Cargando…
c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – A c4c expert group white paper
Children frequently respond differently to therapies compared to adults. Differences also exist between paediatric age groups for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in both efficacy and safety. Paediatric pharmacovigilance requires an understanding of the unique aspects of children with regard to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34699077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15119 |
_version_ | 1784858670672117760 |
---|---|
author | Aurich, Beate Apele‐Freimane, Dina Banaschewski, Tobias Chouchana, Laurent Day, Simon Kaguelidou, Florentia Kelly, Lauren E. Kindblom, Jenny M. Neubert, Antje Wong, Ian C. K. |
author_facet | Aurich, Beate Apele‐Freimane, Dina Banaschewski, Tobias Chouchana, Laurent Day, Simon Kaguelidou, Florentia Kelly, Lauren E. Kindblom, Jenny M. Neubert, Antje Wong, Ian C. K. |
author_sort | Aurich, Beate |
collection | PubMed |
description | Children frequently respond differently to therapies compared to adults. Differences also exist between paediatric age groups for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in both efficacy and safety. Paediatric pharmacovigilance requires an understanding of the unique aspects of children with regard to, for example, drug response, growth and development, clinical presentation of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), how they can be detected and population‐specific factors (e.g., more frequent use of off‐label/unlicensed drugs). In recognition of these challenges, a group of experts has been formed in the context of the conect4children (c4c) project to support paediatric drug development. This expert group collaborated to develop methodological considerations for paediatric drug safety and pharmacovigilance throughout the life‐cycle of medicinal products which are described in this article. These considerations include practical points to consider for the development of the paediatric section of the risk management plan (RMP), safety in paediatric protocol development, safety data collection and analysis. Furthermore, they describe the specific details of post‐marketing pharmacovigilance in children using, for example, spontaneous reports, electronic health care records, registries and record‐linkage, as well as the use of paediatric pharmacoepidemiology studies for risk characterisation. Next the details of the assessment of benefit–risk and challenges related to medicinal product formulation in the context of a Paediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) are presented. Finally, practical issues in paediatric signal detection and evaluation are included. This paper provides practical points to consider for paediatric pharmacovigilance throughout the life‐cycle of medicinal products for RMPs, protocol development, safety data collection and analysis and PIPs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9788092 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97880922022-12-28 c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – A c4c expert group white paper Aurich, Beate Apele‐Freimane, Dina Banaschewski, Tobias Chouchana, Laurent Day, Simon Kaguelidou, Florentia Kelly, Lauren E. Kindblom, Jenny M. Neubert, Antje Wong, Ian C. K. Br J Clin Pharmacol Article Children frequently respond differently to therapies compared to adults. Differences also exist between paediatric age groups for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in both efficacy and safety. Paediatric pharmacovigilance requires an understanding of the unique aspects of children with regard to, for example, drug response, growth and development, clinical presentation of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), how they can be detected and population‐specific factors (e.g., more frequent use of off‐label/unlicensed drugs). In recognition of these challenges, a group of experts has been formed in the context of the conect4children (c4c) project to support paediatric drug development. This expert group collaborated to develop methodological considerations for paediatric drug safety and pharmacovigilance throughout the life‐cycle of medicinal products which are described in this article. These considerations include practical points to consider for the development of the paediatric section of the risk management plan (RMP), safety in paediatric protocol development, safety data collection and analysis. Furthermore, they describe the specific details of post‐marketing pharmacovigilance in children using, for example, spontaneous reports, electronic health care records, registries and record‐linkage, as well as the use of paediatric pharmacoepidemiology studies for risk characterisation. Next the details of the assessment of benefit–risk and challenges related to medicinal product formulation in the context of a Paediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) are presented. Finally, practical issues in paediatric signal detection and evaluation are included. This paper provides practical points to consider for paediatric pharmacovigilance throughout the life‐cycle of medicinal products for RMPs, protocol development, safety data collection and analysis and PIPs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-18 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9788092/ /pubmed/34699077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15119 Text en © 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Article Aurich, Beate Apele‐Freimane, Dina Banaschewski, Tobias Chouchana, Laurent Day, Simon Kaguelidou, Florentia Kelly, Lauren E. Kindblom, Jenny M. Neubert, Antje Wong, Ian C. K. c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – A c4c expert group white paper |
title | c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – A c4c expert group white paper |
title_full | c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – A c4c expert group white paper |
title_fullStr | c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – A c4c expert group white paper |
title_full_unstemmed | c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – A c4c expert group white paper |
title_short | c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – A c4c expert group white paper |
title_sort | c4c: paediatric pharmacovigilance: methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – a c4c expert group white paper |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34699077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aurichbeate c4cpaediatricpharmacovigilancemethodologicalconsiderationsinresearchanddevelopmentofmedicinesforchildrenac4cexpertgroupwhitepaper AT apelefreimanedina c4cpaediatricpharmacovigilancemethodologicalconsiderationsinresearchanddevelopmentofmedicinesforchildrenac4cexpertgroupwhitepaper AT banaschewskitobias c4cpaediatricpharmacovigilancemethodologicalconsiderationsinresearchanddevelopmentofmedicinesforchildrenac4cexpertgroupwhitepaper AT chouchanalaurent c4cpaediatricpharmacovigilancemethodologicalconsiderationsinresearchanddevelopmentofmedicinesforchildrenac4cexpertgroupwhitepaper AT daysimon c4cpaediatricpharmacovigilancemethodologicalconsiderationsinresearchanddevelopmentofmedicinesforchildrenac4cexpertgroupwhitepaper AT kaguelidouflorentia c4cpaediatricpharmacovigilancemethodologicalconsiderationsinresearchanddevelopmentofmedicinesforchildrenac4cexpertgroupwhitepaper AT kellylaurene c4cpaediatricpharmacovigilancemethodologicalconsiderationsinresearchanddevelopmentofmedicinesforchildrenac4cexpertgroupwhitepaper AT kindblomjennym c4cpaediatricpharmacovigilancemethodologicalconsiderationsinresearchanddevelopmentofmedicinesforchildrenac4cexpertgroupwhitepaper AT neubertantje c4cpaediatricpharmacovigilancemethodologicalconsiderationsinresearchanddevelopmentofmedicinesforchildrenac4cexpertgroupwhitepaper AT wongianck c4cpaediatricpharmacovigilancemethodologicalconsiderationsinresearchanddevelopmentofmedicinesforchildrenac4cexpertgroupwhitepaper |