Cargando…
MUPS Tableting—Comparison between Crospovidone and Microcrystalline Cellulose Core Pellets
Multi-unit pellet system (MUPS) tablets were fabricated by compacting drug-loaded pellets of either crospovidone or microcrystalline cellulose core. These pellets were produced by extrusion-spheronization and coated with ethylcellulose (EC) for a sustained drug release function. Coat damage due to t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36559308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14122812 |
_version_ | 1784857953218592768 |
---|---|
author | Thio, Daniel Robin Heng, Paul Wan Sia Chan, Lai Wah |
author_facet | Thio, Daniel Robin Heng, Paul Wan Sia Chan, Lai Wah |
author_sort | Thio, Daniel Robin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multi-unit pellet system (MUPS) tablets were fabricated by compacting drug-loaded pellets of either crospovidone or microcrystalline cellulose core. These pellets were produced by extrusion-spheronization and coated with ethylcellulose (EC) for a sustained drug release function. Coat damage due to the MUPS tableting process could undermine the sustained release function of the EC-coated pellets. Deformability of the pellet core is a factor that can impact the extent of pellet coat damage. Thus, this study was designed to evaluate the relative performance of drug-loaded pellets prepared with either microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) or crospovidone (XPVP) as a spheronization aid and were comparatively evaluated for their ability to withstand EC pellet coat damage when compacted. These pellets were tableted at various compaction pressures and pellet volume fractions. The extent of pellet coat damage was assessed by the change in drug release after compaction. The findings from this study demonstrated that pellets spheronized with XPVP had slightly less favorable physical properties and experienced comparatively more pellet coat damage than the pellets with MCC. However, MUPS tablets of reasonable quality could successfully be produced from pellets with XPVP, albeit their performance did not match that of vastly mechanically stronger pellets with MCC at higher compaction pressure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9785026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97850262022-12-24 MUPS Tableting—Comparison between Crospovidone and Microcrystalline Cellulose Core Pellets Thio, Daniel Robin Heng, Paul Wan Sia Chan, Lai Wah Pharmaceutics Article Multi-unit pellet system (MUPS) tablets were fabricated by compacting drug-loaded pellets of either crospovidone or microcrystalline cellulose core. These pellets were produced by extrusion-spheronization and coated with ethylcellulose (EC) for a sustained drug release function. Coat damage due to the MUPS tableting process could undermine the sustained release function of the EC-coated pellets. Deformability of the pellet core is a factor that can impact the extent of pellet coat damage. Thus, this study was designed to evaluate the relative performance of drug-loaded pellets prepared with either microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) or crospovidone (XPVP) as a spheronization aid and were comparatively evaluated for their ability to withstand EC pellet coat damage when compacted. These pellets were tableted at various compaction pressures and pellet volume fractions. The extent of pellet coat damage was assessed by the change in drug release after compaction. The findings from this study demonstrated that pellets spheronized with XPVP had slightly less favorable physical properties and experienced comparatively more pellet coat damage than the pellets with MCC. However, MUPS tablets of reasonable quality could successfully be produced from pellets with XPVP, albeit their performance did not match that of vastly mechanically stronger pellets with MCC at higher compaction pressure. MDPI 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9785026/ /pubmed/36559308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14122812 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Thio, Daniel Robin Heng, Paul Wan Sia Chan, Lai Wah MUPS Tableting—Comparison between Crospovidone and Microcrystalline Cellulose Core Pellets |
title | MUPS Tableting—Comparison between Crospovidone and Microcrystalline Cellulose Core Pellets |
title_full | MUPS Tableting—Comparison between Crospovidone and Microcrystalline Cellulose Core Pellets |
title_fullStr | MUPS Tableting—Comparison between Crospovidone and Microcrystalline Cellulose Core Pellets |
title_full_unstemmed | MUPS Tableting—Comparison between Crospovidone and Microcrystalline Cellulose Core Pellets |
title_short | MUPS Tableting—Comparison between Crospovidone and Microcrystalline Cellulose Core Pellets |
title_sort | mups tableting—comparison between crospovidone and microcrystalline cellulose core pellets |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36559308 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14122812 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thiodanielrobin mupstabletingcomparisonbetweencrospovidoneandmicrocrystallinecellulosecorepellets AT hengpaulwansia mupstabletingcomparisonbetweencrospovidoneandmicrocrystallinecellulosecorepellets AT chanlaiwah mupstabletingcomparisonbetweencrospovidoneandmicrocrystallinecellulosecorepellets |