Cargando…
The evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders
Cooperatively breeding animals live longer than their solitary counterparts. This has been suggested for birds, mole rats, and social insects. A common explanation for these long lifespans is that cooperative breeding evolves more readily in long‐lived species because lower mortality reduces the rat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.307 |
_version_ | 1784857582517616640 |
---|---|
author | Kreider, Jan J. Kramer, Boris H. Komdeur, Jan Pen, Ido |
author_facet | Kreider, Jan J. Kramer, Boris H. Komdeur, Jan Pen, Ido |
author_sort | Kreider, Jan J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cooperatively breeding animals live longer than their solitary counterparts. This has been suggested for birds, mole rats, and social insects. A common explanation for these long lifespans is that cooperative breeding evolves more readily in long‐lived species because lower mortality reduces the rate of territory turnover and thus leads to a limitation of breeding territories. Here, we reverse this argument and show that—rather than being a cause for its evolution—long lifespans are an evolutionary consequence of cooperative breeding. In evolutionary individual‐based simulations, we show that natural selection favors a delayed onset of senescence in cooperative breeders, relative to solitary breeders, because cooperative breeders have a delayed age of first reproduction as helpers wait in a reproductive queue to obtain breeder status. Especially long lifespans evolve in cooperative breeders in which queue positions depend on the helpers’ age rank among the helpers within the breeding territory. Furthermore, we show that lower genetic relatedness among group members leads to the evolution of longer lifespans. This is because selection against higher mortality is weaker when mortality reduces competition for breeding between relatives. Our results link the evolutionary theory of ageing with kin selection theory, demonstrating that the evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders is driven by the timing of reproduction and kin structure within breeding territories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9783459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97834592022-12-27 The evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders Kreider, Jan J. Kramer, Boris H. Komdeur, Jan Pen, Ido Evol Lett Letters Cooperatively breeding animals live longer than their solitary counterparts. This has been suggested for birds, mole rats, and social insects. A common explanation for these long lifespans is that cooperative breeding evolves more readily in long‐lived species because lower mortality reduces the rate of territory turnover and thus leads to a limitation of breeding territories. Here, we reverse this argument and show that—rather than being a cause for its evolution—long lifespans are an evolutionary consequence of cooperative breeding. In evolutionary individual‐based simulations, we show that natural selection favors a delayed onset of senescence in cooperative breeders, relative to solitary breeders, because cooperative breeders have a delayed age of first reproduction as helpers wait in a reproductive queue to obtain breeder status. Especially long lifespans evolve in cooperative breeders in which queue positions depend on the helpers’ age rank among the helpers within the breeding territory. Furthermore, we show that lower genetic relatedness among group members leads to the evolution of longer lifespans. This is because selection against higher mortality is weaker when mortality reduces competition for breeding between relatives. Our results link the evolutionary theory of ageing with kin selection theory, demonstrating that the evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders is driven by the timing of reproduction and kin structure within breeding territories. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9783459/ /pubmed/36579168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.307 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Letters Kreider, Jan J. Kramer, Boris H. Komdeur, Jan Pen, Ido The evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders |
title | The evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders |
title_full | The evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders |
title_fullStr | The evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders |
title_full_unstemmed | The evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders |
title_short | The evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders |
title_sort | evolution of ageing in cooperative breeders |
topic | Letters |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.307 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kreiderjanj theevolutionofageingincooperativebreeders AT kramerborish theevolutionofageingincooperativebreeders AT komdeurjan theevolutionofageingincooperativebreeders AT penido theevolutionofageingincooperativebreeders AT kreiderjanj evolutionofageingincooperativebreeders AT kramerborish evolutionofageingincooperativebreeders AT komdeurjan evolutionofageingincooperativebreeders AT penido evolutionofageingincooperativebreeders |