Cargando…

Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States

Estimating tree leaf biomass can be challenging in applications where predictions for multiple tree species is required. This is especially evident where there is limited or no data available for some of the species of interest. Here we use an extensive national database of observations (61 species,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dettmann, Garret T., MacFarlane, David W., Radtke, Philip J., Weiskittel, Aaron R., Affleck, David L. R., Poudel, Krishna P., Westfall, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2646
_version_ 1784858553436078080
author Dettmann, Garret T.
MacFarlane, David W.
Radtke, Philip J.
Weiskittel, Aaron R.
Affleck, David L. R.
Poudel, Krishna P.
Westfall, James
author_facet Dettmann, Garret T.
MacFarlane, David W.
Radtke, Philip J.
Weiskittel, Aaron R.
Affleck, David L. R.
Poudel, Krishna P.
Westfall, James
author_sort Dettmann, Garret T.
collection PubMed
description Estimating tree leaf biomass can be challenging in applications where predictions for multiple tree species is required. This is especially evident where there is limited or no data available for some of the species of interest. Here we use an extensive national database of observations (61 species, 3628 trees) and formulate models of varying complexity, ranging from a simple model with diameter at breast height (DBH) as the only predictor to more complex models with up to 8 predictors (DBH, leaf longevity, live crown ratio, wood specific gravity, shade tolerance, mean annual temperature, and mean annual precipitation), to estimate tree leaf biomass for any species across the continental United States. The most complex with all eight predictors was the best and explained 74%–86% of the variation in leaf mass. Consideration was given to the difficulty of measuring all of these predictor variables for model application, but many are easily obtained or already widely collected. Because most of the model variables are independent of species and key species‐level variables are available from published values, our results show that leaf biomass can be estimated for new species not included in the data used to fit the model. The latter assertion was evaluated using a novel “leave‐one‐species‐out” cross‐validation approach, which showed that our chosen model performs similarly for species used to calibrate the model, as well as those not used to develop it. The models exhibited a strong bias toward overestimation for a relatively small subset of the trees. Despite these limitations, the models presented here can provide leaf biomass estimates for multiple species over large spatial scales and can be applied to new species or species with limited leaf biomass data available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9787613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97876132022-12-28 Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States Dettmann, Garret T. MacFarlane, David W. Radtke, Philip J. Weiskittel, Aaron R. Affleck, David L. R. Poudel, Krishna P. Westfall, James Ecol Appl Articles Estimating tree leaf biomass can be challenging in applications where predictions for multiple tree species is required. This is especially evident where there is limited or no data available for some of the species of interest. Here we use an extensive national database of observations (61 species, 3628 trees) and formulate models of varying complexity, ranging from a simple model with diameter at breast height (DBH) as the only predictor to more complex models with up to 8 predictors (DBH, leaf longevity, live crown ratio, wood specific gravity, shade tolerance, mean annual temperature, and mean annual precipitation), to estimate tree leaf biomass for any species across the continental United States. The most complex with all eight predictors was the best and explained 74%–86% of the variation in leaf mass. Consideration was given to the difficulty of measuring all of these predictor variables for model application, but many are easily obtained or already widely collected. Because most of the model variables are independent of species and key species‐level variables are available from published values, our results show that leaf biomass can be estimated for new species not included in the data used to fit the model. The latter assertion was evaluated using a novel “leave‐one‐species‐out” cross‐validation approach, which showed that our chosen model performs similarly for species used to calibrate the model, as well as those not used to develop it. The models exhibited a strong bias toward overestimation for a relatively small subset of the trees. Despite these limitations, the models presented here can provide leaf biomass estimates for multiple species over large spatial scales and can be applied to new species or species with limited leaf biomass data available. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-06-16 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9787613/ /pubmed/35524985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2646 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Dettmann, Garret T.
MacFarlane, David W.
Radtke, Philip J.
Weiskittel, Aaron R.
Affleck, David L. R.
Poudel, Krishna P.
Westfall, James
Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States
title Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States
title_full Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States
title_fullStr Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States
title_full_unstemmed Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States
title_short Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States
title_sort testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental united states
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2646
work_keys_str_mv AT dettmanngarrett testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates
AT macfarlanedavidw testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates
AT radtkephilipj testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates
AT weiskittelaaronr testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates
AT affleckdavidlr testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates
AT poudelkrishnap testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates
AT westfalljames testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates