Cargando…

Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening

Docking‐based virtual screening (VS) is a common starting point in many drug discovery projects. While ligand‐based approaches may sometimes provide better results, the advantage of docking lies in its ability to provide reliable ligand binding modes and approximated binding free energies, two facto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spiegel, Jacob, Senderowitz, Hanoch
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.202200034
_version_ 1784858337352876032
author Spiegel, Jacob
Senderowitz, Hanoch
author_facet Spiegel, Jacob
Senderowitz, Hanoch
author_sort Spiegel, Jacob
collection PubMed
description Docking‐based virtual screening (VS) is a common starting point in many drug discovery projects. While ligand‐based approaches may sometimes provide better results, the advantage of docking lies in its ability to provide reliable ligand binding modes and approximated binding free energies, two factors that are important for hit selection and optimization. Most docking programs were developed to be as general as possible and consequently their performances on specific targets may be sub‐optimal. With this in mind, in this work we present a method for the development of target‐specific scoring functions using our recently reported Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA). EOA derives QSAR models in the form of multiple linear regression (MLR) equations by optimizing an enrichment‐like metric. Since EOA requires target‐specific active and inactive (or decoy) compounds, we retrieved such data for six targets from the DUD‐E database, and used them to re‐derive the weights associated with the components that make up GOLD's ChemPLP scoring function yielding target‐specific, modified functions. We then used the original ChemPLP function in small‐scale VS experiments on the six targets and subsequently rescored the resulting poses with the modified functions. In addition, we used the modified functions for compounds re‐docking. We found that in many although not all cases, either rescoring the original ChemPLP poses or repeating the entire docking process with the modified functions, yielded better results in terms of AUC and EF(1%), two metrics, common for the evaluation of VS performances. While work on additional datasets and docking tools is clearly required, we propose that the results obtained thus far hint to the potential benefits in using EOA‐based optimization for the derivation of target‐specific functions in the context of virtual screening. To this end, we discuss the downsides of the methods and how it could be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9786651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97866512022-12-27 Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening Spiegel, Jacob Senderowitz, Hanoch Mol Inform Research Articles Docking‐based virtual screening (VS) is a common starting point in many drug discovery projects. While ligand‐based approaches may sometimes provide better results, the advantage of docking lies in its ability to provide reliable ligand binding modes and approximated binding free energies, two factors that are important for hit selection and optimization. Most docking programs were developed to be as general as possible and consequently their performances on specific targets may be sub‐optimal. With this in mind, in this work we present a method for the development of target‐specific scoring functions using our recently reported Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA). EOA derives QSAR models in the form of multiple linear regression (MLR) equations by optimizing an enrichment‐like metric. Since EOA requires target‐specific active and inactive (or decoy) compounds, we retrieved such data for six targets from the DUD‐E database, and used them to re‐derive the weights associated with the components that make up GOLD's ChemPLP scoring function yielding target‐specific, modified functions. We then used the original ChemPLP function in small‐scale VS experiments on the six targets and subsequently rescored the resulting poses with the modified functions. In addition, we used the modified functions for compounds re‐docking. We found that in many although not all cases, either rescoring the original ChemPLP poses or repeating the entire docking process with the modified functions, yielded better results in terms of AUC and EF(1%), two metrics, common for the evaluation of VS performances. While work on additional datasets and docking tools is clearly required, we propose that the results obtained thus far hint to the potential benefits in using EOA‐based optimization for the derivation of target‐specific functions in the context of virtual screening. To this end, we discuss the downsides of the methods and how it could be improved. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-26 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9786651/ /pubmed/35790469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.202200034 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Molecular Informatics published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Spiegel, Jacob
Senderowitz, Hanoch
Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening
title Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening
title_full Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening
title_fullStr Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening
title_full_unstemmed Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening
title_short Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening
title_sort towards an enrichment optimization algorithm (eoa)‐based target specific docking functions for virtual screening
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.202200034
work_keys_str_mv AT spiegeljacob towardsanenrichmentoptimizationalgorithmeoabasedtargetspecificdockingfunctionsforvirtualscreening
AT senderowitzhanoch towardsanenrichmentoptimizationalgorithmeoabasedtargetspecificdockingfunctionsforvirtualscreening