Cargando…

Real-World Evaluation of the Tolerability to Onabotulinum Toxin A: The RETO Study

Onabotulinumtoxin A (onabotA) has shown efficacy in chronic migraine (CM), with good tolerability and a low rate of adverse effects, most of them not severe. The aim of this study is to evaluate tolerability and adverse effects of onabotA in clinical practice and to analyze if there is a relationshi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Azorín, David, Martínez, Blanca, Gutiérrez, María, Ruiz-Piñero, Marina, Echavarría, Ana, Sierra, Álvaro, Guerrero, Ángel L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548746
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins14120850
_version_ 1784857684455981056
author García-Azorín, David
Martínez, Blanca
Gutiérrez, María
Ruiz-Piñero, Marina
Echavarría, Ana
Sierra, Álvaro
Guerrero, Ángel L.
author_facet García-Azorín, David
Martínez, Blanca
Gutiérrez, María
Ruiz-Piñero, Marina
Echavarría, Ana
Sierra, Álvaro
Guerrero, Ángel L.
author_sort García-Azorín, David
collection PubMed
description Onabotulinumtoxin A (onabotA) has shown efficacy in chronic migraine (CM), with good tolerability and a low rate of adverse effects, most of them not severe. The aim of this study is to evaluate tolerability and adverse effects of onabotA in clinical practice and to analyze if there is a relationship between tolerability to treatment administration, adverse effects’ (AEs) occurrence and clinical response. We included patients with CM that received treatment with onabotA for the first time. Tolerability to treatment was evaluated by a 0–10 numeric rating scale (0: worst possible, 10: optimal tolerability). We assessed the presence of AEs by using a standardized questionnaire. Treatment response was based on the 50 and 75% responder rate between weeks 20 and 24, compared with the baseline, according to headache diaries. We analyzed whether the tolerability was associated with a higher frequency of AEs or a higher probability of clinical response. We included 105 patients, 87.7% female, with an age of 43.9 ± 10.7 years. Mean tolerability was 7.8/10 and 7.2/10 in the first and second onabotA administration, respectively. AEs were reported by (first-second) 71.4–68.6% patients. The percentage of patients with a 50% response was 56.3%. There was no association between tolerability and AEs’ occurrence or clinical response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9783903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97839032022-12-24 Real-World Evaluation of the Tolerability to Onabotulinum Toxin A: The RETO Study García-Azorín, David Martínez, Blanca Gutiérrez, María Ruiz-Piñero, Marina Echavarría, Ana Sierra, Álvaro Guerrero, Ángel L. Toxins (Basel) Article Onabotulinumtoxin A (onabotA) has shown efficacy in chronic migraine (CM), with good tolerability and a low rate of adverse effects, most of them not severe. The aim of this study is to evaluate tolerability and adverse effects of onabotA in clinical practice and to analyze if there is a relationship between tolerability to treatment administration, adverse effects’ (AEs) occurrence and clinical response. We included patients with CM that received treatment with onabotA for the first time. Tolerability to treatment was evaluated by a 0–10 numeric rating scale (0: worst possible, 10: optimal tolerability). We assessed the presence of AEs by using a standardized questionnaire. Treatment response was based on the 50 and 75% responder rate between weeks 20 and 24, compared with the baseline, according to headache diaries. We analyzed whether the tolerability was associated with a higher frequency of AEs or a higher probability of clinical response. We included 105 patients, 87.7% female, with an age of 43.9 ± 10.7 years. Mean tolerability was 7.8/10 and 7.2/10 in the first and second onabotA administration, respectively. AEs were reported by (first-second) 71.4–68.6% patients. The percentage of patients with a 50% response was 56.3%. There was no association between tolerability and AEs’ occurrence or clinical response. MDPI 2022-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9783903/ /pubmed/36548746 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins14120850 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
García-Azorín, David
Martínez, Blanca
Gutiérrez, María
Ruiz-Piñero, Marina
Echavarría, Ana
Sierra, Álvaro
Guerrero, Ángel L.
Real-World Evaluation of the Tolerability to Onabotulinum Toxin A: The RETO Study
title Real-World Evaluation of the Tolerability to Onabotulinum Toxin A: The RETO Study
title_full Real-World Evaluation of the Tolerability to Onabotulinum Toxin A: The RETO Study
title_fullStr Real-World Evaluation of the Tolerability to Onabotulinum Toxin A: The RETO Study
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Evaluation of the Tolerability to Onabotulinum Toxin A: The RETO Study
title_short Real-World Evaluation of the Tolerability to Onabotulinum Toxin A: The RETO Study
title_sort real-world evaluation of the tolerability to onabotulinum toxin a: the reto study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9783903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548746
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins14120850
work_keys_str_mv AT garciaazorindavid realworldevaluationofthetolerabilitytoonabotulinumtoxinatheretostudy
AT martinezblanca realworldevaluationofthetolerabilitytoonabotulinumtoxinatheretostudy
AT gutierrezmaria realworldevaluationofthetolerabilitytoonabotulinumtoxinatheretostudy
AT ruizpineromarina realworldevaluationofthetolerabilitytoonabotulinumtoxinatheretostudy
AT echavarriaana realworldevaluationofthetolerabilitytoonabotulinumtoxinatheretostudy
AT sierraalvaro realworldevaluationofthetolerabilitytoonabotulinumtoxinatheretostudy
AT guerreroangell realworldevaluationofthetolerabilitytoonabotulinumtoxinatheretostudy