Cargando…

Perceptions towards biologic and biosimilar therapy of patients with rheumatic and gastroenterological conditions

BACKGROUND: Biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying agents (b/tsDMARDs) have broadened the treatment landscape for autoimmune diseases particularly in patients refractory to conventional DMARDs. More recently, the introduction of biosimilars has reduced the price of bDMARDs, potentially im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoo, Thomas, Sidhu, Navkiran, Marine, Franca, Lester, Susan, Quinlivan, Alannah, Rowett, Debra, Buchbinder, Rachelle, Hill, Catherine L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00309-4
_version_ 1784857568319897600
author Khoo, Thomas
Sidhu, Navkiran
Marine, Franca
Lester, Susan
Quinlivan, Alannah
Rowett, Debra
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Hill, Catherine L.
author_facet Khoo, Thomas
Sidhu, Navkiran
Marine, Franca
Lester, Susan
Quinlivan, Alannah
Rowett, Debra
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Hill, Catherine L.
author_sort Khoo, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying agents (b/tsDMARDs) have broadened the treatment landscape for autoimmune diseases particularly in patients refractory to conventional DMARDs. More recently, the introduction of biosimilars has reduced the price of bDMARDs, potentially improving accessibility. Though efficacy and safety have been described, patient attitudes to b/tsDMARDs are not well-understood. We aim to investigate patients’ beliefs about biologic and biosimilar therapy, and the factors influencing their perceptions. METHODS: Patient consumer groups (Arthritis Australia, Crohn’s and Colitis Australia) assisted in advertising an online questionnaire for people with a self-reported diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis (IA) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The questionnaire incorporated the Belief about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) and the single-item literacy screener (SILS). Sources and favourability of biologic/biosimilar information were analysed, using the chi-square and a non-parametric trend test for unordered and ordered categorical variables respectively, comparing respondents with IA and IBD. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty eight people (686–IA, 144–IBD, 8 both) responded. 658 (79%) used b/tsDMARDs. The BMQ demonstrated high necessity belief (median 4.2) with moderate concerns (median 2.8) about biologics. 95% of respondents obtained medication information from specialists though most used multiple sources (median 4). The most positive resources were specialists and specialist nurses. 73/141 (52%) respondents with IBD obtained information from specialist nurses compared with 202/685 (29%) with IA (p = 0.012). Respondents with limited reading ability on SILS were more likely to discuss information with a general practitioner or pharmacist. Younger respondents and those with higher BMQ concern scores more frequently consulted less reliable sources (e.g. social media). 502 respondents (60%) answered the biosimilar questions. Only 23 (4.6%) reported currently using a biosimilar and 336 (66.9%) were unsure if biosimilars were available in Australia. Specialist recommendation was the most frequent factor that would influence a patient to change from originator to biosimilar (352/495, 71.1%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high level of trust in specialists’ recommendations about b/tsDMARDs, although most people also utilise additional information sources. Contextual factors influencing resource selection include age, reading ability and degree of concern about medicines. People with IA and IBD have similar attitudes though those with IBD more frequently access specialist nurse advice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00309-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9783393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97833932022-12-24 Perceptions towards biologic and biosimilar therapy of patients with rheumatic and gastroenterological conditions Khoo, Thomas Sidhu, Navkiran Marine, Franca Lester, Susan Quinlivan, Alannah Rowett, Debra Buchbinder, Rachelle Hill, Catherine L. BMC Rheumatol Research BACKGROUND: Biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying agents (b/tsDMARDs) have broadened the treatment landscape for autoimmune diseases particularly in patients refractory to conventional DMARDs. More recently, the introduction of biosimilars has reduced the price of bDMARDs, potentially improving accessibility. Though efficacy and safety have been described, patient attitudes to b/tsDMARDs are not well-understood. We aim to investigate patients’ beliefs about biologic and biosimilar therapy, and the factors influencing their perceptions. METHODS: Patient consumer groups (Arthritis Australia, Crohn’s and Colitis Australia) assisted in advertising an online questionnaire for people with a self-reported diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis (IA) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The questionnaire incorporated the Belief about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) and the single-item literacy screener (SILS). Sources and favourability of biologic/biosimilar information were analysed, using the chi-square and a non-parametric trend test for unordered and ordered categorical variables respectively, comparing respondents with IA and IBD. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty eight people (686–IA, 144–IBD, 8 both) responded. 658 (79%) used b/tsDMARDs. The BMQ demonstrated high necessity belief (median 4.2) with moderate concerns (median 2.8) about biologics. 95% of respondents obtained medication information from specialists though most used multiple sources (median 4). The most positive resources were specialists and specialist nurses. 73/141 (52%) respondents with IBD obtained information from specialist nurses compared with 202/685 (29%) with IA (p = 0.012). Respondents with limited reading ability on SILS were more likely to discuss information with a general practitioner or pharmacist. Younger respondents and those with higher BMQ concern scores more frequently consulted less reliable sources (e.g. social media). 502 respondents (60%) answered the biosimilar questions. Only 23 (4.6%) reported currently using a biosimilar and 336 (66.9%) were unsure if biosimilars were available in Australia. Specialist recommendation was the most frequent factor that would influence a patient to change from originator to biosimilar (352/495, 71.1%). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high level of trust in specialists’ recommendations about b/tsDMARDs, although most people also utilise additional information sources. Contextual factors influencing resource selection include age, reading ability and degree of concern about medicines. People with IA and IBD have similar attitudes though those with IBD more frequently access specialist nurse advice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00309-4. BioMed Central 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9783393/ /pubmed/36550585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00309-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Khoo, Thomas
Sidhu, Navkiran
Marine, Franca
Lester, Susan
Quinlivan, Alannah
Rowett, Debra
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Hill, Catherine L.
Perceptions towards biologic and biosimilar therapy of patients with rheumatic and gastroenterological conditions
title Perceptions towards biologic and biosimilar therapy of patients with rheumatic and gastroenterological conditions
title_full Perceptions towards biologic and biosimilar therapy of patients with rheumatic and gastroenterological conditions
title_fullStr Perceptions towards biologic and biosimilar therapy of patients with rheumatic and gastroenterological conditions
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions towards biologic and biosimilar therapy of patients with rheumatic and gastroenterological conditions
title_short Perceptions towards biologic and biosimilar therapy of patients with rheumatic and gastroenterological conditions
title_sort perceptions towards biologic and biosimilar therapy of patients with rheumatic and gastroenterological conditions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00309-4
work_keys_str_mv AT khoothomas perceptionstowardsbiologicandbiosimilartherapyofpatientswithrheumaticandgastroenterologicalconditions
AT sidhunavkiran perceptionstowardsbiologicandbiosimilartherapyofpatientswithrheumaticandgastroenterologicalconditions
AT marinefranca perceptionstowardsbiologicandbiosimilartherapyofpatientswithrheumaticandgastroenterologicalconditions
AT lestersusan perceptionstowardsbiologicandbiosimilartherapyofpatientswithrheumaticandgastroenterologicalconditions
AT quinlivanalannah perceptionstowardsbiologicandbiosimilartherapyofpatientswithrheumaticandgastroenterologicalconditions
AT rowettdebra perceptionstowardsbiologicandbiosimilartherapyofpatientswithrheumaticandgastroenterologicalconditions
AT buchbinderrachelle perceptionstowardsbiologicandbiosimilartherapyofpatientswithrheumaticandgastroenterologicalconditions
AT hillcatherinel perceptionstowardsbiologicandbiosimilartherapyofpatientswithrheumaticandgastroenterologicalconditions