Cargando…

Repair Bond Strength of Conventionally and Digitally Fabricated Denture Base Resins to Auto-Polymerized Acrylic Resin: Surface Treatment Effects In Vitro

Denture base fracture is one of the most annoying problems for both prosthodontists and patients. Denture repair is considered to be an appropriate solution rather than fabricating a new denture. Digital denture fabrication is widely spreading nowadays. However, the repair strength of CAD-CAM milled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gad, Mohammed M., Albazroun, Zainab, Aldajani, Fatimah, Elakel, Ahmed M., El Zayat, Mai, Akhtar, Sultan, Khan, Soban Q., Ali, Saqib, Rahoma, Ahmed M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556867
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15249062
_version_ 1784858096636526592
author Gad, Mohammed M.
Albazroun, Zainab
Aldajani, Fatimah
Elakel, Ahmed M.
El Zayat, Mai
Akhtar, Sultan
Khan, Soban Q.
Ali, Saqib
Rahoma, Ahmed M.
author_facet Gad, Mohammed M.
Albazroun, Zainab
Aldajani, Fatimah
Elakel, Ahmed M.
El Zayat, Mai
Akhtar, Sultan
Khan, Soban Q.
Ali, Saqib
Rahoma, Ahmed M.
author_sort Gad, Mohammed M.
collection PubMed
description Denture base fracture is one of the most annoying problems for both prosthodontists and patients. Denture repair is considered to be an appropriate solution rather than fabricating a new denture. Digital denture fabrication is widely spreading nowadays. However, the repair strength of CAD-CAM milled and 3D-printed resins is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength (SBS) of conventionally and digitally fabricated denture base resins. One l heat-polymerized (Major base20), two milled (IvoCad, AvaDent), and three 3D-printed (ASIGA, NextDent, FormLabs) denture base resins were used to fabricate 10 × 10 × 3.3 acrylic specimens (N = 180, 30/resin, n = 10). Specimens were divided into three groups according to surface treatment; no treatment (control), monomer application (MMA), or sandblasting (SB) surface treatments were performed. Repair resin was bonded to the resin surface followed by thermocycling (5000 cycles). SBS was tested using a universal testing machine where a load was applied at the resin interface (0.5 mm/min). Data were collected and analyzed using ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). SEM was used for failure type and topography of fractured surfaces analysis. The heat-polymerized and CAD-CAM milled groups showed close SBS values without significance (p > 0.05), while the 3D-printed resin groups showed a significant decrease in SBS (p < 0.0001). SBS increased significantly with monomer application (p < 0.0001) except for the ASIGA and NextDent groups, which showed no significant difference compared to the control groups (p > 0.05). All materials with SB surface treatment showed a significant increase in SBS when compared with the controls and MMA application (p < 0.0001). Adhesive failure type was observed in the control groups, which dramatically changed to cohesive or mixed in groups with surface treatment. The SBS of 3D-printed resin was decreased when compared with the conventional and CAD-CAM milled resin. Regardless of the material type, SB and MMA applications increased the SBS of the repaired resin and SB showed high performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9785635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97856352022-12-24 Repair Bond Strength of Conventionally and Digitally Fabricated Denture Base Resins to Auto-Polymerized Acrylic Resin: Surface Treatment Effects In Vitro Gad, Mohammed M. Albazroun, Zainab Aldajani, Fatimah Elakel, Ahmed M. El Zayat, Mai Akhtar, Sultan Khan, Soban Q. Ali, Saqib Rahoma, Ahmed M. Materials (Basel) Article Denture base fracture is one of the most annoying problems for both prosthodontists and patients. Denture repair is considered to be an appropriate solution rather than fabricating a new denture. Digital denture fabrication is widely spreading nowadays. However, the repair strength of CAD-CAM milled and 3D-printed resins is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength (SBS) of conventionally and digitally fabricated denture base resins. One l heat-polymerized (Major base20), two milled (IvoCad, AvaDent), and three 3D-printed (ASIGA, NextDent, FormLabs) denture base resins were used to fabricate 10 × 10 × 3.3 acrylic specimens (N = 180, 30/resin, n = 10). Specimens were divided into three groups according to surface treatment; no treatment (control), monomer application (MMA), or sandblasting (SB) surface treatments were performed. Repair resin was bonded to the resin surface followed by thermocycling (5000 cycles). SBS was tested using a universal testing machine where a load was applied at the resin interface (0.5 mm/min). Data were collected and analyzed using ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). SEM was used for failure type and topography of fractured surfaces analysis. The heat-polymerized and CAD-CAM milled groups showed close SBS values without significance (p > 0.05), while the 3D-printed resin groups showed a significant decrease in SBS (p < 0.0001). SBS increased significantly with monomer application (p < 0.0001) except for the ASIGA and NextDent groups, which showed no significant difference compared to the control groups (p > 0.05). All materials with SB surface treatment showed a significant increase in SBS when compared with the controls and MMA application (p < 0.0001). Adhesive failure type was observed in the control groups, which dramatically changed to cohesive or mixed in groups with surface treatment. The SBS of 3D-printed resin was decreased when compared with the conventional and CAD-CAM milled resin. Regardless of the material type, SB and MMA applications increased the SBS of the repaired resin and SB showed high performance. MDPI 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9785635/ /pubmed/36556867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15249062 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gad, Mohammed M.
Albazroun, Zainab
Aldajani, Fatimah
Elakel, Ahmed M.
El Zayat, Mai
Akhtar, Sultan
Khan, Soban Q.
Ali, Saqib
Rahoma, Ahmed M.
Repair Bond Strength of Conventionally and Digitally Fabricated Denture Base Resins to Auto-Polymerized Acrylic Resin: Surface Treatment Effects In Vitro
title Repair Bond Strength of Conventionally and Digitally Fabricated Denture Base Resins to Auto-Polymerized Acrylic Resin: Surface Treatment Effects In Vitro
title_full Repair Bond Strength of Conventionally and Digitally Fabricated Denture Base Resins to Auto-Polymerized Acrylic Resin: Surface Treatment Effects In Vitro
title_fullStr Repair Bond Strength of Conventionally and Digitally Fabricated Denture Base Resins to Auto-Polymerized Acrylic Resin: Surface Treatment Effects In Vitro
title_full_unstemmed Repair Bond Strength of Conventionally and Digitally Fabricated Denture Base Resins to Auto-Polymerized Acrylic Resin: Surface Treatment Effects In Vitro
title_short Repair Bond Strength of Conventionally and Digitally Fabricated Denture Base Resins to Auto-Polymerized Acrylic Resin: Surface Treatment Effects In Vitro
title_sort repair bond strength of conventionally and digitally fabricated denture base resins to auto-polymerized acrylic resin: surface treatment effects in vitro
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556867
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15249062
work_keys_str_mv AT gadmohammedm repairbondstrengthofconventionallyanddigitallyfabricateddenturebaseresinstoautopolymerizedacrylicresinsurfacetreatmenteffectsinvitro
AT albazrounzainab repairbondstrengthofconventionallyanddigitallyfabricateddenturebaseresinstoautopolymerizedacrylicresinsurfacetreatmenteffectsinvitro
AT aldajanifatimah repairbondstrengthofconventionallyanddigitallyfabricateddenturebaseresinstoautopolymerizedacrylicresinsurfacetreatmenteffectsinvitro
AT elakelahmedm repairbondstrengthofconventionallyanddigitallyfabricateddenturebaseresinstoautopolymerizedacrylicresinsurfacetreatmenteffectsinvitro
AT elzayatmai repairbondstrengthofconventionallyanddigitallyfabricateddenturebaseresinstoautopolymerizedacrylicresinsurfacetreatmenteffectsinvitro
AT akhtarsultan repairbondstrengthofconventionallyanddigitallyfabricateddenturebaseresinstoautopolymerizedacrylicresinsurfacetreatmenteffectsinvitro
AT khansobanq repairbondstrengthofconventionallyanddigitallyfabricateddenturebaseresinstoautopolymerizedacrylicresinsurfacetreatmenteffectsinvitro
AT alisaqib repairbondstrengthofconventionallyanddigitallyfabricateddenturebaseresinstoautopolymerizedacrylicresinsurfacetreatmenteffectsinvitro
AT rahomaahmedm repairbondstrengthofconventionallyanddigitallyfabricateddenturebaseresinstoautopolymerizedacrylicresinsurfacetreatmenteffectsinvitro