Cargando…

Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary. METHODS: F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sohns, Christian, Bergau, Leonard, El-Hamriti, Mustapha, Fox, Henrik, Molatta, Stephan, Braun, Martin, Khalaph, Moneeb, Imnadze, Guram, Sommer, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346368
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0180
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and arrhythmia substrates affecting the LA posterior wall underwent posterior wall isolation by linear lesions across the roof and bottom. The cohort was divided into two groups: group 1 (20 patients) linear ablation guided by contact force (CF) only; group 2 (20 patients) guided by ablation index (AI) and interlesion distance. RESULTS: Bidirectional block across the LA roof and bottom was achieved in 40/40 patients. Additional endocardial RF applications in 5 patients from group 1 vs. 3 patients from group 2 resulted in posterior wall isolation in all patients. Procedure duration was almost equal in both groups. CF and AI were significantly higher in group 2 for the roof line, whereas no statistical difference was found for the bottom line. AI-guided LA posterior wall isolation led to a significantly lower maximum temperature increase. The mean AI value as well as the mean value for catheter-to-tissue CF for the roof line were significantly higher when AI-guided ablation was performed. Standard deviation in group 2 showed a remarkably lower dispersion. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation index guided posterior wall isolation for substrate modification is safe and effective. AI guided application of the posterior box lesion allows improved lesion formation.