Cargando…

Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review

Genomic tests are being developed for use in cancer screening. As most screening is offered in primary care settings, primary care provider and patient perceptions of such tests are likely to affect uptake. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize information on factors likely to affect patient a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Kaitlyn V., Hallman, Mie H., DiCarlo, Melissa, Wambua, Sophie M., Jaffe, Rachel L., Welsh, Allison W., Kerber, Cameron, Yang, Hushan, Chambers, Christopher V., Myers, Ronald E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556264
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122044
_version_ 1784857975537532928
author Davis, Kaitlyn V.
Hallman, Mie H.
DiCarlo, Melissa
Wambua, Sophie M.
Jaffe, Rachel L.
Welsh, Allison W.
Kerber, Cameron
Yang, Hushan
Chambers, Christopher V.
Myers, Ronald E.
author_facet Davis, Kaitlyn V.
Hallman, Mie H.
DiCarlo, Melissa
Wambua, Sophie M.
Jaffe, Rachel L.
Welsh, Allison W.
Kerber, Cameron
Yang, Hushan
Chambers, Christopher V.
Myers, Ronald E.
author_sort Davis, Kaitlyn V.
collection PubMed
description Genomic tests are being developed for use in cancer screening. As most screening is offered in primary care settings, primary care provider and patient perceptions of such tests are likely to affect uptake. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize information on factors likely to affect patient and provider use of biospecimen collection and analysis for cancer screening, methods referred to as liquid biopsy or multi-cancer early detection (MCED) testing when used to detect multiple cancers. We ultimately identified 7 articles for review and analyzed them for major themes. None reported on primary care provider perspectives. Six articles focused on patient perceptions about testing for a single cancer (colorectal), and 1 reported on patient views related to testing for multiple cancers. Factors favoring this type of testing included its non-invasiveness, and the perceived safety, convenience, and effectiveness of testing. There is a dearth of information in the literature on primary care provider perceptions about liquid biopsy and MCED testing. The limited information on patient perceptions suggests that they are receptive to such tests. Research on primary care provider and patient test-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior is needed to guide future implementation in primary care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9785136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97851362022-12-24 Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review Davis, Kaitlyn V. Hallman, Mie H. DiCarlo, Melissa Wambua, Sophie M. Jaffe, Rachel L. Welsh, Allison W. Kerber, Cameron Yang, Hushan Chambers, Christopher V. Myers, Ronald E. J Pers Med Review Genomic tests are being developed for use in cancer screening. As most screening is offered in primary care settings, primary care provider and patient perceptions of such tests are likely to affect uptake. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize information on factors likely to affect patient and provider use of biospecimen collection and analysis for cancer screening, methods referred to as liquid biopsy or multi-cancer early detection (MCED) testing when used to detect multiple cancers. We ultimately identified 7 articles for review and analyzed them for major themes. None reported on primary care provider perspectives. Six articles focused on patient perceptions about testing for a single cancer (colorectal), and 1 reported on patient views related to testing for multiple cancers. Factors favoring this type of testing included its non-invasiveness, and the perceived safety, convenience, and effectiveness of testing. There is a dearth of information in the literature on primary care provider perceptions about liquid biopsy and MCED testing. The limited information on patient perceptions suggests that they are receptive to such tests. Research on primary care provider and patient test-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior is needed to guide future implementation in primary care settings. MDPI 2022-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9785136/ /pubmed/36556264 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122044 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Davis, Kaitlyn V.
Hallman, Mie H.
DiCarlo, Melissa
Wambua, Sophie M.
Jaffe, Rachel L.
Welsh, Allison W.
Kerber, Cameron
Yang, Hushan
Chambers, Christopher V.
Myers, Ronald E.
Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
title Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
title_full Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
title_short Factors Likely to Affect the Uptake of Genomic Approaches to Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
title_sort factors likely to affect the uptake of genomic approaches to cancer screening in primary care: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556264
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122044
work_keys_str_mv AT daviskaitlynv factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview
AT hallmanmieh factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview
AT dicarlomelissa factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview
AT wambuasophiem factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview
AT jafferachell factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview
AT welshallisonw factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview
AT kerbercameron factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview
AT yanghushan factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview
AT chamberschristopherv factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview
AT myersronalde factorslikelytoaffecttheuptakeofgenomicapproachestocancerscreeninginprimarycareascopingreview