Cargando…

Accuracy of the rotator cuff reparability score

BACKGROUND: The reparability of large or massive rotator cuff tears is difficult to determine pre-operatively. We previously identified age ≥ 65 years, acromiohumeral interval ≤ 6 mm, and anteroposterior tear size ≥ 22 mm as risk factors for rotator cuff repair failure. We therefore developed a rota...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prasathaporn, Niti, Kuptniratsaikul, Vanasiri, Thamrongskulsiri, Napatpong, Itthipanichpong, Thun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567865
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i12.1038
_version_ 1784857368764350464
author Prasathaporn, Niti
Kuptniratsaikul, Vanasiri
Thamrongskulsiri, Napatpong
Itthipanichpong, Thun
author_facet Prasathaporn, Niti
Kuptniratsaikul, Vanasiri
Thamrongskulsiri, Napatpong
Itthipanichpong, Thun
author_sort Prasathaporn, Niti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The reparability of large or massive rotator cuff tears is difficult to determine pre-operatively. We previously identified age ≥ 65 years, acromiohumeral interval ≤ 6 mm, and anteroposterior tear size ≥ 22 mm as risk factors for rotator cuff repair failure. We therefore developed a rotator cuff reparability score where each of the above risk factors is assigned a score of one point. AIM: To determine the accuracy of a rotator cuff reparability score. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of recruited patients with large or massive rotator cuff tears treated at our institution between January 2013 and December 2019. Exclusion criteria were revision surgery and patients with contraindications for surgery. All patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were categorized into either complete or partial rotator cuff repair. Rotator cuff reparability scores were calculated for each patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratio were assessed. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the optimal cut-off rotator cuff reparability score. RESULTS: Eighty patients (mean age, 61 years; range, 25–84 years; 41 females and 39 males) were recruited. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were good to excellent. The number of patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 risk factors for rotator cuff repair failure were 24, 33, 17, and 6, respectively. Complete repair was performed in all patients without risk factors. Two of the 33 patients with one risk factor and seven of the 17 patients with two risk factors underwent partial repair. One of the six patients with three risk factors underwent complete repair. The area under the curve was 0.894. The optimal cut-off score was two points with a sensitivity of 85.71% and a specificity of 83.33%. CONCLUSION: A rotator cuff reparability score of two was determined to be the optimal cut-off score for predicting the reparability of large or massive rotator cuff tears.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9782545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97825452022-12-24 Accuracy of the rotator cuff reparability score Prasathaporn, Niti Kuptniratsaikul, Vanasiri Thamrongskulsiri, Napatpong Itthipanichpong, Thun World J Orthop Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: The reparability of large or massive rotator cuff tears is difficult to determine pre-operatively. We previously identified age ≥ 65 years, acromiohumeral interval ≤ 6 mm, and anteroposterior tear size ≥ 22 mm as risk factors for rotator cuff repair failure. We therefore developed a rotator cuff reparability score where each of the above risk factors is assigned a score of one point. AIM: To determine the accuracy of a rotator cuff reparability score. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of recruited patients with large or massive rotator cuff tears treated at our institution between January 2013 and December 2019. Exclusion criteria were revision surgery and patients with contraindications for surgery. All patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were categorized into either complete or partial rotator cuff repair. Rotator cuff reparability scores were calculated for each patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratio were assessed. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the optimal cut-off rotator cuff reparability score. RESULTS: Eighty patients (mean age, 61 years; range, 25–84 years; 41 females and 39 males) were recruited. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were good to excellent. The number of patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 risk factors for rotator cuff repair failure were 24, 33, 17, and 6, respectively. Complete repair was performed in all patients without risk factors. Two of the 33 patients with one risk factor and seven of the 17 patients with two risk factors underwent partial repair. One of the six patients with three risk factors underwent complete repair. The area under the curve was 0.894. The optimal cut-off score was two points with a sensitivity of 85.71% and a specificity of 83.33%. CONCLUSION: A rotator cuff reparability score of two was determined to be the optimal cut-off score for predicting the reparability of large or massive rotator cuff tears. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9782545/ /pubmed/36567865 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i12.1038 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Prasathaporn, Niti
Kuptniratsaikul, Vanasiri
Thamrongskulsiri, Napatpong
Itthipanichpong, Thun
Accuracy of the rotator cuff reparability score
title Accuracy of the rotator cuff reparability score
title_full Accuracy of the rotator cuff reparability score
title_fullStr Accuracy of the rotator cuff reparability score
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of the rotator cuff reparability score
title_short Accuracy of the rotator cuff reparability score
title_sort accuracy of the rotator cuff reparability score
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9782545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36567865
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i12.1038
work_keys_str_mv AT prasathapornniti accuracyoftherotatorcuffreparabilityscore
AT kuptniratsaikulvanasiri accuracyoftherotatorcuffreparabilityscore
AT thamrongskulsirinapatpong accuracyoftherotatorcuffreparabilityscore
AT itthipanichpongthun accuracyoftherotatorcuffreparabilityscore