Cargando…

Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study

Peri-prosthetic breast infections pose a risk of severe complications after breast implant surgery. The need to remove the breast implant, control the infection and perform additional surgical procedures are the consequences. Reimplantation of an alloplastic implant is only appropriate after an infe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gruener, Jasmin S., Horch, Raymund E., Geierlehner, Alexander, Mueller-Seubert, Wibke, Cai, Aijia, Arkudas, Andreas, Ludolph, Ingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122054
_version_ 1784858346730291200
author Gruener, Jasmin S.
Horch, Raymund E.
Geierlehner, Alexander
Mueller-Seubert, Wibke
Cai, Aijia
Arkudas, Andreas
Ludolph, Ingo
author_facet Gruener, Jasmin S.
Horch, Raymund E.
Geierlehner, Alexander
Mueller-Seubert, Wibke
Cai, Aijia
Arkudas, Andreas
Ludolph, Ingo
author_sort Gruener, Jasmin S.
collection PubMed
description Peri-prosthetic breast infections pose a risk of severe complications after breast implant surgery. The need to remove the breast implant, control the infection and perform additional surgical procedures are the consequences. Reimplantation of an alloplastic implant is only appropriate after an infection-free interval. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the effectiveness of negative pressure wound treatment with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) on peri-prosthetic breast infections in combination with implant removal and antibiotic therapy. Twelve patients treated with NPWTi-d due to breast implant infection were included in the study. The bacterial burden was analyzed using wound swabs before and after NPWTi-d. Additionally, laboratory values were determined before NPWTi-d and immediately before wound closure. A total of 13 peri-prosthetic breast infections in 12 patients were treated using implant removal and NPWTi-d. In 76.9% (n = 10) of the cases, the patients had undergone alloplastic breast reconstruction following cancer-related mastectomy, whereas 23.1% (n = 3) of the patients had undergone breast augmentation for cosmetic reasons. The bacterial burden in the breast pocket decreased statistically significant after implant removal and NPWTi-d. No shift from Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria was observed. Inflammatory markers rapidly decreased following treatment. NPWTi-d had a positive impact on the healing process after peri-prosthetic breast infections, leading to a decrease in bacterial burden within the wounds and contributing to uneventful healing. Therefore, secondary reimplantation of breast prostheses might be positively influenced when compared to conventional implant removal and simple secondary closure. Further studies are required to conclusively establish the beneficial long-term effects of using NPWTi-d for the treatment of peri-prosthetic breast infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9786689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97866892022-12-24 Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study Gruener, Jasmin S. Horch, Raymund E. Geierlehner, Alexander Mueller-Seubert, Wibke Cai, Aijia Arkudas, Andreas Ludolph, Ingo J Pers Med Article Peri-prosthetic breast infections pose a risk of severe complications after breast implant surgery. The need to remove the breast implant, control the infection and perform additional surgical procedures are the consequences. Reimplantation of an alloplastic implant is only appropriate after an infection-free interval. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the effectiveness of negative pressure wound treatment with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) on peri-prosthetic breast infections in combination with implant removal and antibiotic therapy. Twelve patients treated with NPWTi-d due to breast implant infection were included in the study. The bacterial burden was analyzed using wound swabs before and after NPWTi-d. Additionally, laboratory values were determined before NPWTi-d and immediately before wound closure. A total of 13 peri-prosthetic breast infections in 12 patients were treated using implant removal and NPWTi-d. In 76.9% (n = 10) of the cases, the patients had undergone alloplastic breast reconstruction following cancer-related mastectomy, whereas 23.1% (n = 3) of the patients had undergone breast augmentation for cosmetic reasons. The bacterial burden in the breast pocket decreased statistically significant after implant removal and NPWTi-d. No shift from Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria was observed. Inflammatory markers rapidly decreased following treatment. NPWTi-d had a positive impact on the healing process after peri-prosthetic breast infections, leading to a decrease in bacterial burden within the wounds and contributing to uneventful healing. Therefore, secondary reimplantation of breast prostheses might be positively influenced when compared to conventional implant removal and simple secondary closure. Further studies are required to conclusively establish the beneficial long-term effects of using NPWTi-d for the treatment of peri-prosthetic breast infections. MDPI 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9786689/ /pubmed/36556274 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122054 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gruener, Jasmin S.
Horch, Raymund E.
Geierlehner, Alexander
Mueller-Seubert, Wibke
Cai, Aijia
Arkudas, Andreas
Ludolph, Ingo
Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study
title Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study
title_full Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study
title_short Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study
title_sort is instillational topical negative pressure wound therapy in peri-prosthetic infections of the breast effective? a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9786689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36556274
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122054
work_keys_str_mv AT gruenerjasmins isinstillationaltopicalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinperiprostheticinfectionsofthebreasteffectiveapilotstudy
AT horchraymunde isinstillationaltopicalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinperiprostheticinfectionsofthebreasteffectiveapilotstudy
AT geierlehneralexander isinstillationaltopicalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinperiprostheticinfectionsofthebreasteffectiveapilotstudy
AT muellerseubertwibke isinstillationaltopicalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinperiprostheticinfectionsofthebreasteffectiveapilotstudy
AT caiaijia isinstillationaltopicalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinperiprostheticinfectionsofthebreasteffectiveapilotstudy
AT arkudasandreas isinstillationaltopicalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinperiprostheticinfectionsofthebreasteffectiveapilotstudy
AT ludolphingo isinstillationaltopicalnegativepressurewoundtherapyinperiprostheticinfectionsofthebreasteffectiveapilotstudy