Cargando…

Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can benefit from traditional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities directed to improve judicious perioperative prescribing and management, but evidence is lacking. The aim of this expert opinion review is to provide an update on the current la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graziano, Elena, Peghin, Maddalena, Grossi, Paolo Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tid.13895
_version_ 1784858656635879424
author Graziano, Elena
Peghin, Maddalena
Grossi, Paolo Antonio
author_facet Graziano, Elena
Peghin, Maddalena
Grossi, Paolo Antonio
author_sort Graziano, Elena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can benefit from traditional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities directed to improve judicious perioperative prescribing and management, but evidence is lacking. The aim of this expert opinion review is to provide an update on the current landscape of application of AMS practices for optimization of perioperative prophylaxis (PP). METHODS: We reviewed the available literature on early postoperative infectious complications in SOT and PP management, on modified perioperative approaches in case of infection or colonization in recipients and donors and on AMS in transplantation PP. RESULTS: SOT recipients are at high risk for early postoperative infectious complications due to the complexity of surgical procedures, severity of end stage organ disease, net state of immunosuppression in the posttransplant period and to the high risk for multidrug resistant organism. Moreover, SOT may be exposed to preservation fluid infections and expected or unexpected donor‐derived infections. We summarize main factors to take into account when prescribing transplant PP. CONCLUSION: Creating personalized PP to avoid unwanted consequences of antimicrobials while improving outcomes is an emerging and critical aspect in SOT setting. Further studies are needed to offer best PP tailored to SOT type and to evaluate interventions efficacy and safety. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9788034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97880342022-12-28 Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting Graziano, Elena Peghin, Maddalena Grossi, Paolo Antonio Transpl Infect Dis Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions and Metrics BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can benefit from traditional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities directed to improve judicious perioperative prescribing and management, but evidence is lacking. The aim of this expert opinion review is to provide an update on the current landscape of application of AMS practices for optimization of perioperative prophylaxis (PP). METHODS: We reviewed the available literature on early postoperative infectious complications in SOT and PP management, on modified perioperative approaches in case of infection or colonization in recipients and donors and on AMS in transplantation PP. RESULTS: SOT recipients are at high risk for early postoperative infectious complications due to the complexity of surgical procedures, severity of end stage organ disease, net state of immunosuppression in the posttransplant period and to the high risk for multidrug resistant organism. Moreover, SOT may be exposed to preservation fluid infections and expected or unexpected donor‐derived infections. We summarize main factors to take into account when prescribing transplant PP. CONCLUSION: Creating personalized PP to avoid unwanted consequences of antimicrobials while improving outcomes is an emerging and critical aspect in SOT setting. Further studies are needed to offer best PP tailored to SOT type and to evaluate interventions efficacy and safety. [Image: see text] John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-18 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9788034/ /pubmed/35781915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tid.13895 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Transplant Infectious Disease published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions and Metrics
Graziano, Elena
Peghin, Maddalena
Grossi, Paolo Antonio
Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting
title Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting
title_full Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting
title_fullStr Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting
title_short Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting
title_sort perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting
topic Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions and Metrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tid.13895
work_keys_str_mv AT grazianoelena perioperativeantibioticstewardshipintheorgantransplantsetting
AT peghinmaddalena perioperativeantibioticstewardshipintheorgantransplantsetting
AT grossipaoloantonio perioperativeantibioticstewardshipintheorgantransplantsetting