Cargando…

The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption

BACKGROUND: Despite the great potential of FUS-BBB disruption (FUS-BBBD), it is still controversial whether FUS-BBBD acts as an inducing factor of neuro-inflammation or not, and the biological responses after FUS-BBBD triggers the inflammatory process are poorly understood. The aim of this study is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Hyo Jin, Han, Mun, Seo, Hyeon, Park, Chan Yuk, Lee, Eun-Hee, Park, Juyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00402-3
_version_ 1784857570532392960
author Choi, Hyo Jin
Han, Mun
Seo, Hyeon
Park, Chan Yuk
Lee, Eun-Hee
Park, Juyoung
author_facet Choi, Hyo Jin
Han, Mun
Seo, Hyeon
Park, Chan Yuk
Lee, Eun-Hee
Park, Juyoung
author_sort Choi, Hyo Jin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the great potential of FUS-BBB disruption (FUS-BBBD), it is still controversial whether FUS-BBBD acts as an inducing factor of neuro-inflammation or not, and the biological responses after FUS-BBBD triggers the inflammatory process are poorly understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety window for FUS levels based on a comprehensive safety assessment. METHODS: The mice were treated with two different ultrasound parameters (0.25 MPa and 0.42 MPa) in the thalamus region of brain. The efficacy of BBB opening was verified by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and the cavitation monitoring. The transcriptome analysis was performed to investigate the molecular response for the two BBBD conditions after FUS-mediated BBB opening in time-dependent manners. Histological analysis was used for evaluation of the tissue damage, neuronal degeneration, and activation of glial cells induced by FUS-BBBD. RESULTS: The BBBD, as quantified by the K(trans), was approximately threefold higher in 0.42 MPa-treated group than 0.25 MPa-treated group. While the minimal tissue/cellular damage was found in 0.25 MPa-treated group, visible damages containing microhemorrhages and degenerating neurons were detected in 0.42 MPa-treated group in accordance with the extent of BBBD. In transcriptome analysis, 0.42 MPa-treated group exhibited highly dynamic changes in the expression levels of an inflammatory response or NF-κB pathway-relative genes in a time-dependent manner whereas, 0.25 MPa was not altered. Interestingly, although it is clear that 0.42 MPa induces neuroinflammation through glial activation, neuroprotective properties were evident by the expression of A2-type astrocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings propose that a well-defined BBBD parameter of 0.25 MPa could ensure the safety without cellular/tissue damage or sterile inflammatory response in the brain. Furthermore, the fact that the excessive sonication parameters at 0.42 MPa could induce a sterile inflammation response via glial activation suggested the possibility that could lead to tissue repair toward the homeostasis of the brain microenvironment through A2-type reactive astrocytes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12987-022-00402-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9783406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97834062022-12-24 The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption Choi, Hyo Jin Han, Mun Seo, Hyeon Park, Chan Yuk Lee, Eun-Hee Park, Juyoung Fluids Barriers CNS Research BACKGROUND: Despite the great potential of FUS-BBB disruption (FUS-BBBD), it is still controversial whether FUS-BBBD acts as an inducing factor of neuro-inflammation or not, and the biological responses after FUS-BBBD triggers the inflammatory process are poorly understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety window for FUS levels based on a comprehensive safety assessment. METHODS: The mice were treated with two different ultrasound parameters (0.25 MPa and 0.42 MPa) in the thalamus region of brain. The efficacy of BBB opening was verified by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and the cavitation monitoring. The transcriptome analysis was performed to investigate the molecular response for the two BBBD conditions after FUS-mediated BBB opening in time-dependent manners. Histological analysis was used for evaluation of the tissue damage, neuronal degeneration, and activation of glial cells induced by FUS-BBBD. RESULTS: The BBBD, as quantified by the K(trans), was approximately threefold higher in 0.42 MPa-treated group than 0.25 MPa-treated group. While the minimal tissue/cellular damage was found in 0.25 MPa-treated group, visible damages containing microhemorrhages and degenerating neurons were detected in 0.42 MPa-treated group in accordance with the extent of BBBD. In transcriptome analysis, 0.42 MPa-treated group exhibited highly dynamic changes in the expression levels of an inflammatory response or NF-κB pathway-relative genes in a time-dependent manner whereas, 0.25 MPa was not altered. Interestingly, although it is clear that 0.42 MPa induces neuroinflammation through glial activation, neuroprotective properties were evident by the expression of A2-type astrocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings propose that a well-defined BBBD parameter of 0.25 MPa could ensure the safety without cellular/tissue damage or sterile inflammatory response in the brain. Furthermore, the fact that the excessive sonication parameters at 0.42 MPa could induce a sterile inflammation response via glial activation suggested the possibility that could lead to tissue repair toward the homeostasis of the brain microenvironment through A2-type reactive astrocytes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12987-022-00402-3. BioMed Central 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9783406/ /pubmed/36564820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00402-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Choi, Hyo Jin
Han, Mun
Seo, Hyeon
Park, Chan Yuk
Lee, Eun-Hee
Park, Juyoung
The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption
title The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption
title_full The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption
title_fullStr The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption
title_full_unstemmed The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption
title_short The new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption
title_sort new insight into the inflammatory response following focused ultrasound-mediated blood–brain barrier disruption
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00402-3
work_keys_str_mv AT choihyojin thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT hanmun thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT seohyeon thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT parkchanyuk thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT leeeunhee thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT parkjuyoung thenewinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT choihyojin newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT hanmun newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT seohyeon newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT parkchanyuk newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT leeeunhee newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption
AT parkjuyoung newinsightintotheinflammatoryresponsefollowingfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruption