Cargando…

Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study

Objectives: Fixed appliance treatment with premolar extraction is often required after functional appliance treatment to relieve crowding and improve facial aesthetics in the Asian population. This study compared the treatment efficacy of two approaches for treating Class II division 1 malocclusion:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Ka Fai, Chen, Wener, Ren, Jianhan, Yang, Yanqi, Lin, Yifan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247428
_version_ 1784858185287335936
author Wong, Ka Fai
Chen, Wener
Ren, Jianhan
Yang, Yanqi
Lin, Yifan
author_facet Wong, Ka Fai
Chen, Wener
Ren, Jianhan
Yang, Yanqi
Lin, Yifan
author_sort Wong, Ka Fai
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Fixed appliance treatment with premolar extraction is often required after functional appliance treatment to relieve crowding and improve facial aesthetics in the Asian population. This study compared the treatment efficacy of two approaches for treating Class II division 1 malocclusion: functional appliance followed by fixed appliance treatment with extraction (two-phase) and fixed appliance treatment with extraction (one-phase). Methods: Growing skeletal Class II patients with an overjet of ≥6 mm treated with two- or one-phase orthodontics were included. The two groups consisted of 29 patients (mean age = 12.55) and 30 patients (mean age = 12.72), respectively. Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms were analysed and skeletal, dental, and soft tissue characteristics were compared using independent t-tests. Treatment changes were compared within and between groups using paired and independent t-tests, respectively. Stepwise discriminant analysis was performed to identify the variables that best predicted pre-treatment group allocations. Results: At baseline, there were no significant between-group differences in age, gender, cervical vertebral maturation, or overjet. The two-phase group had greater Class II skeletal discrepancies (ANB angle and Wits appraisal). During treatment, the two-phase group showed greater improvements in intermaxillary relationship and facial convexity compared with the one-phase group (p < 0.01). Following treatment, the two-phase group had a greater L1/APog distance (p < 0.05). Facial convexity and Wits appraisal were identified as parameters significantly influencing the clinicians’ decision to use a one- or two-phase approach. Conclusions: In patients requiring premolar extraction, two-phase (vs. one-phase) treatment produced greater improvements in the intermaxillary relationship and facial convexity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9785998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97859982022-12-24 Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study Wong, Ka Fai Chen, Wener Ren, Jianhan Yang, Yanqi Lin, Yifan J Clin Med Article Objectives: Fixed appliance treatment with premolar extraction is often required after functional appliance treatment to relieve crowding and improve facial aesthetics in the Asian population. This study compared the treatment efficacy of two approaches for treating Class II division 1 malocclusion: functional appliance followed by fixed appliance treatment with extraction (two-phase) and fixed appliance treatment with extraction (one-phase). Methods: Growing skeletal Class II patients with an overjet of ≥6 mm treated with two- or one-phase orthodontics were included. The two groups consisted of 29 patients (mean age = 12.55) and 30 patients (mean age = 12.72), respectively. Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms were analysed and skeletal, dental, and soft tissue characteristics were compared using independent t-tests. Treatment changes were compared within and between groups using paired and independent t-tests, respectively. Stepwise discriminant analysis was performed to identify the variables that best predicted pre-treatment group allocations. Results: At baseline, there were no significant between-group differences in age, gender, cervical vertebral maturation, or overjet. The two-phase group had greater Class II skeletal discrepancies (ANB angle and Wits appraisal). During treatment, the two-phase group showed greater improvements in intermaxillary relationship and facial convexity compared with the one-phase group (p < 0.01). Following treatment, the two-phase group had a greater L1/APog distance (p < 0.05). Facial convexity and Wits appraisal were identified as parameters significantly influencing the clinicians’ decision to use a one- or two-phase approach. Conclusions: In patients requiring premolar extraction, two-phase (vs. one-phase) treatment produced greater improvements in the intermaxillary relationship and facial convexity. MDPI 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9785998/ /pubmed/36556044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247428 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wong, Ka Fai
Chen, Wener
Ren, Jianhan
Yang, Yanqi
Lin, Yifan
Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study
title Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study
title_full Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study
title_fullStr Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study
title_short Effects of Two-Phase Treatment with Functional Appliances Followed by Extraction versus One-Phase Treatment with Extraction in Class II Growing Patients: A Case–Control Study
title_sort effects of two-phase treatment with functional appliances followed by extraction versus one-phase treatment with extraction in class ii growing patients: a case–control study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9785998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247428
work_keys_str_mv AT wongkafai effectsoftwophasetreatmentwithfunctionalappliancesfollowedbyextractionversusonephasetreatmentwithextractioninclassiigrowingpatientsacasecontrolstudy
AT chenwener effectsoftwophasetreatmentwithfunctionalappliancesfollowedbyextractionversusonephasetreatmentwithextractioninclassiigrowingpatientsacasecontrolstudy
AT renjianhan effectsoftwophasetreatmentwithfunctionalappliancesfollowedbyextractionversusonephasetreatmentwithextractioninclassiigrowingpatientsacasecontrolstudy
AT yangyanqi effectsoftwophasetreatmentwithfunctionalappliancesfollowedbyextractionversusonephasetreatmentwithextractioninclassiigrowingpatientsacasecontrolstudy
AT linyifan effectsoftwophasetreatmentwithfunctionalappliancesfollowedbyextractionversusonephasetreatmentwithextractioninclassiigrowingpatientsacasecontrolstudy