Cargando…

Validation of Pharmacogenomic Interaction Probability (PIP) Scores in Predicting Drug–Gene, Drug–Drug–Gene, and Drug–Gene–Gene Interaction Risks in a Large Patient Population

Utilizing pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing and integrating evidence-based guidance in drug therapy enables an improved treatment response and decreases the occurrence of adverse drug events. We conducted a retrospective analysis to validate the YouScript(®) PGx interaction probability (PIP) algorithm,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashcraft, Kristine, Grande, Kendra, Bristow, Sara L., Moyer, Nicolas, Schmidlen, Tara, Moretz, Chad, Wick, Jennifer A., Blaxall, Burns C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12121972
_version_ 1784857641487433728
author Ashcraft, Kristine
Grande, Kendra
Bristow, Sara L.
Moyer, Nicolas
Schmidlen, Tara
Moretz, Chad
Wick, Jennifer A.
Blaxall, Burns C.
author_facet Ashcraft, Kristine
Grande, Kendra
Bristow, Sara L.
Moyer, Nicolas
Schmidlen, Tara
Moretz, Chad
Wick, Jennifer A.
Blaxall, Burns C.
author_sort Ashcraft, Kristine
collection PubMed
description Utilizing pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing and integrating evidence-based guidance in drug therapy enables an improved treatment response and decreases the occurrence of adverse drug events. We conducted a retrospective analysis to validate the YouScript(®) PGx interaction probability (PIP) algorithm, which predicts patients for whom PGx testing would identify one or more evidence-based, actionable drug–gene, drug–drug–gene, or drug–gene–gene interactions (EADGIs). PIP scores generated for 36,511 patients were assessed according to the results of PGx multigene panel testing. PIP scores versus the proportion of patients in whom at least one EADGI was found were 22.4% vs. 22.4% (p = 1.000), 23.5% vs. 23.4% (p = 0.6895), 30.9% vs. 29.4% (p = 0.0667), and 27.3% vs. 26.4% (p = 0.3583) for patients tested with a minimum of 3-, 5-, 14-, and 25-gene panels, respectively. These data suggest a striking concordance between the PIP scores and the EAGDIs found by gene panel testing. The ability to identify patients most likely to benefit from PGx testing has the potential to reduce health care costs, enable patient access to personalized medicine, and ultimately improve drug efficacy and safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9783707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97837072022-12-24 Validation of Pharmacogenomic Interaction Probability (PIP) Scores in Predicting Drug–Gene, Drug–Drug–Gene, and Drug–Gene–Gene Interaction Risks in a Large Patient Population Ashcraft, Kristine Grande, Kendra Bristow, Sara L. Moyer, Nicolas Schmidlen, Tara Moretz, Chad Wick, Jennifer A. Blaxall, Burns C. J Pers Med Article Utilizing pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing and integrating evidence-based guidance in drug therapy enables an improved treatment response and decreases the occurrence of adverse drug events. We conducted a retrospective analysis to validate the YouScript(®) PGx interaction probability (PIP) algorithm, which predicts patients for whom PGx testing would identify one or more evidence-based, actionable drug–gene, drug–drug–gene, or drug–gene–gene interactions (EADGIs). PIP scores generated for 36,511 patients were assessed according to the results of PGx multigene panel testing. PIP scores versus the proportion of patients in whom at least one EADGI was found were 22.4% vs. 22.4% (p = 1.000), 23.5% vs. 23.4% (p = 0.6895), 30.9% vs. 29.4% (p = 0.0667), and 27.3% vs. 26.4% (p = 0.3583) for patients tested with a minimum of 3-, 5-, 14-, and 25-gene panels, respectively. These data suggest a striking concordance between the PIP scores and the EAGDIs found by gene panel testing. The ability to identify patients most likely to benefit from PGx testing has the potential to reduce health care costs, enable patient access to personalized medicine, and ultimately improve drug efficacy and safety. MDPI 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9783707/ /pubmed/36556194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12121972 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ashcraft, Kristine
Grande, Kendra
Bristow, Sara L.
Moyer, Nicolas
Schmidlen, Tara
Moretz, Chad
Wick, Jennifer A.
Blaxall, Burns C.
Validation of Pharmacogenomic Interaction Probability (PIP) Scores in Predicting Drug–Gene, Drug–Drug–Gene, and Drug–Gene–Gene Interaction Risks in a Large Patient Population
title Validation of Pharmacogenomic Interaction Probability (PIP) Scores in Predicting Drug–Gene, Drug–Drug–Gene, and Drug–Gene–Gene Interaction Risks in a Large Patient Population
title_full Validation of Pharmacogenomic Interaction Probability (PIP) Scores in Predicting Drug–Gene, Drug–Drug–Gene, and Drug–Gene–Gene Interaction Risks in a Large Patient Population
title_fullStr Validation of Pharmacogenomic Interaction Probability (PIP) Scores in Predicting Drug–Gene, Drug–Drug–Gene, and Drug–Gene–Gene Interaction Risks in a Large Patient Population
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Pharmacogenomic Interaction Probability (PIP) Scores in Predicting Drug–Gene, Drug–Drug–Gene, and Drug–Gene–Gene Interaction Risks in a Large Patient Population
title_short Validation of Pharmacogenomic Interaction Probability (PIP) Scores in Predicting Drug–Gene, Drug–Drug–Gene, and Drug–Gene–Gene Interaction Risks in a Large Patient Population
title_sort validation of pharmacogenomic interaction probability (pip) scores in predicting drug–gene, drug–drug–gene, and drug–gene–gene interaction risks in a large patient population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12121972
work_keys_str_mv AT ashcraftkristine validationofpharmacogenomicinteractionprobabilitypipscoresinpredictingdruggenedrugdruggeneanddruggenegeneinteractionrisksinalargepatientpopulation
AT grandekendra validationofpharmacogenomicinteractionprobabilitypipscoresinpredictingdruggenedrugdruggeneanddruggenegeneinteractionrisksinalargepatientpopulation
AT bristowsaral validationofpharmacogenomicinteractionprobabilitypipscoresinpredictingdruggenedrugdruggeneanddruggenegeneinteractionrisksinalargepatientpopulation
AT moyernicolas validationofpharmacogenomicinteractionprobabilitypipscoresinpredictingdruggenedrugdruggeneanddruggenegeneinteractionrisksinalargepatientpopulation
AT schmidlentara validationofpharmacogenomicinteractionprobabilitypipscoresinpredictingdruggenedrugdruggeneanddruggenegeneinteractionrisksinalargepatientpopulation
AT moretzchad validationofpharmacogenomicinteractionprobabilitypipscoresinpredictingdruggenedrugdruggeneanddruggenegeneinteractionrisksinalargepatientpopulation
AT wickjennifera validationofpharmacogenomicinteractionprobabilitypipscoresinpredictingdruggenedrugdruggeneanddruggenegeneinteractionrisksinalargepatientpopulation
AT blaxallburnsc validationofpharmacogenomicinteractionprobabilitypipscoresinpredictingdruggenedrugdruggeneanddruggenegeneinteractionrisksinalargepatientpopulation