Cargando…
Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting
BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can benefit from traditional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities directed to improve judicious perioperative prescribing and management, but evidence is lacking. The aim of this expert opinion review is to provide an update on the current la...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tid.13895 |
_version_ | 1784858656635879424 |
---|---|
author | Graziano, Elena Peghin, Maddalena Grossi, Paolo Antonio |
author_facet | Graziano, Elena Peghin, Maddalena Grossi, Paolo Antonio |
author_sort | Graziano, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can benefit from traditional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities directed to improve judicious perioperative prescribing and management, but evidence is lacking. The aim of this expert opinion review is to provide an update on the current landscape of application of AMS practices for optimization of perioperative prophylaxis (PP). METHODS: We reviewed the available literature on early postoperative infectious complications in SOT and PP management, on modified perioperative approaches in case of infection or colonization in recipients and donors and on AMS in transplantation PP. RESULTS: SOT recipients are at high risk for early postoperative infectious complications due to the complexity of surgical procedures, severity of end stage organ disease, net state of immunosuppression in the posttransplant period and to the high risk for multidrug resistant organism. Moreover, SOT may be exposed to preservation fluid infections and expected or unexpected donor‐derived infections. We summarize main factors to take into account when prescribing transplant PP. CONCLUSION: Creating personalized PP to avoid unwanted consequences of antimicrobials while improving outcomes is an emerging and critical aspect in SOT setting. Further studies are needed to offer best PP tailored to SOT type and to evaluate interventions efficacy and safety. [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9788034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97880342022-12-28 Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting Graziano, Elena Peghin, Maddalena Grossi, Paolo Antonio Transpl Infect Dis Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions and Metrics BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can benefit from traditional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) activities directed to improve judicious perioperative prescribing and management, but evidence is lacking. The aim of this expert opinion review is to provide an update on the current landscape of application of AMS practices for optimization of perioperative prophylaxis (PP). METHODS: We reviewed the available literature on early postoperative infectious complications in SOT and PP management, on modified perioperative approaches in case of infection or colonization in recipients and donors and on AMS in transplantation PP. RESULTS: SOT recipients are at high risk for early postoperative infectious complications due to the complexity of surgical procedures, severity of end stage organ disease, net state of immunosuppression in the posttransplant period and to the high risk for multidrug resistant organism. Moreover, SOT may be exposed to preservation fluid infections and expected or unexpected donor‐derived infections. We summarize main factors to take into account when prescribing transplant PP. CONCLUSION: Creating personalized PP to avoid unwanted consequences of antimicrobials while improving outcomes is an emerging and critical aspect in SOT setting. Further studies are needed to offer best PP tailored to SOT type and to evaluate interventions efficacy and safety. [Image: see text] John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-18 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9788034/ /pubmed/35781915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tid.13895 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Transplant Infectious Disease published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions and Metrics Graziano, Elena Peghin, Maddalena Grossi, Paolo Antonio Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting |
title | Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting |
title_full | Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting |
title_fullStr | Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting |
title_short | Perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting |
title_sort | perioperative antibiotic stewardship in the organ transplant setting |
topic | Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions and Metrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tid.13895 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grazianoelena perioperativeantibioticstewardshipintheorgantransplantsetting AT peghinmaddalena perioperativeantibioticstewardshipintheorgantransplantsetting AT grossipaoloantonio perioperativeantibioticstewardshipintheorgantransplantsetting |