Cargando…
Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary. METHODS: F...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Via Medica
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346368 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0180 |
_version_ | 1784858821805473792 |
---|---|
author | Sohns, Christian Bergau, Leonard El-Hamriti, Mustapha Fox, Henrik Molatta, Stephan Braun, Martin Khalaph, Moneeb Imnadze, Guram Sommer, Philipp |
author_facet | Sohns, Christian Bergau, Leonard El-Hamriti, Mustapha Fox, Henrik Molatta, Stephan Braun, Martin Khalaph, Moneeb Imnadze, Guram Sommer, Philipp |
author_sort | Sohns, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and arrhythmia substrates affecting the LA posterior wall underwent posterior wall isolation by linear lesions across the roof and bottom. The cohort was divided into two groups: group 1 (20 patients) linear ablation guided by contact force (CF) only; group 2 (20 patients) guided by ablation index (AI) and interlesion distance. RESULTS: Bidirectional block across the LA roof and bottom was achieved in 40/40 patients. Additional endocardial RF applications in 5 patients from group 1 vs. 3 patients from group 2 resulted in posterior wall isolation in all patients. Procedure duration was almost equal in both groups. CF and AI were significantly higher in group 2 for the roof line, whereas no statistical difference was found for the bottom line. AI-guided LA posterior wall isolation led to a significantly lower maximum temperature increase. The mean AI value as well as the mean value for catheter-to-tissue CF for the roof line were significantly higher when AI-guided ablation was performed. Standard deviation in group 2 showed a remarkably lower dispersion. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation index guided posterior wall isolation for substrate modification is safe and effective. AI guided application of the posterior box lesion allows improved lesion formation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9788747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Via Medica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97887472022-12-27 Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation Sohns, Christian Bergau, Leonard El-Hamriti, Mustapha Fox, Henrik Molatta, Stephan Braun, Martin Khalaph, Moneeb Imnadze, Guram Sommer, Philipp Cardiol J Clinical Cardiology BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and arrhythmia substrates affecting the LA posterior wall underwent posterior wall isolation by linear lesions across the roof and bottom. The cohort was divided into two groups: group 1 (20 patients) linear ablation guided by contact force (CF) only; group 2 (20 patients) guided by ablation index (AI) and interlesion distance. RESULTS: Bidirectional block across the LA roof and bottom was achieved in 40/40 patients. Additional endocardial RF applications in 5 patients from group 1 vs. 3 patients from group 2 resulted in posterior wall isolation in all patients. Procedure duration was almost equal in both groups. CF and AI were significantly higher in group 2 for the roof line, whereas no statistical difference was found for the bottom line. AI-guided LA posterior wall isolation led to a significantly lower maximum temperature increase. The mean AI value as well as the mean value for catheter-to-tissue CF for the roof line were significantly higher when AI-guided ablation was performed. Standard deviation in group 2 showed a remarkably lower dispersion. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation index guided posterior wall isolation for substrate modification is safe and effective. AI guided application of the posterior box lesion allows improved lesion formation. Via Medica 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9788747/ /pubmed/33346368 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0180 Text en Copyright © 2022 Via Medica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cardiology Sohns, Christian Bergau, Leonard El-Hamriti, Mustapha Fox, Henrik Molatta, Stephan Braun, Martin Khalaph, Moneeb Imnadze, Guram Sommer, Philipp Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation |
title | Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation |
title_full | Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation |
title_fullStr | Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation |
title_short | Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation |
title_sort | posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation |
topic | Clinical Cardiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346368 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sohnschristian posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT bergauleonard posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT elhamritimustapha posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT foxhenrik posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT molattastephan posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT braunmartin posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT khalaphmoneeb posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT imnadzeguram posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation AT sommerphilipp posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation |