Cargando…

Uric acid versus metabolic syndrome as markers of fatty liver disease in young people with overweight/obesity

AIMS: To compare the association of high serum uric acid (HUA) or metabolic syndrome (MetS) with fatty liver disease (FLD) in youths with overweight/obesity (OW/OB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross‐sectional study of anthropometrics, biochemical variables, and liver ultrasound of 3104 individuals with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Bonito, Procolo, Valerio, Giuliana, Licenziati, Maria Rosaria, Di Sessa, Anna, Miraglia del Giudice, Emanuele, Morandi, Anita, Maffeis, Claudio, Baroni, Marco Giorgio, Chiesa, Claudio, Pacifico, Lucia, Manco, Melania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3559
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: To compare the association of high serum uric acid (HUA) or metabolic syndrome (MetS) with fatty liver disease (FLD) in youths with overweight/obesity (OW/OB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross‐sectional study of anthropometrics, biochemical variables, and liver ultrasound of 3104 individuals with OW/OB (age 5–17 years). Metabolic syndrome was defined by ≥ 3 criteria among (1) high waist circumference; (2) high triglycerides; (3) low high‐density lipoproteins; (4) fasting glucose ≥100 mg/dl; (5) blood pressure ≥95(th) percentile in children, and ≥130/80 mmHg in adolescents. High serum uric acid was defined as serum UA value ≥ 75(th) percentile adjusted for sex. Fatty liver disease was determined by echography. RESULTS: The sample was stratified in four categories: (1) no HUA, no MetS (reference category); (2) MetS; (3) HUA; (4) HUA and MetS (HUA + MetS). The prevalence of FLD increased across the four categories from 29.9%, 44.0%, 52.2%, to 67.1%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The ORs for the categorical variables were 1.33 (1.06–1.68) for MetS (p = 0.02), 3.19 (2.51–4.05) for HUA (p < 0.0001) and 3.72 (2.65–5.21) for HUA + MetS (p < 0.0001), versus the reference category regardless of the body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: HUA represents a useful marker of FLD in youths with OW/OB, given its greater ability to identify those at increased risk of the disease compared to MetS. The ability of both to predict incident FLD must be investigated in longitudinal study.