Cargando…
Factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia: a scoping review
INTRODUCTION: A well-functioning health system delivers quality services to all people when and where they need them. To help navigate the complex realm of patient care, it is essential that health care professions have a thorough understanding of their scope of practice. However, a lack of uniformi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-022-00783-4 |
_version_ | 1784858308004282368 |
---|---|
author | Wiggins, Desmond Downie, Aron Engel, Roger M. Brown, Benjamin T. |
author_facet | Wiggins, Desmond Downie, Aron Engel, Roger M. Brown, Benjamin T. |
author_sort | Wiggins, Desmond |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A well-functioning health system delivers quality services to all people when and where they need them. To help navigate the complex realm of patient care, it is essential that health care professions have a thorough understanding of their scope of practice. However, a lack of uniformity regarding scope of practice across the regulated health professions in Australia currently exists. This has led to ambiguity about what comprises scope of practice in some health care professions in the region. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to explore the literature on the factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia. METHODS: This study employed scoping review methodology to document the current state of the literature on factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia. The search was conducted using the following databases: AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane Library, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database), MANTIS (Manual, Alternative and Natural Therapy Index System), MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS. Additional data sources were searched from Google and ProQuest. RESULTS: A total of 12 771 publications were identified from the literature search. Twenty-three documents fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Eight factors were identified across three professions (nursing & midwifery, pharmacy and physiotherapy) that influenced scope of practice: education, competency, professional identity, role confusion, legislation and regulatory policies, organisational structures, financial factors, and professional and personal factors. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will inform a range of stakeholders including the private and public arms of the healthcare system, educators, employers, funding bodies, policymakers and practitioners about the factors that influence scope of practice of health professions in Australia. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12960-022-00783-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9786531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97865312022-12-25 Factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia: a scoping review Wiggins, Desmond Downie, Aron Engel, Roger M. Brown, Benjamin T. Hum Resour Health Commentary INTRODUCTION: A well-functioning health system delivers quality services to all people when and where they need them. To help navigate the complex realm of patient care, it is essential that health care professions have a thorough understanding of their scope of practice. However, a lack of uniformity regarding scope of practice across the regulated health professions in Australia currently exists. This has led to ambiguity about what comprises scope of practice in some health care professions in the region. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to explore the literature on the factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia. METHODS: This study employed scoping review methodology to document the current state of the literature on factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia. The search was conducted using the following databases: AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane Library, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database), MANTIS (Manual, Alternative and Natural Therapy Index System), MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS. Additional data sources were searched from Google and ProQuest. RESULTS: A total of 12 771 publications were identified from the literature search. Twenty-three documents fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Eight factors were identified across three professions (nursing & midwifery, pharmacy and physiotherapy) that influenced scope of practice: education, competency, professional identity, role confusion, legislation and regulatory policies, organisational structures, financial factors, and professional and personal factors. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will inform a range of stakeholders including the private and public arms of the healthcare system, educators, employers, funding bodies, policymakers and practitioners about the factors that influence scope of practice of health professions in Australia. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12960-022-00783-4. BioMed Central 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9786531/ /pubmed/36564798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-022-00783-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Wiggins, Desmond Downie, Aron Engel, Roger M. Brown, Benjamin T. Factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia: a scoping review |
title | Factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia: a scoping review |
title_full | Factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia: a scoping review |
title_short | Factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in Australia: a scoping review |
title_sort | factors that influence scope of practice of the five largest health care professions in australia: a scoping review |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-022-00783-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wigginsdesmond factorsthatinfluencescopeofpracticeofthefivelargesthealthcareprofessionsinaustraliaascopingreview AT downiearon factorsthatinfluencescopeofpracticeofthefivelargesthealthcareprofessionsinaustraliaascopingreview AT engelrogerm factorsthatinfluencescopeofpracticeofthefivelargesthealthcareprofessionsinaustraliaascopingreview AT brownbenjamint factorsthatinfluencescopeofpracticeofthefivelargesthealthcareprofessionsinaustraliaascopingreview |