroup comparison showed that the MICT and HIIT groups had a reduction in baseline heart rate (P < 0.001; P < 0.001, respectively) and testosterone levels P < 0.037; P < 0.012, respectively) associated with an increase in VO2(peak) (MICT, P < 0.001; HIIT, P < 0.001). The MICT (P < 0.36) and HIIT (P < 0.17) groups also showed an increase in cardiac vagal modulation, however only observed in the non-linear analysis. The intergroup comparison showed no differences between the MICT and HIIT groups in any of the hormonal, metabolic and autonomic parameters evaluated, including testosterone, peak oxygen uptake (VO2(peak)), HRV, BPV and BRS. CONCLUSION: HIIT and MICT showed similar results for the different parameters evaluated. This suggests that both training protocols can be recommended for the treatment of PCOS. Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (RBR-78qtwy). Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9782449/ /pubmed/36568110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1024844 Text en Copyright © 2022 Philbois, Ribeiro, Tank, Reis, Gerlach and Souza https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Philbois, Stella V.
Ribeiro, Victor B.
Tank, Jens
dos Reis, Rosana Maria
Gerlach, Darius A.
Souza, Hugo C. D.
Cardiovascular autonomic modulation differences between moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval aerobic training in women with PCOS: A randomized trial
title Cardiovascular autonomic modulation differences between moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval aerobic training in women with PCOS: A randomized trial
title_full Cardiovascular autonomic modulation differences between moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval aerobic training in women with PCOS: A randomized trial
title_fullStr Cardiovascular autonomic modulation differences between moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval aerobic training in women with PCOS: A randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular autonomic modulation differences between moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval aerobic training in women with PCOS: A randomized trial
title_short Cardiovascular autonomic modulation differences between moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval aerobic training in women with PCOS: A randomized trial
title_sort cardiovascular autonomic modulation differences between moderate-intensity continuous and high-intensity interval aerobic training in women with pcos: a randomized trial
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1024844
work_keys_str_mv AT philboisstellav cardiovascularautonomicmodulationdifferencesbetweenmoderateintensitycontinuousandhighintensityintervalaerobictraininginwomenwithpcosarandomizedtrial
AT ribeirovictorb cardiovascularautonomicmodulationdifferencesbetweenmoderateintensitycontinuousandhighintensityintervalaerobictraininginwomenwithpcosarandomizedtrial
AT tankjens cardiovascularautonomicmodulationdifferencesbetweenmoderateintensitycontinuousandhighintensityintervalaerobictraininginwomenwithpcosarandomizedtrial
AT dosreisrosanamaria cardiovascularautonomicmodulationdifferencesbetweenmoderateintensitycontinuousandhighintensityintervalaerobictraininginwomenwithpcosarandomizedtrial
AT gerlachdariusa cardiovascularautonomicmodulationdifferencesbetweenmoderateintensitycontinuousandhighintensityintervalaerobictraininginwomenwithpcosarandomizedtrial
AT souzahugocd cardiovascularautonomicmodulationdifferencesbetweenmoderateintensitycontinuousandhighintensityintervalaerobictraininginwomenwithpcosarandomizedtrial