Cargando…
The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption
BACKGROUND: Despite the great potential of FUS-BBB disruption (FUS-BBBD), it is still controversial whether FUS-BBBD acts as an inducing factor of neuro-inflammation or not, and the biological responses after FUS-BBBD triggers the inflammatory process are poorly understood. The aim of this study is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00402-3 |
_version_ | 1784857570532392960 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Hyo Jin Han, Mun Seo, Hyeon Park, Chan Yuk Lee, Eun-Hee Park, Juyoung |
author_facet | Choi, Hyo Jin Han, Mun Seo, Hyeon Park, Chan Yuk Lee, Eun-Hee Park, Juyoung |
author_sort | Choi, Hyo Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the great potential of FUS-BBB disruption (FUS-BBBD), it is still controversial whether FUS-BBBD acts as an inducing factor of neuro-inflammation or not, and the biological responses after FUS-BBBD triggers the inflammatory process are poorly understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety window for FUS levels based on a comprehensive safety assessment. METHODS: The mice were treated with two different ultrasound parameters (0.25 MPa and 0.42 MPa) in the thalamus region of brain. The efficacy of BBB opening was verified by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and the cavitation monitoring. The transcriptome analysis was performed to investigate the molecular response for the two BBBD conditions after FUS-mediated BBB opening in time-dependent manners. Histological analysis was used for evaluation of the tissue damage, neuronal degeneration, and activation of glial cells induced by FUS-BBBD. RESULTS: The BBBD, as quantified by the K(trans), was approximately threefold higher in 0.42 MPa-treated group than 0.25 MPa-treated group. While the minimal tissue/cellular damage was found in 0.25 MPa-treated group, visible damages containing microhemorrhages and degenerating neurons were detected in 0.42 MPa-treated group in accordance with the extent of BBBD. In transcriptome analysis, 0.42 MPa-treated group exhibited highly dynamic changes in the expression levels of an inflammatory response or NF-κB pathway-relative genes in a time-dependent manner whereas, 0.25 MPa was not altered. Interestingly, although it is clear that 0.42 MPa induces neuroinflammation through glial activation, neuroprotective properties were evident by the expression of A2-type astrocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings propose that a well-defined BBBD parameter of 0.25 MPa could ensure the safety without cellular/tissue damage or sterile inflammatory response in the brain. Furthermore, the fact that the excessive sonication parameters at 0.42 MPa could induce a sterile inflammation response via glial activation suggested the possibility that could lead to tissue repair toward the homeostasis of the brain microenvironment through A2-type reactive astrocytes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12987-022-00402-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9783406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97834062022-12-24 The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption Choi, Hyo Jin Han, Mun Seo, Hyeon Park, Chan Yuk Lee, Eun-Hee Park, Juyoung Fluids Barriers CNS Research BACKGROUND: Despite the great potential of FUS-BBB disruption (FUS-BBBD), it is still controversial whether FUS-BBBD acts as an inducing factor of neuro-inflammation or not, and the biological responses after FUS-BBBD triggers the inflammatory process are poorly understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety window for FUS levels based on a comprehensive safety assessment. METHODS: The mice were treated with two different ultrasound parameters (0.25 MPa and 0.42 MPa) in the thalamus region of brain. The efficacy of BBB opening was verified by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and the cavitation monitoring. The transcriptome analysis was performed to investigate the molecular response for the two BBBD conditions after FUS-mediated BBB opening in time-dependent manners. Histological analysis was used for evaluation of the tissue damage, neuronal degeneration, and activation of glial cells induced by FUS-BBBD. RESULTS: The BBBD, as quantified by the K(trans), was approximately threefold higher in 0.42 MPa-treated group than 0.25 MPa-treated group. While the minimal tissue/cellular damage was found in 0.25 MPa-treated group, visible damages containing microhemorrhages and degenerating neurons were detected in 0.42 MPa-treated group in accordance with the extent of BBBD. In transcriptome analysis, 0.42 MPa-treated group exhibited highly dynamic changes in the expression levels of an inflammatory response or NF-κB pathway-relative genes in a time-dependent manner whereas, 0.25 MPa was not altered. Interestingly, although it is clear that 0.42 MPa induces neuroinflammation through glial activation, neuroprotective properties were evident by the expression of A2-type astrocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings propose that a well-defined BBBD parameter of 0.25 MPa could ensure the safety without cellular/tissue damage or sterile inflammatory response in the brain. Furthermore, the fact that the excessive sonication parameters at 0.42 MPa could induce a sterile inflammation response via glial activation suggested the possibility that could lead to tissue repair toward the homeostasis of the brain microenvironment through A2-type reactive astrocytes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12987-022-00402-3. BioMed Central 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9783406/ /pubmed/36564820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00402-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Choi, Hyo Jin Han, Mun Seo, Hyeon Park, Chan Yuk Lee, Eun-Hee Park, Juyoung The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption |
title | The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption |
title_full | The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption |
title_fullStr | The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption |
title_full_unstemmed | The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption |
title_short | The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption |
title_sort | new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00402-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choihyojin thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT hanmun thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT seohyeon thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT parkchanyuk thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT leeeunhee thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT parkjuyoung thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT choihyojin newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT hanmun newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT seohyeon newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT parkchanyuk newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT leeeunhee newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption AT parkjuyoung newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption |