Cargando…

Bid outcome processing in Vickrey auctions: An ERP study

Online retailers often sell products using a socially competitive second‐price sealed‐bid auction known as a Vickrey auction (VA), an incentivized demand‐revealing mechanism used to elicit players' subjective values. The VA presents a situation of risky decision‐making, which typically implemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Newton‐Fenner, Alice, Tyson‐Carr, John, Roberts, Hannah, Henderson, Jessica, Hewitt, Danielle, Byrne, Adam, Fallon, Nicolas, Gu, Yiquan, Gorelkina, Olga, Xie, Yuxin, Pantelous, Athanasios, Giesbrecht, Timo, Stancak, Andrej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14125
_version_ 1784858608236756992
author Newton‐Fenner, Alice
Tyson‐Carr, John
Roberts, Hannah
Henderson, Jessica
Hewitt, Danielle
Byrne, Adam
Fallon, Nicolas
Gu, Yiquan
Gorelkina, Olga
Xie, Yuxin
Pantelous, Athanasios
Giesbrecht, Timo
Stancak, Andrej
author_facet Newton‐Fenner, Alice
Tyson‐Carr, John
Roberts, Hannah
Henderson, Jessica
Hewitt, Danielle
Byrne, Adam
Fallon, Nicolas
Gu, Yiquan
Gorelkina, Olga
Xie, Yuxin
Pantelous, Athanasios
Giesbrecht, Timo
Stancak, Andrej
author_sort Newton‐Fenner, Alice
collection PubMed
description Online retailers often sell products using a socially competitive second‐price sealed‐bid auction known as a Vickrey auction (VA), an incentivized demand‐revealing mechanism used to elicit players' subjective values. The VA presents a situation of risky decision‐making, which typically implements value processing and a loss aversion mechanism. Neural outcome processing of VA bids are not known; this study explores this for the first time using EEG. Twenty‐eight healthy participants bid on household items against an anonymous, computerized opponent. Bid outcome event‐related potentials were predicted to differentiate between three conditions: outbid (no‐win), large margin win (bargain), and small margin win (snatch). Individual loss aversion values were evaluated in a separate behavioral experiment offering gains or losses of variable amounts but equal chances against an assured gain. Processing outcomes of VA bids were associated with a feedback‐related negativity (FRN) potential with a spatial maximum at the vertex (251–271 ms), where bargain win trials resulted in greater FRN amplitudes than snatch win trials. Additionally, a P300 potential was sensitive to win versus no‐win outcomes and to retail price. Individual loss aversion level did not correlate with the strength of FRN or P300. Results show that outcome processing in a VA is associated with FRN that differentiates between relatively advantageous and less advantageous gains, and a P300 that distinguishes between the more and less expensive auction items. Our findings pave the way to an objective exploration of economic decision‐making and purchasing behavior involving a widely popular auction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9787834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97878342022-12-28 Bid outcome processing in Vickrey auctions: An ERP study Newton‐Fenner, Alice Tyson‐Carr, John Roberts, Hannah Henderson, Jessica Hewitt, Danielle Byrne, Adam Fallon, Nicolas Gu, Yiquan Gorelkina, Olga Xie, Yuxin Pantelous, Athanasios Giesbrecht, Timo Stancak, Andrej Psychophysiology Original Articles Online retailers often sell products using a socially competitive second‐price sealed‐bid auction known as a Vickrey auction (VA), an incentivized demand‐revealing mechanism used to elicit players' subjective values. The VA presents a situation of risky decision‐making, which typically implements value processing and a loss aversion mechanism. Neural outcome processing of VA bids are not known; this study explores this for the first time using EEG. Twenty‐eight healthy participants bid on household items against an anonymous, computerized opponent. Bid outcome event‐related potentials were predicted to differentiate between three conditions: outbid (no‐win), large margin win (bargain), and small margin win (snatch). Individual loss aversion values were evaluated in a separate behavioral experiment offering gains or losses of variable amounts but equal chances against an assured gain. Processing outcomes of VA bids were associated with a feedback‐related negativity (FRN) potential with a spatial maximum at the vertex (251–271 ms), where bargain win trials resulted in greater FRN amplitudes than snatch win trials. Additionally, a P300 potential was sensitive to win versus no‐win outcomes and to retail price. Individual loss aversion level did not correlate with the strength of FRN or P300. Results show that outcome processing in a VA is associated with FRN that differentiates between relatively advantageous and less advantageous gains, and a P300 that distinguishes between the more and less expensive auction items. Our findings pave the way to an objective exploration of economic decision‐making and purchasing behavior involving a widely popular auction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-16 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9787834/ /pubmed/35711134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14125 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Newton‐Fenner, Alice
Tyson‐Carr, John
Roberts, Hannah
Henderson, Jessica
Hewitt, Danielle
Byrne, Adam
Fallon, Nicolas
Gu, Yiquan
Gorelkina, Olga
Xie, Yuxin
Pantelous, Athanasios
Giesbrecht, Timo
Stancak, Andrej
Bid outcome processing in Vickrey auctions: An ERP study
title Bid outcome processing in Vickrey auctions: An ERP study
title_full Bid outcome processing in Vickrey auctions: An ERP study
title_fullStr Bid outcome processing in Vickrey auctions: An ERP study
title_full_unstemmed Bid outcome processing in Vickrey auctions: An ERP study
title_short Bid outcome processing in Vickrey auctions: An ERP study
title_sort bid outcome processing in vickrey auctions: an erp study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14125
work_keys_str_mv AT newtonfenneralice bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT tysoncarrjohn bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT robertshannah bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT hendersonjessica bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT hewittdanielle bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT byrneadam bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT fallonnicolas bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT guyiquan bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT gorelkinaolga bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT xieyuxin bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT pantelousathanasios bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT giesbrechttimo bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy
AT stancakandrej bidoutcomeprocessinginvickreyauctionsanerpstudy