Cargando…

Wearable Intelligent Machine Learning Rehabilitation Assessment for Stroke Patients Compared with Clinician Assessment

In order to solve the shortcomings of the current clinical scale assessment for stroke patients, such as excessive time consumption, strong subjectivity, and coarse grading, this study designed an intelligent rehabilitation assessment system based on wearable devices and a machine learning algorithm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Liquan, Zhang, Bochao, Wang, Jiping, Wu, Qunqiang, Li, Xinming, Zhou, Linfu, Xiong, Daxi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247467
_version_ 1784857573726355456
author Guo, Liquan
Zhang, Bochao
Wang, Jiping
Wu, Qunqiang
Li, Xinming
Zhou, Linfu
Xiong, Daxi
author_facet Guo, Liquan
Zhang, Bochao
Wang, Jiping
Wu, Qunqiang
Li, Xinming
Zhou, Linfu
Xiong, Daxi
author_sort Guo, Liquan
collection PubMed
description In order to solve the shortcomings of the current clinical scale assessment for stroke patients, such as excessive time consumption, strong subjectivity, and coarse grading, this study designed an intelligent rehabilitation assessment system based on wearable devices and a machine learning algorithm and explored the effectiveness of the system in assessing patients’ rehabilitation outcomes. The accuracy and effectiveness of the intelligent rehabilitation assessment system were verified by comparing the consistency and time between the designed intelligent rehabilitation assessment system scores and the clinical Fugl–Meyer assessment (FMA) scores. A total of 120 stroke patients from two hospitals participated as volunteers in the trial study, and statistical analyses of the two assessment methods were performed. The results showed that the R(2) of the total score regression analysis for both methods was 0.9667, 95% CI 0.92–0.98, p < 0.001, and the mean of the deviation was 0.30, 95% CI 0.57–1.17. The percentages of deviations/relative deviations falling within the mean ± 1.96 SD of deviations/relative deviations were 92.50% and 95.83%, respectively. The mean time for system assessment was 35.00% less than that for clinician assessment, p < 0.05. Therefore, wearable intelligent machine learning rehabilitation assessment has a strong and significant correlation with clinician assessment, and the time spent is significantly reduced, which provides an accurate, objective, and effective solution for clinical rehabilitation assessment and remote rehabilitation without the presence of physicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9783419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97834192022-12-24 Wearable Intelligent Machine Learning Rehabilitation Assessment for Stroke Patients Compared with Clinician Assessment Guo, Liquan Zhang, Bochao Wang, Jiping Wu, Qunqiang Li, Xinming Zhou, Linfu Xiong, Daxi J Clin Med Article In order to solve the shortcomings of the current clinical scale assessment for stroke patients, such as excessive time consumption, strong subjectivity, and coarse grading, this study designed an intelligent rehabilitation assessment system based on wearable devices and a machine learning algorithm and explored the effectiveness of the system in assessing patients’ rehabilitation outcomes. The accuracy and effectiveness of the intelligent rehabilitation assessment system were verified by comparing the consistency and time between the designed intelligent rehabilitation assessment system scores and the clinical Fugl–Meyer assessment (FMA) scores. A total of 120 stroke patients from two hospitals participated as volunteers in the trial study, and statistical analyses of the two assessment methods were performed. The results showed that the R(2) of the total score regression analysis for both methods was 0.9667, 95% CI 0.92–0.98, p < 0.001, and the mean of the deviation was 0.30, 95% CI 0.57–1.17. The percentages of deviations/relative deviations falling within the mean ± 1.96 SD of deviations/relative deviations were 92.50% and 95.83%, respectively. The mean time for system assessment was 35.00% less than that for clinician assessment, p < 0.05. Therefore, wearable intelligent machine learning rehabilitation assessment has a strong and significant correlation with clinician assessment, and the time spent is significantly reduced, which provides an accurate, objective, and effective solution for clinical rehabilitation assessment and remote rehabilitation without the presence of physicians. MDPI 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9783419/ /pubmed/36556083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247467 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guo, Liquan
Zhang, Bochao
Wang, Jiping
Wu, Qunqiang
Li, Xinming
Zhou, Linfu
Xiong, Daxi
Wearable Intelligent Machine Learning Rehabilitation Assessment for Stroke Patients Compared with Clinician Assessment
title Wearable Intelligent Machine Learning Rehabilitation Assessment for Stroke Patients Compared with Clinician Assessment
title_full Wearable Intelligent Machine Learning Rehabilitation Assessment for Stroke Patients Compared with Clinician Assessment
title_fullStr Wearable Intelligent Machine Learning Rehabilitation Assessment for Stroke Patients Compared with Clinician Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Wearable Intelligent Machine Learning Rehabilitation Assessment for Stroke Patients Compared with Clinician Assessment
title_short Wearable Intelligent Machine Learning Rehabilitation Assessment for Stroke Patients Compared with Clinician Assessment
title_sort wearable intelligent machine learning rehabilitation assessment for stroke patients compared with clinician assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247467
work_keys_str_mv AT guoliquan wearableintelligentmachinelearningrehabilitationassessmentforstrokepatientscomparedwithclinicianassessment
AT zhangbochao wearableintelligentmachinelearningrehabilitationassessmentforstrokepatientscomparedwithclinicianassessment
AT wangjiping wearableintelligentmachinelearningrehabilitationassessmentforstrokepatientscomparedwithclinicianassessment
AT wuqunqiang wearableintelligentmachinelearningrehabilitationassessmentforstrokepatientscomparedwithclinicianassessment
AT lixinming wearableintelligentmachinelearningrehabilitationassessmentforstrokepatientscomparedwithclinicianassessment
AT zhoulinfu wearableintelligentmachinelearningrehabilitationassessmentforstrokepatientscomparedwithclinicianassessment
AT xiongdaxi wearableintelligentmachinelearningrehabilitationassessmentforstrokepatientscomparedwithclinicianassessment