Cargando…

Validity of a Smartphone Application in Calculating Measures of Heart Rate Variability

The purpose of the current study was to determine the concurrent validity of the Elite HRV smartphone application when calculating heart rate variability (HRV) metrics in reference to an independent software criterion. A total of 5 minutes of R–R interval and natural log of root mean square of the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Himariotis, Andreas T., Coffey, Kyle F., Noel, Sabrina E., Cornell, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36560256
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22249883
_version_ 1784858637942915072
author Himariotis, Andreas T.
Coffey, Kyle F.
Noel, Sabrina E.
Cornell, David J.
author_facet Himariotis, Andreas T.
Coffey, Kyle F.
Noel, Sabrina E.
Cornell, David J.
author_sort Himariotis, Andreas T.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the current study was to determine the concurrent validity of the Elite HRV smartphone application when calculating heart rate variability (HRV) metrics in reference to an independent software criterion. A total of 5 minutes of R–R interval and natural log of root mean square of the successive differences (lnRMSSD) resting HRV data were simultaneously collected using two Polar H10 heart rate monitors (HRMs) in both the seated and supine positions from 22 participants (14 males, 8 females). One H10 HRM was paired with a Polar V800 watch and one with the Elite HRV application. When no artifact correction was applied, significant, but small, differences in the lnRMSSD data were observed between the software in the seated position (p = 0.022), and trivial and nonstatistically significant differences were observed in the supine position (p = 0.087). However, significant differences (p > 0.05) in the lnRMSSD data were no longer identifiable in either the seated or the supine positions when applying Very Low, Low, or Automatic artifact-correction filters. Additionally, excellent agreements (ICC(3,1) = 0.938 − 0.998) and very strong to near-perfect (r = 0.889 − 0.997) relationships were observed throughout all correction levels. The Elite HRV smartphone application is a valid tool for calculating resting lnRMSSD HRV metrics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9787958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97879582022-12-24 Validity of a Smartphone Application in Calculating Measures of Heart Rate Variability Himariotis, Andreas T. Coffey, Kyle F. Noel, Sabrina E. Cornell, David J. Sensors (Basel) Article The purpose of the current study was to determine the concurrent validity of the Elite HRV smartphone application when calculating heart rate variability (HRV) metrics in reference to an independent software criterion. A total of 5 minutes of R–R interval and natural log of root mean square of the successive differences (lnRMSSD) resting HRV data were simultaneously collected using two Polar H10 heart rate monitors (HRMs) in both the seated and supine positions from 22 participants (14 males, 8 females). One H10 HRM was paired with a Polar V800 watch and one with the Elite HRV application. When no artifact correction was applied, significant, but small, differences in the lnRMSSD data were observed between the software in the seated position (p = 0.022), and trivial and nonstatistically significant differences were observed in the supine position (p = 0.087). However, significant differences (p > 0.05) in the lnRMSSD data were no longer identifiable in either the seated or the supine positions when applying Very Low, Low, or Automatic artifact-correction filters. Additionally, excellent agreements (ICC(3,1) = 0.938 − 0.998) and very strong to near-perfect (r = 0.889 − 0.997) relationships were observed throughout all correction levels. The Elite HRV smartphone application is a valid tool for calculating resting lnRMSSD HRV metrics. MDPI 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9787958/ /pubmed/36560256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22249883 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Himariotis, Andreas T.
Coffey, Kyle F.
Noel, Sabrina E.
Cornell, David J.
Validity of a Smartphone Application in Calculating Measures of Heart Rate Variability
title Validity of a Smartphone Application in Calculating Measures of Heart Rate Variability
title_full Validity of a Smartphone Application in Calculating Measures of Heart Rate Variability
title_fullStr Validity of a Smartphone Application in Calculating Measures of Heart Rate Variability
title_full_unstemmed Validity of a Smartphone Application in Calculating Measures of Heart Rate Variability
title_short Validity of a Smartphone Application in Calculating Measures of Heart Rate Variability
title_sort validity of a smartphone application in calculating measures of heart rate variability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36560256
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22249883
work_keys_str_mv AT himariotisandreast validityofasmartphoneapplicationincalculatingmeasuresofheartratevariability
AT coffeykylef validityofasmartphoneapplicationincalculatingmeasuresofheartratevariability
AT noelsabrinae validityofasmartphoneapplicationincalculatingmeasuresofheartratevariability
AT cornelldavidj validityofasmartphoneapplicationincalculatingmeasuresofheartratevariability