Cargando…
The prognostic value of the 12‐, 6‐, 3‐ and 1‐month ‘Surprise Question’ in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals
OBJECTIVE: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the performance of the ‘Surprise Question’ (SQ) ‘Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?’ in predicting survival of 12, 6, 3 and 1 month(s), respectively, in hospitalised patients with cancer. METHODS: In three hospitals, p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13551 |
_version_ | 1784858724125376512 |
---|---|
author | Stoppelenburg, Arianne Arslan, Müzeyyen Owusuaa, Catherine Gunnink, Nicolette van der Linden, Yvette M. Luelmo, Saskia A. C. Meerum‐Terwogt, Jetske van der Padt‐Pruijsten, Annemieke Nieboer, Daan van der Heide, Agnes |
author_facet | Stoppelenburg, Arianne Arslan, Müzeyyen Owusuaa, Catherine Gunnink, Nicolette van der Linden, Yvette M. Luelmo, Saskia A. C. Meerum‐Terwogt, Jetske van der Padt‐Pruijsten, Annemieke Nieboer, Daan van der Heide, Agnes |
author_sort | Stoppelenburg, Arianne |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the performance of the ‘Surprise Question’ (SQ) ‘Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?’ in predicting survival of 12, 6, 3 and 1 month(s), respectively, in hospitalised patients with cancer. METHODS: In three hospitals, physicians were asked to answer SQs for 12/6/3/1 month(s) for inpatients with cancer. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 783 patients were included, of whom 51% died in the 12‐month period after inclusion. Sensitivity of the SQ predicting death within 12 months was 0.79, specificity was 0.66, the positive predictive value was 0.71 and the negative predictive value was 0.75. When the SQ concerned a shorter survival period, sensitivities and positive predictive values decreased, whereas specificities and negative predictive values increased. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the SQ was significantly associated with mortality (OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.70–5.71, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The 12‐month SQ predicts death in patients with cancer admitted to the hospital reasonably well. Shortening the timeframe decreases sensitivities and increases specificities. The four surprise questions may help to identify patients for whom palliative care is indicated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9788313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97883132022-12-28 The prognostic value of the 12‐, 6‐, 3‐ and 1‐month ‘Surprise Question’ in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals Stoppelenburg, Arianne Arslan, Müzeyyen Owusuaa, Catherine Gunnink, Nicolette van der Linden, Yvette M. Luelmo, Saskia A. C. Meerum‐Terwogt, Jetske van der Padt‐Pruijsten, Annemieke Nieboer, Daan van der Heide, Agnes Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Special Issue Articles OBJECTIVE: This prospective study aimed to evaluate the performance of the ‘Surprise Question’ (SQ) ‘Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?’ in predicting survival of 12, 6, 3 and 1 month(s), respectively, in hospitalised patients with cancer. METHODS: In three hospitals, physicians were asked to answer SQs for 12/6/3/1 month(s) for inpatients with cancer. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 783 patients were included, of whom 51% died in the 12‐month period after inclusion. Sensitivity of the SQ predicting death within 12 months was 0.79, specificity was 0.66, the positive predictive value was 0.71 and the negative predictive value was 0.75. When the SQ concerned a shorter survival period, sensitivities and positive predictive values decreased, whereas specificities and negative predictive values increased. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the SQ was significantly associated with mortality (OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.70–5.71, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The 12‐month SQ predicts death in patients with cancer admitted to the hospital reasonably well. Shortening the timeframe decreases sensitivities and increases specificities. The four surprise questions may help to identify patients for whom palliative care is indicated. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-26 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9788313/ /pubmed/35083780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13551 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Special Issue Articles Stoppelenburg, Arianne Arslan, Müzeyyen Owusuaa, Catherine Gunnink, Nicolette van der Linden, Yvette M. Luelmo, Saskia A. C. Meerum‐Terwogt, Jetske van der Padt‐Pruijsten, Annemieke Nieboer, Daan van der Heide, Agnes The prognostic value of the 12‐, 6‐, 3‐ and 1‐month ‘Surprise Question’ in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals |
title | The prognostic value of the 12‐, 6‐, 3‐ and 1‐month ‘Surprise Question’ in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals |
title_full | The prognostic value of the 12‐, 6‐, 3‐ and 1‐month ‘Surprise Question’ in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals |
title_fullStr | The prognostic value of the 12‐, 6‐, 3‐ and 1‐month ‘Surprise Question’ in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic value of the 12‐, 6‐, 3‐ and 1‐month ‘Surprise Question’ in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals |
title_short | The prognostic value of the 12‐, 6‐, 3‐ and 1‐month ‘Surprise Question’ in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals |
title_sort | prognostic value of the 12‐, 6‐, 3‐ and 1‐month ‘surprise question’ in cancer patients: a prospective cohort study in three hospitals |
topic | Special Issue Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoppelenburgarianne theprognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT arslanmuzeyyen theprognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT owusuaacatherine theprognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT gunninknicolette theprognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT vanderlindenyvettem theprognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT luelmosaskiaac theprognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT meerumterwogtjetske theprognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT vanderpadtpruijstenannemieke theprognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT nieboerdaan theprognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT vanderheideagnes theprognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT stoppelenburgarianne prognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT arslanmuzeyyen prognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT owusuaacatherine prognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT gunninknicolette prognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT vanderlindenyvettem prognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT luelmosaskiaac prognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT meerumterwogtjetske prognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT vanderpadtpruijstenannemieke prognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT nieboerdaan prognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals AT vanderheideagnes prognosticvalueofthe1263and1monthsurprisequestionincancerpatientsaprospectivecohortstudyinthreehospitals |