Cargando…
In Vitro Selection of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Probiotic Strains for the Management of Oral Pathobiont Infections Associated to Systemic Diseases
The human oral pathobionts Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus mutans, in dysbiosis-promoting conditions, lead to oral infections, which also represent a threat to human systemic health. This scenario may be worsened by antibiotic misuse, which favours multi-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36555802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416163 |
_version_ | 1784858587553595392 |
---|---|
author | Zanetta, Paola Squarzanti, Diletta Francesca di Coste, Alessia Rolla, Roberta Valletti, Paolo Aluffi Garzaro, Massimiliano Dell’Era, Valeria Amoruso, Angela Pane, Marco Azzimonti, Barbara |
author_facet | Zanetta, Paola Squarzanti, Diletta Francesca di Coste, Alessia Rolla, Roberta Valletti, Paolo Aluffi Garzaro, Massimiliano Dell’Era, Valeria Amoruso, Angela Pane, Marco Azzimonti, Barbara |
author_sort | Zanetta, Paola |
collection | PubMed |
description | The human oral pathobionts Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus mutans, in dysbiosis-promoting conditions, lead to oral infections, which also represent a threat to human systemic health. This scenario may be worsened by antibiotic misuse, which favours multi-drug resistance, making the research on pathogen containment strategies more than crucial. Therefore, we aimed to in vitro select the most promising probiotic strains against oral pathogen growth, viability, biofilm formation, and co-aggregation capacity, employing both the viable probiotics and their cell-free supernatants (CFSs). Interestingly, we also assessed probiotic efficacy against the three-pathogen co-culture, mimicking an environment similar to that in vivo. Overall, the results showed that Lactobacillus CFSs performed better than the Bifidobacterium, highlighting Limosilactobacillus reuteri LRE11, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR04, Lacticaseibacillus casei LC04, and Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF26 as the most effective strains, opening the chance to deeper investigation of their action and CFS composition. Altogether, the methodologies presented in this study can be used for probiotic efficacy screenings, in order to better focus the research on a viable probiotic, or on its postbiotics, suitable in case of infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9787750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97877502022-12-24 In Vitro Selection of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Probiotic Strains for the Management of Oral Pathobiont Infections Associated to Systemic Diseases Zanetta, Paola Squarzanti, Diletta Francesca di Coste, Alessia Rolla, Roberta Valletti, Paolo Aluffi Garzaro, Massimiliano Dell’Era, Valeria Amoruso, Angela Pane, Marco Azzimonti, Barbara Int J Mol Sci Article The human oral pathobionts Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus mutans, in dysbiosis-promoting conditions, lead to oral infections, which also represent a threat to human systemic health. This scenario may be worsened by antibiotic misuse, which favours multi-drug resistance, making the research on pathogen containment strategies more than crucial. Therefore, we aimed to in vitro select the most promising probiotic strains against oral pathogen growth, viability, biofilm formation, and co-aggregation capacity, employing both the viable probiotics and their cell-free supernatants (CFSs). Interestingly, we also assessed probiotic efficacy against the three-pathogen co-culture, mimicking an environment similar to that in vivo. Overall, the results showed that Lactobacillus CFSs performed better than the Bifidobacterium, highlighting Limosilactobacillus reuteri LRE11, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR04, Lacticaseibacillus casei LC04, and Limosilactobacillus fermentum LF26 as the most effective strains, opening the chance to deeper investigation of their action and CFS composition. Altogether, the methodologies presented in this study can be used for probiotic efficacy screenings, in order to better focus the research on a viable probiotic, or on its postbiotics, suitable in case of infections. MDPI 2022-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9787750/ /pubmed/36555802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416163 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zanetta, Paola Squarzanti, Diletta Francesca di Coste, Alessia Rolla, Roberta Valletti, Paolo Aluffi Garzaro, Massimiliano Dell’Era, Valeria Amoruso, Angela Pane, Marco Azzimonti, Barbara In Vitro Selection of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Probiotic Strains for the Management of Oral Pathobiont Infections Associated to Systemic Diseases |
title | In Vitro Selection of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Probiotic Strains for the Management of Oral Pathobiont Infections Associated to Systemic Diseases |
title_full | In Vitro Selection of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Probiotic Strains for the Management of Oral Pathobiont Infections Associated to Systemic Diseases |
title_fullStr | In Vitro Selection of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Probiotic Strains for the Management of Oral Pathobiont Infections Associated to Systemic Diseases |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Selection of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Probiotic Strains for the Management of Oral Pathobiont Infections Associated to Systemic Diseases |
title_short | In Vitro Selection of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Probiotic Strains for the Management of Oral Pathobiont Infections Associated to Systemic Diseases |
title_sort | in vitro selection of lactobacillus and bifidobacterium probiotic strains for the management of oral pathobiont infections associated to systemic diseases |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36555802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zanettapaola invitroselectionoflactobacillusandbifidobacteriumprobioticstrainsforthemanagementoforalpathobiontinfectionsassociatedtosystemicdiseases AT squarzantidilettafrancesca invitroselectionoflactobacillusandbifidobacteriumprobioticstrainsforthemanagementoforalpathobiontinfectionsassociatedtosystemicdiseases AT dicostealessia invitroselectionoflactobacillusandbifidobacteriumprobioticstrainsforthemanagementoforalpathobiontinfectionsassociatedtosystemicdiseases AT rollaroberta invitroselectionoflactobacillusandbifidobacteriumprobioticstrainsforthemanagementoforalpathobiontinfectionsassociatedtosystemicdiseases AT vallettipaoloaluffi invitroselectionoflactobacillusandbifidobacteriumprobioticstrainsforthemanagementoforalpathobiontinfectionsassociatedtosystemicdiseases AT garzaromassimiliano invitroselectionoflactobacillusandbifidobacteriumprobioticstrainsforthemanagementoforalpathobiontinfectionsassociatedtosystemicdiseases AT delleravaleria invitroselectionoflactobacillusandbifidobacteriumprobioticstrainsforthemanagementoforalpathobiontinfectionsassociatedtosystemicdiseases AT amorusoangela invitroselectionoflactobacillusandbifidobacteriumprobioticstrainsforthemanagementoforalpathobiontinfectionsassociatedtosystemicdiseases AT panemarco invitroselectionoflactobacillusandbifidobacteriumprobioticstrainsforthemanagementoforalpathobiontinfectionsassociatedtosystemicdiseases AT azzimontibarbara invitroselectionoflactobacillusandbifidobacteriumprobioticstrainsforthemanagementoforalpathobiontinfectionsassociatedtosystemicdiseases |