Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of Tomosynthesis, Digital Mammography and a Dedicated Digital Specimen Radiography System Versus Pathological Assessment of Excised Breast Lesions

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the performance of full-field digital mammography (FFDM), digital breast tomosynthesis and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system (SRS) in consecutive patients, and to compare the margin status of resected lesions versus pathological assessmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almasarweh, Sa’ed, Sudah, Mazen, Okuma, Hidemi, Joukainen, Sarianna, Kärjä, Vesa, Vanninen, Ritva, Masarwah, Amro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9784367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36226804
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0036
_version_ 1784857794370863104
author Almasarweh, Sa’ed
Sudah, Mazen
Okuma, Hidemi
Joukainen, Sarianna
Kärjä, Vesa
Vanninen, Ritva
Masarwah, Amro
author_facet Almasarweh, Sa’ed
Sudah, Mazen
Okuma, Hidemi
Joukainen, Sarianna
Kärjä, Vesa
Vanninen, Ritva
Masarwah, Amro
author_sort Almasarweh, Sa’ed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the performance of full-field digital mammography (FFDM), digital breast tomosynthesis and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system (SRS) in consecutive patients, and to compare the margin status of resected lesions versus pathological assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Resected tissue specimens from consecutive patients who underwent intraoperative breast specimen assessment following wide local excision or oncoplastic breast conservative surgery were examined by FFDM, tomosynthesis and SRS. Two independent observers retrospectively evaluated the visibility of lesions, size, margins, spiculations, calcifications and diagnostic certainty, and chose the best performing method in a blinded manner. RESULTS: We evaluated 216 specimens from 204 patients. All target malignant lesions were removed with no tumouron-ink. One papilloma had positive microscopic margins and one patient underwent reoperation owing to extensive in situ components. There were no significant differences in measured lesion size among the three methods. However, tomosynthesis was the most accurate modality when compared with the final pathological report. Both observers reported that tomosynthesis had significantly better lesion visibility than SRS and FFDM, which translated into a significantly greater diagnostic certainty. Tomosynthesis was superior to the other two methods in identifying spiculations and calcifications. Both observers reported that tomosynthesis was the best performing method in 76.9% of cases. The interobserver reproducibilities of lesion visibility and diagnostic certainty were high for all three methods. CONCLUSIONS: Tomosynthesis was superior to SRS and FFDM for detecting and evaluating the target lesions, spiculations and calcifications, and was therefore more reliable for assessing complete excision of breast lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9784367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97843672022-12-31 Diagnostic Performance of Tomosynthesis, Digital Mammography and a Dedicated Digital Specimen Radiography System Versus Pathological Assessment of Excised Breast Lesions Almasarweh, Sa’ed Sudah, Mazen Okuma, Hidemi Joukainen, Sarianna Kärjä, Vesa Vanninen, Ritva Masarwah, Amro Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the performance of full-field digital mammography (FFDM), digital breast tomosynthesis and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system (SRS) in consecutive patients, and to compare the margin status of resected lesions versus pathological assessment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Resected tissue specimens from consecutive patients who underwent intraoperative breast specimen assessment following wide local excision or oncoplastic breast conservative surgery were examined by FFDM, tomosynthesis and SRS. Two independent observers retrospectively evaluated the visibility of lesions, size, margins, spiculations, calcifications and diagnostic certainty, and chose the best performing method in a blinded manner. RESULTS: We evaluated 216 specimens from 204 patients. All target malignant lesions were removed with no tumouron-ink. One papilloma had positive microscopic margins and one patient underwent reoperation owing to extensive in situ components. There were no significant differences in measured lesion size among the three methods. However, tomosynthesis was the most accurate modality when compared with the final pathological report. Both observers reported that tomosynthesis had significantly better lesion visibility than SRS and FFDM, which translated into a significantly greater diagnostic certainty. Tomosynthesis was superior to the other two methods in identifying spiculations and calcifications. Both observers reported that tomosynthesis was the best performing method in 76.9% of cases. The interobserver reproducibilities of lesion visibility and diagnostic certainty were high for all three methods. CONCLUSIONS: Tomosynthesis was superior to SRS and FFDM for detecting and evaluating the target lesions, spiculations and calcifications, and was therefore more reliable for assessing complete excision of breast lesions. Sciendo 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9784367/ /pubmed/36226804 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0036 Text en © 2022 Sa’ed Almasarweh, Mazen Sudah, Hidemi Okuma, Sarianna Joukainen, Vesa Kärjä, Ritva Vanninen, Amro Masarwah, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Almasarweh, Sa’ed
Sudah, Mazen
Okuma, Hidemi
Joukainen, Sarianna
Kärjä, Vesa
Vanninen, Ritva
Masarwah, Amro
Diagnostic Performance of Tomosynthesis, Digital Mammography and a Dedicated Digital Specimen Radiography System Versus Pathological Assessment of Excised Breast Lesions
title Diagnostic Performance of Tomosynthesis, Digital Mammography and a Dedicated Digital Specimen Radiography System Versus Pathological Assessment of Excised Breast Lesions
title_full Diagnostic Performance of Tomosynthesis, Digital Mammography and a Dedicated Digital Specimen Radiography System Versus Pathological Assessment of Excised Breast Lesions
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of Tomosynthesis, Digital Mammography and a Dedicated Digital Specimen Radiography System Versus Pathological Assessment of Excised Breast Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of Tomosynthesis, Digital Mammography and a Dedicated Digital Specimen Radiography System Versus Pathological Assessment of Excised Breast Lesions
title_short Diagnostic Performance of Tomosynthesis, Digital Mammography and a Dedicated Digital Specimen Radiography System Versus Pathological Assessment of Excised Breast Lesions
title_sort diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis, digital mammography and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system versus pathological assessment of excised breast lesions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9784367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36226804
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0036
work_keys_str_mv AT almasarwehsaed diagnosticperformanceoftomosynthesisdigitalmammographyandadedicateddigitalspecimenradiographysystemversuspathologicalassessmentofexcisedbreastlesions
AT sudahmazen diagnosticperformanceoftomosynthesisdigitalmammographyandadedicateddigitalspecimenradiographysystemversuspathologicalassessmentofexcisedbreastlesions
AT okumahidemi diagnosticperformanceoftomosynthesisdigitalmammographyandadedicateddigitalspecimenradiographysystemversuspathologicalassessmentofexcisedbreastlesions
AT joukainensarianna diagnosticperformanceoftomosynthesisdigitalmammographyandadedicateddigitalspecimenradiographysystemversuspathologicalassessmentofexcisedbreastlesions
AT karjavesa diagnosticperformanceoftomosynthesisdigitalmammographyandadedicateddigitalspecimenradiographysystemversuspathologicalassessmentofexcisedbreastlesions
AT vanninenritva diagnosticperformanceoftomosynthesisdigitalmammographyandadedicateddigitalspecimenradiographysystemversuspathologicalassessmentofexcisedbreastlesions
AT masarwahamro diagnosticperformanceoftomosynthesisdigitalmammographyandadedicateddigitalspecimenradiographysystemversuspathologicalassessmentofexcisedbreastlesions