Cargando…
Lack of systematicity in research prioritisation processes — a scoping review of evidence syntheses
BACKGROUND: A systematically and transparently prepared research priority-setting process within a specific scientific area is essential in order to develop a comprehensive and progressive evidence-based approach that will have a substantial societal impact on the site of interest. On the basis of t...
Autores principales: | Lund, Hans, Tang, Lars, Poulsen, Ingrid, la Cour, Karen, Bjerrum, Merete, Nielsen, Claus Vinther, Maribo, Thomas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9784020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02149-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Rehabilitation Research in Denmark Between 2001 and 2020: A Scoping Review
por: Momsen, Anne-Mette Hedeager, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
What Does It Take for Research to Be Rehabilitation Research?
por: Aadal, Lena, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Bridging Inequity Gaps in Healthcare Systems While Educating Future Healthcare Professionals—The Social Health Bridge-Building Programme
por: Valentin, Gitte, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
ICF-Based Assessment of Functioning in Daily Clinical Practice. A Promising Direction Toward Patient-Centred Care in Patients With Low Back Pain
por: Ibsen, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The patient education strategy “learning and coping” improves adherence to cardiac rehabilitation in primary healthcare settings: a pragmatic cluster-controlled trial
por: Pedersen, Charlotte Gjørup, et al.
Publicado: (2022)