Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model

Growing evidence suggests that artificial intelligence tools could help radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 pneumonia from other types of viral (non-COVID-19) pneumonia. To test this hypothesis, an R-AI classifier capable of discriminating between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia was develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rizzetto, Francesco, Berta, Luca, Zorzi, Giulia, Cincotta, Antonino, Travaglini, Francesca, Artioli, Diana, Nerini Molteni, Silvia, Vismara, Chiara, Scaglione, Francesco, Torresin, Alberto, Colombo, Paola Enrica, Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro, Vanzulli, Angelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548527
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060235
_version_ 1784858135861657600
author Rizzetto, Francesco
Berta, Luca
Zorzi, Giulia
Cincotta, Antonino
Travaglini, Francesca
Artioli, Diana
Nerini Molteni, Silvia
Vismara, Chiara
Scaglione, Francesco
Torresin, Alberto
Colombo, Paola Enrica
Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro
Vanzulli, Angelo
author_facet Rizzetto, Francesco
Berta, Luca
Zorzi, Giulia
Cincotta, Antonino
Travaglini, Francesca
Artioli, Diana
Nerini Molteni, Silvia
Vismara, Chiara
Scaglione, Francesco
Torresin, Alberto
Colombo, Paola Enrica
Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro
Vanzulli, Angelo
author_sort Rizzetto, Francesco
collection PubMed
description Growing evidence suggests that artificial intelligence tools could help radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 pneumonia from other types of viral (non-COVID-19) pneumonia. To test this hypothesis, an R-AI classifier capable of discriminating between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia was developed using CT chest scans of 1031 patients with positive swab for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 647) and other respiratory viruses (n = 384). The model was trained with 811 CT scans, while 220 CT scans (n = 151 COVID-19; n = 69 non-COVID-19) were used for independent validation. Four readers were enrolled to blindly evaluate the validation dataset using the CO-RADS score. A pandemic-like high suspicion scenario (CO-RADS 3 considered as COVID-19) and a low suspicion scenario (CO-RADS 3 considered as non-COVID-19) were simulated. Inter-reader agreement and performance metrics were calculated for human readers and R-AI classifier. The readers showed good agreement in assigning CO-RADS score (Gwet’s AC2 = 0.71, p < 0.001). Considering human performance, accuracy = 78% and accuracy = 74% were obtained in the high and low suspicion scenarios, respectively, while the AI classifier achieved accuracy = 79% in distinguishing COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 pneumonia on the independent validation dataset. The R-AI classifier performance was equivalent or superior to human readers in all comparisons. Therefore, a R-AI classifier may support human readers in the difficult task of distinguishing COVID-19 from other types of viral pneumonia on CT imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9785796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97857962022-12-24 Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model Rizzetto, Francesco Berta, Luca Zorzi, Giulia Cincotta, Antonino Travaglini, Francesca Artioli, Diana Nerini Molteni, Silvia Vismara, Chiara Scaglione, Francesco Torresin, Alberto Colombo, Paola Enrica Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro Vanzulli, Angelo Tomography Article Growing evidence suggests that artificial intelligence tools could help radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 pneumonia from other types of viral (non-COVID-19) pneumonia. To test this hypothesis, an R-AI classifier capable of discriminating between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia was developed using CT chest scans of 1031 patients with positive swab for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 647) and other respiratory viruses (n = 384). The model was trained with 811 CT scans, while 220 CT scans (n = 151 COVID-19; n = 69 non-COVID-19) were used for independent validation. Four readers were enrolled to blindly evaluate the validation dataset using the CO-RADS score. A pandemic-like high suspicion scenario (CO-RADS 3 considered as COVID-19) and a low suspicion scenario (CO-RADS 3 considered as non-COVID-19) were simulated. Inter-reader agreement and performance metrics were calculated for human readers and R-AI classifier. The readers showed good agreement in assigning CO-RADS score (Gwet’s AC2 = 0.71, p < 0.001). Considering human performance, accuracy = 78% and accuracy = 74% were obtained in the high and low suspicion scenarios, respectively, while the AI classifier achieved accuracy = 79% in distinguishing COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 pneumonia on the independent validation dataset. The R-AI classifier performance was equivalent or superior to human readers in all comparisons. Therefore, a R-AI classifier may support human readers in the difficult task of distinguishing COVID-19 from other types of viral pneumonia on CT imaging. MDPI 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9785796/ /pubmed/36548527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060235 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rizzetto, Francesco
Berta, Luca
Zorzi, Giulia
Cincotta, Antonino
Travaglini, Francesca
Artioli, Diana
Nerini Molteni, Silvia
Vismara, Chiara
Scaglione, Francesco
Torresin, Alberto
Colombo, Paola Enrica
Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro
Vanzulli, Angelo
Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model
title Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model
title_full Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model
title_short Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model
title_sort diagnostic performance in differentiating covid-19 from other viral pneumonias on ct imaging: multi-reader analysis compared with an artificial intelligence-based model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548527
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060235
work_keys_str_mv AT rizzettofrancesco diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT bertaluca diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT zorzigiulia diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT cincottaantonino diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT travaglinifrancesca diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT artiolidiana diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT nerinimoltenisilvia diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT vismarachiara diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT scaglionefrancesco diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT torresinalberto diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT colombopaolaenrica diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT carbonarolucaalessandro diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel
AT vanzulliangelo diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel