Cargando…

Mechanics of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattices with Varied Design and Processing Strategies

Emerging polymer 3D-printing technologies are enabling the design and fabrication of mechanically efficient lattice structures with intricate microscale structures. During fabrication, manufacturing inconsistencies can affect mechanical efficiency, thereby driving a need to investigate how design an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egan, Paul F., Khatri, Nava Raj, Parab, Manasi Anil, Arefin, Amit M. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36559882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14245515
_version_ 1784858733494403072
author Egan, Paul F.
Khatri, Nava Raj
Parab, Manasi Anil
Arefin, Amit M. E.
author_facet Egan, Paul F.
Khatri, Nava Raj
Parab, Manasi Anil
Arefin, Amit M. E.
author_sort Egan, Paul F.
collection PubMed
description Emerging polymer 3D-printing technologies are enabling the design and fabrication of mechanically efficient lattice structures with intricate microscale structures. During fabrication, manufacturing inconsistencies can affect mechanical efficiency, thereby driving a need to investigate how design and processing strategies influence outcomes. Here, mechanical testing is conducted for 3D-printed lattice structures while altering topology, relative density, and exposure time per layer using digital light processing (DLP). Experiments compared a Cube topology with 800 µm beams and Body-Centered Cube (BCC) topologies with 500 or 800 µm beams, all designed with 40% relative density. Cube lattices had the lowest mean measured relative density of ~42%, while the 500 µm BCC lattice had the highest relative density of ~55%. Elastic modulus, yield strength, and ultimate strength had a positive correlation with measured relative density when considering measurement distributions for thirty samples of each design. BCC lattices designed with 50%, 40%, and 30% relative densities were then fabricated with exposure-per-layer times of 1500 and 1750 ms. Increasing exposure time per layer resulted in higher scaling of mechanical properties to relative density compared to design alteration strategies. These results reveal how design and fabrication strategies affect mechanical performance of lattices suitable for diverse engineering applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9788352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97883522022-12-24 Mechanics of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattices with Varied Design and Processing Strategies Egan, Paul F. Khatri, Nava Raj Parab, Manasi Anil Arefin, Amit M. E. Polymers (Basel) Article Emerging polymer 3D-printing technologies are enabling the design and fabrication of mechanically efficient lattice structures with intricate microscale structures. During fabrication, manufacturing inconsistencies can affect mechanical efficiency, thereby driving a need to investigate how design and processing strategies influence outcomes. Here, mechanical testing is conducted for 3D-printed lattice structures while altering topology, relative density, and exposure time per layer using digital light processing (DLP). Experiments compared a Cube topology with 800 µm beams and Body-Centered Cube (BCC) topologies with 500 or 800 µm beams, all designed with 40% relative density. Cube lattices had the lowest mean measured relative density of ~42%, while the 500 µm BCC lattice had the highest relative density of ~55%. Elastic modulus, yield strength, and ultimate strength had a positive correlation with measured relative density when considering measurement distributions for thirty samples of each design. BCC lattices designed with 50%, 40%, and 30% relative densities were then fabricated with exposure-per-layer times of 1500 and 1750 ms. Increasing exposure time per layer resulted in higher scaling of mechanical properties to relative density compared to design alteration strategies. These results reveal how design and fabrication strategies affect mechanical performance of lattices suitable for diverse engineering applications. MDPI 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9788352/ /pubmed/36559882 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14245515 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Egan, Paul F.
Khatri, Nava Raj
Parab, Manasi Anil
Arefin, Amit M. E.
Mechanics of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattices with Varied Design and Processing Strategies
title Mechanics of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattices with Varied Design and Processing Strategies
title_full Mechanics of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattices with Varied Design and Processing Strategies
title_fullStr Mechanics of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattices with Varied Design and Processing Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Mechanics of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattices with Varied Design and Processing Strategies
title_short Mechanics of 3D-Printed Polymer Lattices with Varied Design and Processing Strategies
title_sort mechanics of 3d-printed polymer lattices with varied design and processing strategies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36559882
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14245515
work_keys_str_mv AT eganpaulf mechanicsof3dprintedpolymerlatticeswithvarieddesignandprocessingstrategies
AT khatrinavaraj mechanicsof3dprintedpolymerlatticeswithvarieddesignandprocessingstrategies
AT parabmanasianil mechanicsof3dprintedpolymerlatticeswithvarieddesignandprocessingstrategies
AT arefinamitme mechanicsof3dprintedpolymerlatticeswithvarieddesignandprocessingstrategies