Cargando…

Breaking the constraint on the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals: On homeotic transformations in lorises and pottos

Mammals almost always have seven cervical vertebrae. The strong evolutionary constraint on changes in this number has been broken in sloths and manatees. We have proposed that the extremely low activity and metabolic rates of these species relax the stabilizing selection against changes in the cervi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galis, Frietson, Van Dooren, Tom J. M., van der Geer, Alexandra A. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ede.12424
_version_ 1784858711573921792
author Galis, Frietson
Van Dooren, Tom J. M.
van der Geer, Alexandra A. E.
author_facet Galis, Frietson
Van Dooren, Tom J. M.
van der Geer, Alexandra A. E.
author_sort Galis, Frietson
collection PubMed
description Mammals almost always have seven cervical vertebrae. The strong evolutionary constraint on changes in this number has been broken in sloths and manatees. We have proposed that the extremely low activity and metabolic rates of these species relax the stabilizing selection against changes in the cervical count. Our hypothesis is that strong stabilizing selection in other mammals is largely indirect and due to associated pleiotropic effects, including juvenile cancers. Additional direct selection can occur due to biomechanical problems (thoracic outlet syndrome). Low metabolic and activity rates are thought to diminish these direct and indirect effects. To test this hypothesis within the primates, we have compared the number of cervical vertebrae of three lorisid species with particularly low activity and metabolic rates with those of more active primate species, including with their phylogenetically closest active relatives, the galagids (bushbabies). In support of our hypothesis, we found that 37.6% of the lorisid specimens had an abnormal cervical count, which is a higher percentage than in the other nine primate families, in which the incidence varied from zero to 2.2%. We conclude that our data support the importance of internal selection in constraining evolvability and of a relaxed stabilizing selection for increasing evolvability. Additionally, we discuss that there is no support for a role of the muscularized diaphragm in the evolutionary constraint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9788262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97882622022-12-28 Breaking the constraint on the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals: On homeotic transformations in lorises and pottos Galis, Frietson Van Dooren, Tom J. M. van der Geer, Alexandra A. E. Evol Dev Research Articles Mammals almost always have seven cervical vertebrae. The strong evolutionary constraint on changes in this number has been broken in sloths and manatees. We have proposed that the extremely low activity and metabolic rates of these species relax the stabilizing selection against changes in the cervical count. Our hypothesis is that strong stabilizing selection in other mammals is largely indirect and due to associated pleiotropic effects, including juvenile cancers. Additional direct selection can occur due to biomechanical problems (thoracic outlet syndrome). Low metabolic and activity rates are thought to diminish these direct and indirect effects. To test this hypothesis within the primates, we have compared the number of cervical vertebrae of three lorisid species with particularly low activity and metabolic rates with those of more active primate species, including with their phylogenetically closest active relatives, the galagids (bushbabies). In support of our hypothesis, we found that 37.6% of the lorisid specimens had an abnormal cervical count, which is a higher percentage than in the other nine primate families, in which the incidence varied from zero to 2.2%. We conclude that our data support the importance of internal selection in constraining evolvability and of a relaxed stabilizing selection for increasing evolvability. Additionally, we discuss that there is no support for a role of the muscularized diaphragm in the evolutionary constraint. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-31 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9788262/ /pubmed/36316803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ede.12424 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Evolution & Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Galis, Frietson
Van Dooren, Tom J. M.
van der Geer, Alexandra A. E.
Breaking the constraint on the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals: On homeotic transformations in lorises and pottos
title Breaking the constraint on the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals: On homeotic transformations in lorises and pottos
title_full Breaking the constraint on the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals: On homeotic transformations in lorises and pottos
title_fullStr Breaking the constraint on the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals: On homeotic transformations in lorises and pottos
title_full_unstemmed Breaking the constraint on the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals: On homeotic transformations in lorises and pottos
title_short Breaking the constraint on the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals: On homeotic transformations in lorises and pottos
title_sort breaking the constraint on the number of cervical vertebrae in mammals: on homeotic transformations in lorises and pottos
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ede.12424
work_keys_str_mv AT galisfrietson breakingtheconstraintonthenumberofcervicalvertebraeinmammalsonhomeotictransformationsinlorisesandpottos
AT vandoorentomjm breakingtheconstraintonthenumberofcervicalvertebraeinmammalsonhomeotictransformationsinlorisesandpottos
AT vandergeeralexandraae breakingtheconstraintonthenumberofcervicalvertebraeinmammalsonhomeotictransformationsinlorisesandpottos