Cargando…
Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening
Docking‐based virtual screening (VS) is a common starting point in many drug discovery projects. While ligand‐based approaches may sometimes provide better results, the advantage of docking lies in its ability to provide reliable ligand binding modes and approximated binding free energies, two facto...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.202200034 |
_version_ | 1784858337352876032 |
---|---|
author | Spiegel, Jacob Senderowitz, Hanoch |
author_facet | Spiegel, Jacob Senderowitz, Hanoch |
author_sort | Spiegel, Jacob |
collection | PubMed |
description | Docking‐based virtual screening (VS) is a common starting point in many drug discovery projects. While ligand‐based approaches may sometimes provide better results, the advantage of docking lies in its ability to provide reliable ligand binding modes and approximated binding free energies, two factors that are important for hit selection and optimization. Most docking programs were developed to be as general as possible and consequently their performances on specific targets may be sub‐optimal. With this in mind, in this work we present a method for the development of target‐specific scoring functions using our recently reported Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA). EOA derives QSAR models in the form of multiple linear regression (MLR) equations by optimizing an enrichment‐like metric. Since EOA requires target‐specific active and inactive (or decoy) compounds, we retrieved such data for six targets from the DUD‐E database, and used them to re‐derive the weights associated with the components that make up GOLD's ChemPLP scoring function yielding target‐specific, modified functions. We then used the original ChemPLP function in small‐scale VS experiments on the six targets and subsequently rescored the resulting poses with the modified functions. In addition, we used the modified functions for compounds re‐docking. We found that in many although not all cases, either rescoring the original ChemPLP poses or repeating the entire docking process with the modified functions, yielded better results in terms of AUC and EF(1%), two metrics, common for the evaluation of VS performances. While work on additional datasets and docking tools is clearly required, we propose that the results obtained thus far hint to the potential benefits in using EOA‐based optimization for the derivation of target‐specific functions in the context of virtual screening. To this end, we discuss the downsides of the methods and how it could be improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9786651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97866512022-12-27 Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening Spiegel, Jacob Senderowitz, Hanoch Mol Inform Research Articles Docking‐based virtual screening (VS) is a common starting point in many drug discovery projects. While ligand‐based approaches may sometimes provide better results, the advantage of docking lies in its ability to provide reliable ligand binding modes and approximated binding free energies, two factors that are important for hit selection and optimization. Most docking programs were developed to be as general as possible and consequently their performances on specific targets may be sub‐optimal. With this in mind, in this work we present a method for the development of target‐specific scoring functions using our recently reported Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA). EOA derives QSAR models in the form of multiple linear regression (MLR) equations by optimizing an enrichment‐like metric. Since EOA requires target‐specific active and inactive (or decoy) compounds, we retrieved such data for six targets from the DUD‐E database, and used them to re‐derive the weights associated with the components that make up GOLD's ChemPLP scoring function yielding target‐specific, modified functions. We then used the original ChemPLP function in small‐scale VS experiments on the six targets and subsequently rescored the resulting poses with the modified functions. In addition, we used the modified functions for compounds re‐docking. We found that in many although not all cases, either rescoring the original ChemPLP poses or repeating the entire docking process with the modified functions, yielded better results in terms of AUC and EF(1%), two metrics, common for the evaluation of VS performances. While work on additional datasets and docking tools is clearly required, we propose that the results obtained thus far hint to the potential benefits in using EOA‐based optimization for the derivation of target‐specific functions in the context of virtual screening. To this end, we discuss the downsides of the methods and how it could be improved. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-26 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9786651/ /pubmed/35790469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.202200034 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Molecular Informatics published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Spiegel, Jacob Senderowitz, Hanoch Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening |
title | Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening |
title_full | Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening |
title_fullStr | Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening |
title_short | Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)‐based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening |
title_sort | towards an enrichment optimization algorithm (eoa)‐based target specific docking functions for virtual screening |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35790469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.202200034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spiegeljacob towardsanenrichmentoptimizationalgorithmeoabasedtargetspecificdockingfunctionsforvirtualscreening AT senderowitzhanoch towardsanenrichmentoptimizationalgorithmeoabasedtargetspecificdockingfunctionsforvirtualscreening |