Cargando…
Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model
Growing evidence suggests that artificial intelligence tools could help radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 pneumonia from other types of viral (non-COVID-19) pneumonia. To test this hypothesis, an R-AI classifier capable of discriminating between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia was develop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060235 |
_version_ | 1784858135861657600 |
---|---|
author | Rizzetto, Francesco Berta, Luca Zorzi, Giulia Cincotta, Antonino Travaglini, Francesca Artioli, Diana Nerini Molteni, Silvia Vismara, Chiara Scaglione, Francesco Torresin, Alberto Colombo, Paola Enrica Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro Vanzulli, Angelo |
author_facet | Rizzetto, Francesco Berta, Luca Zorzi, Giulia Cincotta, Antonino Travaglini, Francesca Artioli, Diana Nerini Molteni, Silvia Vismara, Chiara Scaglione, Francesco Torresin, Alberto Colombo, Paola Enrica Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro Vanzulli, Angelo |
author_sort | Rizzetto, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Growing evidence suggests that artificial intelligence tools could help radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 pneumonia from other types of viral (non-COVID-19) pneumonia. To test this hypothesis, an R-AI classifier capable of discriminating between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia was developed using CT chest scans of 1031 patients with positive swab for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 647) and other respiratory viruses (n = 384). The model was trained with 811 CT scans, while 220 CT scans (n = 151 COVID-19; n = 69 non-COVID-19) were used for independent validation. Four readers were enrolled to blindly evaluate the validation dataset using the CO-RADS score. A pandemic-like high suspicion scenario (CO-RADS 3 considered as COVID-19) and a low suspicion scenario (CO-RADS 3 considered as non-COVID-19) were simulated. Inter-reader agreement and performance metrics were calculated for human readers and R-AI classifier. The readers showed good agreement in assigning CO-RADS score (Gwet’s AC2 = 0.71, p < 0.001). Considering human performance, accuracy = 78% and accuracy = 74% were obtained in the high and low suspicion scenarios, respectively, while the AI classifier achieved accuracy = 79% in distinguishing COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 pneumonia on the independent validation dataset. The R-AI classifier performance was equivalent or superior to human readers in all comparisons. Therefore, a R-AI classifier may support human readers in the difficult task of distinguishing COVID-19 from other types of viral pneumonia on CT imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9785796 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97857962022-12-24 Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model Rizzetto, Francesco Berta, Luca Zorzi, Giulia Cincotta, Antonino Travaglini, Francesca Artioli, Diana Nerini Molteni, Silvia Vismara, Chiara Scaglione, Francesco Torresin, Alberto Colombo, Paola Enrica Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro Vanzulli, Angelo Tomography Article Growing evidence suggests that artificial intelligence tools could help radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 pneumonia from other types of viral (non-COVID-19) pneumonia. To test this hypothesis, an R-AI classifier capable of discriminating between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia was developed using CT chest scans of 1031 patients with positive swab for SARS-CoV-2 (n = 647) and other respiratory viruses (n = 384). The model was trained with 811 CT scans, while 220 CT scans (n = 151 COVID-19; n = 69 non-COVID-19) were used for independent validation. Four readers were enrolled to blindly evaluate the validation dataset using the CO-RADS score. A pandemic-like high suspicion scenario (CO-RADS 3 considered as COVID-19) and a low suspicion scenario (CO-RADS 3 considered as non-COVID-19) were simulated. Inter-reader agreement and performance metrics were calculated for human readers and R-AI classifier. The readers showed good agreement in assigning CO-RADS score (Gwet’s AC2 = 0.71, p < 0.001). Considering human performance, accuracy = 78% and accuracy = 74% were obtained in the high and low suspicion scenarios, respectively, while the AI classifier achieved accuracy = 79% in distinguishing COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 pneumonia on the independent validation dataset. The R-AI classifier performance was equivalent or superior to human readers in all comparisons. Therefore, a R-AI classifier may support human readers in the difficult task of distinguishing COVID-19 from other types of viral pneumonia on CT imaging. MDPI 2022-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9785796/ /pubmed/36548527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060235 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rizzetto, Francesco Berta, Luca Zorzi, Giulia Cincotta, Antonino Travaglini, Francesca Artioli, Diana Nerini Molteni, Silvia Vismara, Chiara Scaglione, Francesco Torresin, Alberto Colombo, Paola Enrica Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro Vanzulli, Angelo Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model |
title | Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model |
title_full | Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model |
title_short | Diagnostic Performance in Differentiating COVID-19 from Other Viral Pneumonias on CT Imaging: Multi-Reader Analysis Compared with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Model |
title_sort | diagnostic performance in differentiating covid-19 from other viral pneumonias on ct imaging: multi-reader analysis compared with an artificial intelligence-based model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36548527 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography8060235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rizzettofrancesco diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT bertaluca diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT zorzigiulia diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT cincottaantonino diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT travaglinifrancesca diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT artiolidiana diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT nerinimoltenisilvia diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT vismarachiara diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT scaglionefrancesco diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT torresinalberto diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT colombopaolaenrica diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT carbonarolucaalessandro diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel AT vanzulliangelo diagnosticperformanceindifferentiatingcovid19fromotherviralpneumoniasonctimagingmultireaderanalysiscomparedwithanartificialintelligencebasedmodel |