Cargando…
Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States
Estimating tree leaf biomass can be challenging in applications where predictions for multiple tree species is required. This is especially evident where there is limited or no data available for some of the species of interest. Here we use an extensive national database of observations (61 species,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2646 |
_version_ | 1784858553436078080 |
---|---|
author | Dettmann, Garret T. MacFarlane, David W. Radtke, Philip J. Weiskittel, Aaron R. Affleck, David L. R. Poudel, Krishna P. Westfall, James |
author_facet | Dettmann, Garret T. MacFarlane, David W. Radtke, Philip J. Weiskittel, Aaron R. Affleck, David L. R. Poudel, Krishna P. Westfall, James |
author_sort | Dettmann, Garret T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Estimating tree leaf biomass can be challenging in applications where predictions for multiple tree species is required. This is especially evident where there is limited or no data available for some of the species of interest. Here we use an extensive national database of observations (61 species, 3628 trees) and formulate models of varying complexity, ranging from a simple model with diameter at breast height (DBH) as the only predictor to more complex models with up to 8 predictors (DBH, leaf longevity, live crown ratio, wood specific gravity, shade tolerance, mean annual temperature, and mean annual precipitation), to estimate tree leaf biomass for any species across the continental United States. The most complex with all eight predictors was the best and explained 74%–86% of the variation in leaf mass. Consideration was given to the difficulty of measuring all of these predictor variables for model application, but many are easily obtained or already widely collected. Because most of the model variables are independent of species and key species‐level variables are available from published values, our results show that leaf biomass can be estimated for new species not included in the data used to fit the model. The latter assertion was evaluated using a novel “leave‐one‐species‐out” cross‐validation approach, which showed that our chosen model performs similarly for species used to calibrate the model, as well as those not used to develop it. The models exhibited a strong bias toward overestimation for a relatively small subset of the trees. Despite these limitations, the models presented here can provide leaf biomass estimates for multiple species over large spatial scales and can be applied to new species or species with limited leaf biomass data available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9787613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97876132022-12-28 Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States Dettmann, Garret T. MacFarlane, David W. Radtke, Philip J. Weiskittel, Aaron R. Affleck, David L. R. Poudel, Krishna P. Westfall, James Ecol Appl Articles Estimating tree leaf biomass can be challenging in applications where predictions for multiple tree species is required. This is especially evident where there is limited or no data available for some of the species of interest. Here we use an extensive national database of observations (61 species, 3628 trees) and formulate models of varying complexity, ranging from a simple model with diameter at breast height (DBH) as the only predictor to more complex models with up to 8 predictors (DBH, leaf longevity, live crown ratio, wood specific gravity, shade tolerance, mean annual temperature, and mean annual precipitation), to estimate tree leaf biomass for any species across the continental United States. The most complex with all eight predictors was the best and explained 74%–86% of the variation in leaf mass. Consideration was given to the difficulty of measuring all of these predictor variables for model application, but many are easily obtained or already widely collected. Because most of the model variables are independent of species and key species‐level variables are available from published values, our results show that leaf biomass can be estimated for new species not included in the data used to fit the model. The latter assertion was evaluated using a novel “leave‐one‐species‐out” cross‐validation approach, which showed that our chosen model performs similarly for species used to calibrate the model, as well as those not used to develop it. The models exhibited a strong bias toward overestimation for a relatively small subset of the trees. Despite these limitations, the models presented here can provide leaf biomass estimates for multiple species over large spatial scales and can be applied to new species or species with limited leaf biomass data available. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-06-16 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9787613/ /pubmed/35524985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2646 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Dettmann, Garret T. MacFarlane, David W. Radtke, Philip J. Weiskittel, Aaron R. Affleck, David L. R. Poudel, Krishna P. Westfall, James Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States |
title | Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States |
title_full | Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States |
title_fullStr | Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States |
title_short | Testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental United States |
title_sort | testing a generalized leaf mass estimation method for diverse tree species and climates of the continental united states |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.2646 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dettmanngarrett testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates AT macfarlanedavidw testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates AT radtkephilipj testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates AT weiskittelaaronr testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates AT affleckdavidlr testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates AT poudelkrishnap testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates AT westfalljames testingageneralizedleafmassestimationmethodfordiversetreespeciesandclimatesofthecontinentalunitedstates |