Cargando…
Crop Yield Loss Risk Is Modulated by Anthropogenic Factors
High crop yield variation between years—caused by extreme shocks on the food production system such as extreme weather—can have substantial effects on food production. This in turn introduces vulnerabilities into the global food system. To mitigate the effects of these shocks, there is a clear need...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36583138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002420 |
_version_ | 1784858335855509504 |
---|---|
author | Kinnunen, Pekka Heino, Matias Sandström, Vilma Taka, Maija Ray, Deepak K. Kummu, Matti |
author_facet | Kinnunen, Pekka Heino, Matias Sandström, Vilma Taka, Maija Ray, Deepak K. Kummu, Matti |
author_sort | Kinnunen, Pekka |
collection | PubMed |
description | High crop yield variation between years—caused by extreme shocks on the food production system such as extreme weather—can have substantial effects on food production. This in turn introduces vulnerabilities into the global food system. To mitigate the effects of these shocks, there is a clear need to understand how different adaptive capacity measures link to crop yield variability. While existing literature provides many local‐scale studies on this linkage, no comprehensive global assessment yet exists. We assessed reported crop yield variation for wheat, maize, soybean, and rice for the time period 1981–2009 by measuring both yield loss risk (variation in negative yield anomalies considering all years) and changes in yields during “dry” shock and “hot” shock years. We used the machine learning algorithm XGBoost to assess the explanatory power of selected gridded indicators of anthropogenic factors globally (i.e., adaptive capacity measures such as the human development index, irrigation infrastructure, and fertilizer use) on yield variation at a 0.5° resolution within climatically similar regions (to rule out the role of average climate conditions). We found that the anthropogenic factors explained 40%–60% of yield loss risk variation across the whole time period, whereas the factors provided noticeably lower (5%–20%) explanatory power during shock years. On a continental scale, especially in Europe and Africa, the factors explained a high proportion of the yield loss risk variation (up to around 80%). Assessing crop production vulnerabilities on global scale provides supporting knowledge to target specific adaptation measures, thus contributing to global food security. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9786645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97866452022-12-27 Crop Yield Loss Risk Is Modulated by Anthropogenic Factors Kinnunen, Pekka Heino, Matias Sandström, Vilma Taka, Maija Ray, Deepak K. Kummu, Matti Earths Future Research Article High crop yield variation between years—caused by extreme shocks on the food production system such as extreme weather—can have substantial effects on food production. This in turn introduces vulnerabilities into the global food system. To mitigate the effects of these shocks, there is a clear need to understand how different adaptive capacity measures link to crop yield variability. While existing literature provides many local‐scale studies on this linkage, no comprehensive global assessment yet exists. We assessed reported crop yield variation for wheat, maize, soybean, and rice for the time period 1981–2009 by measuring both yield loss risk (variation in negative yield anomalies considering all years) and changes in yields during “dry” shock and “hot” shock years. We used the machine learning algorithm XGBoost to assess the explanatory power of selected gridded indicators of anthropogenic factors globally (i.e., adaptive capacity measures such as the human development index, irrigation infrastructure, and fertilizer use) on yield variation at a 0.5° resolution within climatically similar regions (to rule out the role of average climate conditions). We found that the anthropogenic factors explained 40%–60% of yield loss risk variation across the whole time period, whereas the factors provided noticeably lower (5%–20%) explanatory power during shock years. On a continental scale, especially in Europe and Africa, the factors explained a high proportion of the yield loss risk variation (up to around 80%). Assessing crop production vulnerabilities on global scale provides supporting knowledge to target specific adaptation measures, thus contributing to global food security. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-26 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9786645/ /pubmed/36583138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002420 Text en © 2022. The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kinnunen, Pekka Heino, Matias Sandström, Vilma Taka, Maija Ray, Deepak K. Kummu, Matti Crop Yield Loss Risk Is Modulated by Anthropogenic Factors |
title | Crop Yield Loss Risk Is Modulated by Anthropogenic Factors |
title_full | Crop Yield Loss Risk Is Modulated by Anthropogenic Factors |
title_fullStr | Crop Yield Loss Risk Is Modulated by Anthropogenic Factors |
title_full_unstemmed | Crop Yield Loss Risk Is Modulated by Anthropogenic Factors |
title_short | Crop Yield Loss Risk Is Modulated by Anthropogenic Factors |
title_sort | crop yield loss risk is modulated by anthropogenic factors |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36583138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kinnunenpekka cropyieldlossriskismodulatedbyanthropogenicfactors AT heinomatias cropyieldlossriskismodulatedbyanthropogenicfactors AT sandstromvilma cropyieldlossriskismodulatedbyanthropogenicfactors AT takamaija cropyieldlossriskismodulatedbyanthropogenicfactors AT raydeepakk cropyieldlossriskismodulatedbyanthropogenicfactors AT kummumatti cropyieldlossriskismodulatedbyanthropogenicfactors |