Cargando…
Techno-Economic Comparison of Integration Options for an Oxygen Transport Membrane Unit into a Coal Oxy-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Power Plant
The inclusion of membrane-based oxygen-fired combustion in power plants is considered an emerging technology that could reduce carbon emissions in a more efficient way than cryogenic oxygen-fired processes. In this paper, a techno-economic assessment was developed for a 863 MW(el,net) power plant to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36557130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12121224 |
_version_ | 1784858700750520320 |
---|---|
author | Portillo, E. Gallego Fernández, Luz M. Cano, M. Alonso-Fariñas, B. Navarrete, B. |
author_facet | Portillo, E. Gallego Fernández, Luz M. Cano, M. Alonso-Fariñas, B. Navarrete, B. |
author_sort | Portillo, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The inclusion of membrane-based oxygen-fired combustion in power plants is considered an emerging technology that could reduce carbon emissions in a more efficient way than cryogenic oxygen-fired processes. In this paper, a techno-economic assessment was developed for a 863 MW(el,net) power plant to demonstrate whether this CCS technique results in a reduction in efficiency losses and economic demand. Four configurations based on oxygen transport membranes were considered, while the benchmark cases were the air combustion process without CO(2) capture and a cryogenic oxygen-fired process. The type of driving force through the membrane (3-end or 4-end), the point of integration into the oxy-fuel combustion process, the heating system, and the pollutant control system were aspects considered in this work. In comparison, the efficiency losses for membrane-based alternatives were lower than those in the cryogenic oxygen-fired process, reaching savings of up to 14% net efficiency. Regarding the specific energy consumption for CO(2) capture, the configuration based on the oxygen transport membrane unit with 4-end mode and hot filtration presented 1.01 kW(el,net,)·h/kg(CO2 captured) with 100% CO(2) recovery, which is an improvement of 11% compared with the cases using cryogenic oxygen. Comparing economic aspects, the specific investment costs for cases based on the oxygen transport membrane unit varied between 2520 and 2942 $/kW(el,net)·h. This was between 39.6 and 48.2% above the investment for the reference case without carbon capture. However, its hypothetical implantation could suppose a savings of 10.7% in terms of investment cost compared with cryogenic oxygen-based case. In terms of the levelized cost of electricity and the cost of CO(2) avoidance, the oxygen transport membrane configurations achieved more favorable results compared with the cryogenic route, reaching savings up to 14 and 38%, respectively. Although oxygen transport membrane units are currently not mature for commercial-scale applications, the results indicated that its application within carbon capture and storage technologies can be strongly competitive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9788216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97882162022-12-24 Techno-Economic Comparison of Integration Options for an Oxygen Transport Membrane Unit into a Coal Oxy-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Power Plant Portillo, E. Gallego Fernández, Luz M. Cano, M. Alonso-Fariñas, B. Navarrete, B. Membranes (Basel) Article The inclusion of membrane-based oxygen-fired combustion in power plants is considered an emerging technology that could reduce carbon emissions in a more efficient way than cryogenic oxygen-fired processes. In this paper, a techno-economic assessment was developed for a 863 MW(el,net) power plant to demonstrate whether this CCS technique results in a reduction in efficiency losses and economic demand. Four configurations based on oxygen transport membranes were considered, while the benchmark cases were the air combustion process without CO(2) capture and a cryogenic oxygen-fired process. The type of driving force through the membrane (3-end or 4-end), the point of integration into the oxy-fuel combustion process, the heating system, and the pollutant control system were aspects considered in this work. In comparison, the efficiency losses for membrane-based alternatives were lower than those in the cryogenic oxygen-fired process, reaching savings of up to 14% net efficiency. Regarding the specific energy consumption for CO(2) capture, the configuration based on the oxygen transport membrane unit with 4-end mode and hot filtration presented 1.01 kW(el,net,)·h/kg(CO2 captured) with 100% CO(2) recovery, which is an improvement of 11% compared with the cases using cryogenic oxygen. Comparing economic aspects, the specific investment costs for cases based on the oxygen transport membrane unit varied between 2520 and 2942 $/kW(el,net)·h. This was between 39.6 and 48.2% above the investment for the reference case without carbon capture. However, its hypothetical implantation could suppose a savings of 10.7% in terms of investment cost compared with cryogenic oxygen-based case. In terms of the levelized cost of electricity and the cost of CO(2) avoidance, the oxygen transport membrane configurations achieved more favorable results compared with the cryogenic route, reaching savings up to 14 and 38%, respectively. Although oxygen transport membrane units are currently not mature for commercial-scale applications, the results indicated that its application within carbon capture and storage technologies can be strongly competitive. MDPI 2022-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9788216/ /pubmed/36557130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12121224 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Portillo, E. Gallego Fernández, Luz M. Cano, M. Alonso-Fariñas, B. Navarrete, B. Techno-Economic Comparison of Integration Options for an Oxygen Transport Membrane Unit into a Coal Oxy-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Power Plant |
title | Techno-Economic Comparison of Integration Options for an Oxygen Transport Membrane Unit into a Coal Oxy-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Power Plant |
title_full | Techno-Economic Comparison of Integration Options for an Oxygen Transport Membrane Unit into a Coal Oxy-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Power Plant |
title_fullStr | Techno-Economic Comparison of Integration Options for an Oxygen Transport Membrane Unit into a Coal Oxy-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Power Plant |
title_full_unstemmed | Techno-Economic Comparison of Integration Options for an Oxygen Transport Membrane Unit into a Coal Oxy-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Power Plant |
title_short | Techno-Economic Comparison of Integration Options for an Oxygen Transport Membrane Unit into a Coal Oxy-Fired Circulating Fluidized Bed Power Plant |
title_sort | techno-economic comparison of integration options for an oxygen transport membrane unit into a coal oxy-fired circulating fluidized bed power plant |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36557130 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12121224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT portilloe technoeconomiccomparisonofintegrationoptionsforanoxygentransportmembraneunitintoacoaloxyfiredcirculatingfluidizedbedpowerplant AT gallegofernandezluzm technoeconomiccomparisonofintegrationoptionsforanoxygentransportmembraneunitintoacoaloxyfiredcirculatingfluidizedbedpowerplant AT canom technoeconomiccomparisonofintegrationoptionsforanoxygentransportmembraneunitintoacoaloxyfiredcirculatingfluidizedbedpowerplant AT alonsofarinasb technoeconomiccomparisonofintegrationoptionsforanoxygentransportmembraneunitintoacoaloxyfiredcirculatingfluidizedbedpowerplant AT navarreteb technoeconomiccomparisonofintegrationoptionsforanoxygentransportmembraneunitintoacoaloxyfiredcirculatingfluidizedbedpowerplant |