Cargando…

Divergence and introgression among the virilis group of Drosophila

Speciation with gene flow is now widely regarded as common. However, the frequency of introgression between recently diverged species and the evolutionary consequences of gene flow are still poorly understood. The virilis group of Drosophila contains 12 species that are geographically widespread and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yusuf, Leeban H., Tyukmaeva, Venera, Hoikkala, Anneli, Ritchie, Michael G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.301
_version_ 1784857588651786240
author Yusuf, Leeban H.
Tyukmaeva, Venera
Hoikkala, Anneli
Ritchie, Michael G.
author_facet Yusuf, Leeban H.
Tyukmaeva, Venera
Hoikkala, Anneli
Ritchie, Michael G.
author_sort Yusuf, Leeban H.
collection PubMed
description Speciation with gene flow is now widely regarded as common. However, the frequency of introgression between recently diverged species and the evolutionary consequences of gene flow are still poorly understood. The virilis group of Drosophila contains 12 species that are geographically widespread and show varying levels of prezygotic and postzygotic isolation. Here, we use de novo genome assemblies and whole‐genome sequencing data to resolve phylogenetic relationships and describe patterns of introgression and divergence across the group. We suggest that the virilis group consists of three, rather than the traditional two, subgroups. Some genes undergoing rapid sequence divergence across the group were involved in chemical communication and desiccation tolerance, and may be related to the evolution of sexual isolation and adaptation. We found evidence of pervasive phylogenetic discordance caused by ancient introgression events between distant lineages within the group, and more recent gene flow between closely related species. When assessing patterns of genome‐wide divergence in species pairs across the group, we found no consistent genomic evidence of a disproportionate role for the X chromosome as has been found in other systems. Our results show how ancient and recent introgressions confuse phylogenetic reconstruction, but may play an important role during early radiation of a group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9783487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97834872022-12-27 Divergence and introgression among the virilis group of Drosophila Yusuf, Leeban H. Tyukmaeva, Venera Hoikkala, Anneli Ritchie, Michael G. Evol Lett Letters Speciation with gene flow is now widely regarded as common. However, the frequency of introgression between recently diverged species and the evolutionary consequences of gene flow are still poorly understood. The virilis group of Drosophila contains 12 species that are geographically widespread and show varying levels of prezygotic and postzygotic isolation. Here, we use de novo genome assemblies and whole‐genome sequencing data to resolve phylogenetic relationships and describe patterns of introgression and divergence across the group. We suggest that the virilis group consists of three, rather than the traditional two, subgroups. Some genes undergoing rapid sequence divergence across the group were involved in chemical communication and desiccation tolerance, and may be related to the evolution of sexual isolation and adaptation. We found evidence of pervasive phylogenetic discordance caused by ancient introgression events between distant lineages within the group, and more recent gene flow between closely related species. When assessing patterns of genome‐wide divergence in species pairs across the group, we found no consistent genomic evidence of a disproportionate role for the X chromosome as has been found in other systems. Our results show how ancient and recent introgressions confuse phylogenetic reconstruction, but may play an important role during early radiation of a group. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9783487/ /pubmed/36579165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.301 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
Yusuf, Leeban H.
Tyukmaeva, Venera
Hoikkala, Anneli
Ritchie, Michael G.
Divergence and introgression among the virilis group of Drosophila
title Divergence and introgression among the virilis group of Drosophila
title_full Divergence and introgression among the virilis group of Drosophila
title_fullStr Divergence and introgression among the virilis group of Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Divergence and introgression among the virilis group of Drosophila
title_short Divergence and introgression among the virilis group of Drosophila
title_sort divergence and introgression among the virilis group of drosophila
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36579165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.301
work_keys_str_mv AT yusufleebanh divergenceandintrogressionamongthevirilisgroupofdrosophila
AT tyukmaevavenera divergenceandintrogressionamongthevirilisgroupofdrosophila
AT hoikkalaanneli divergenceandintrogressionamongthevirilisgroupofdrosophila
AT ritchiemichaelg divergenceandintrogressionamongthevirilisgroupofdrosophila