Cargando…
Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
Genomic tests are being developed for use in cancer screening. As most screening is offered in primary care settings, primary care provider and patient perceptions of such tests are likely to affect uptake. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize information on factors likely to affect patient a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122044 |
_version_ | 1784857975537532928 |
---|---|
author | Davis, Kaitlyn V. Hallman, Mie H. DiCarlo, Melissa Wambua, Sophie M. Jaffe, Rachel L. Welsh, Allison W. Kerber, Cameron Yang, Hushan Chambers, Christopher V. Myers, Ronald E. |
author_facet | Davis, Kaitlyn V. Hallman, Mie H. DiCarlo, Melissa Wambua, Sophie M. Jaffe, Rachel L. Welsh, Allison W. Kerber, Cameron Yang, Hushan Chambers, Christopher V. Myers, Ronald E. |
author_sort | Davis, Kaitlyn V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomic tests are being developed for use in cancer screening. As most screening is offered in primary care settings, primary care provider and patient perceptions of such tests are likely to affect uptake. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize information on factors likely to affect patient and provider use of biospecimen collection and analysis for cancer screening, methods referred to as liquid biopsy or multi-cancer early detection (MCED) testing when used to detect multiple cancers. We ultimately identified 7 articles for review and analyzed them for major themes. None reported on primary care provider perspectives. Six articles focused on patient perceptions about testing for a single cancer (colorectal), and 1 reported on patient views related to testing for multiple cancers. Factors favoring this type of testing included its non-invasiveness, and the perceived safety, convenience, and effectiveness of testing. There is a dearth of information in the literature on primary care provider perceptions about liquid biopsy and MCED testing. The limited information on patient perceptions suggests that they are receptive to such tests. Research on primary care provider and patient test-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior is needed to guide future implementation in primary care settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9785136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97851362022-12-24 Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review Davis, Kaitlyn V. Hallman, Mie H. DiCarlo, Melissa Wambua, Sophie M. Jaffe, Rachel L. Welsh, Allison W. Kerber, Cameron Yang, Hushan Chambers, Christopher V. Myers, Ronald E. J Pers Med Review Genomic tests are being developed for use in cancer screening. As most screening is offered in primary care settings, primary care provider and patient perceptions of such tests are likely to affect uptake. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize information on factors likely to affect patient and provider use of biospecimen collection and analysis for cancer screening, methods referred to as liquid biopsy or multi-cancer early detection (MCED) testing when used to detect multiple cancers. We ultimately identified 7 articles for review and analyzed them for major themes. None reported on primary care provider perspectives. Six articles focused on patient perceptions about testing for a single cancer (colorectal), and 1 reported on patient views related to testing for multiple cancers. Factors favoring this type of testing included its non-invasiveness, and the perceived safety, convenience, and effectiveness of testing. There is a dearth of information in the literature on primary care provider perceptions about liquid biopsy and MCED testing. The limited information on patient perceptions suggests that they are receptive to such tests. Research on primary care provider and patient test-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior is needed to guide future implementation in primary care settings. MDPI 2022-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9785136/ /pubmed/36556264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122044 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Davis, Kaitlyn V. Hallman, Mie H. DiCarlo, Melissa Wambua, Sophie M. Jaffe, Rachel L. Welsh, Allison W. Kerber, Cameron Yang, Hushan Chambers, Christopher V. Myers, Ronald E. Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review |
title | Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | factors likely to affect the uptake of genomic approaches to cancer screening in primary care: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daviskaitlynv factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview AT hallmanmieh factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview AT dicarlomelissa factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview AT wambuasophiem factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview AT jafferachell factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview AT welshallisonw factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview AT kerbercameron factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview AT yanghushan factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview AT chamberschristopherv factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview AT myersronalde factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview |