Cargando…

Molecular profile of patients with myelofibrosis: a 10-year experience

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the karyotype test and myeloid panel with next-generation sequencing findings in patients with myelofibrosis, and to compare transplant characteristics in patients referred for bone marrow transplantation. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center study with patients diagnosed with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dias, Lara Faria Souza, Pereira, Carolina Leme de Moura, Centurião, Newton de Freitas, do Nascimento, Jade Zezzi Martins, Ribeiro, Andreza Alice Feitosa, Hamerschlak, Nelson, Marques, Carolina Perrone, de Lima, Ana Carolina Vieira, da Costa, Luana Nóbrega, da Silva, Anderson Felipe, Lima, Viviane de Jesus Torres, Kerbauy, Mariana Nassif, Kerbauy, Lucila Nassif, Arcuri, Leonardo Javier, Campregher, Paulo Vidal, da Rocha, Juliana Dall´Agnol, Datoguia, Tarcila Santos, Santos, Fabio Pires de Souza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36629680
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0100
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To analyze the karyotype test and myeloid panel with next-generation sequencing findings in patients with myelofibrosis, and to compare transplant characteristics in patients referred for bone marrow transplantation. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center study with patients diagnosed with myelofibrosis treated at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients with myelofibrosis were examined. Patients who had not been submitted to tests in our service were excluded. The final sample comprised 69 patients. Of these 69, 56 were submitted to karyotyping and 22 to myeloid panel with next-generation sequencing. Karyotype was normal in 60% of the patients and altered in 40%. The prevalence of high-risk molecular mutations was higher in patients referred for bone marrow transplantation (100% versus 50%). The median follow-up of transplant patients was 2.4 years and the overall survival at 2 years was 80% (95%CI: 62-100%). CONCLUSION: The molecular analysis enables estimating the patient’s risk and thus instituting more aggressive treatment such as bone marrow transplant for patients at higher risk, being a relevant tool to guide therapy. Given the significance of molecular analysis for therapeutic decision-making in myelofibrosis, collection and disclosure of data on the prevalence of cytogenetic changes and findings of next-generation sequencing in affected patients is important.