Cargando…

Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary. METHODS: F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sohns, Christian, Bergau, Leonard, El-Hamriti, Mustapha, Fox, Henrik, Molatta, Stephan, Braun, Martin, Khalaph, Moneeb, Imnadze, Guram, Sommer, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346368
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0180
_version_ 1784858821805473792
author Sohns, Christian
Bergau, Leonard
El-Hamriti, Mustapha
Fox, Henrik
Molatta, Stephan
Braun, Martin
Khalaph, Moneeb
Imnadze, Guram
Sommer, Philipp
author_facet Sohns, Christian
Bergau, Leonard
El-Hamriti, Mustapha
Fox, Henrik
Molatta, Stephan
Braun, Martin
Khalaph, Moneeb
Imnadze, Guram
Sommer, Philipp
author_sort Sohns, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and arrhythmia substrates affecting the LA posterior wall underwent posterior wall isolation by linear lesions across the roof and bottom. The cohort was divided into two groups: group 1 (20 patients) linear ablation guided by contact force (CF) only; group 2 (20 patients) guided by ablation index (AI) and interlesion distance. RESULTS: Bidirectional block across the LA roof and bottom was achieved in 40/40 patients. Additional endocardial RF applications in 5 patients from group 1 vs. 3 patients from group 2 resulted in posterior wall isolation in all patients. Procedure duration was almost equal in both groups. CF and AI were significantly higher in group 2 for the roof line, whereas no statistical difference was found for the bottom line. AI-guided LA posterior wall isolation led to a significantly lower maximum temperature increase. The mean AI value as well as the mean value for catheter-to-tissue CF for the roof line were significantly higher when AI-guided ablation was performed. Standard deviation in group 2 showed a remarkably lower dispersion. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation index guided posterior wall isolation for substrate modification is safe and effective. AI guided application of the posterior box lesion allows improved lesion formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9788747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97887472022-12-27 Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation Sohns, Christian Bergau, Leonard El-Hamriti, Mustapha Fox, Henrik Molatta, Stephan Braun, Martin Khalaph, Moneeb Imnadze, Guram Sommer, Philipp Cardiol J Clinical Cardiology BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the left atrial (LA) roof and bottom to isolate the LA posterior wall using contiguous and optimized RF lesions was evaluated. Achieving isolation of the LA posterior wall is challenging as two continuous linear lesion sets are necessary. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and arrhythmia substrates affecting the LA posterior wall underwent posterior wall isolation by linear lesions across the roof and bottom. The cohort was divided into two groups: group 1 (20 patients) linear ablation guided by contact force (CF) only; group 2 (20 patients) guided by ablation index (AI) and interlesion distance. RESULTS: Bidirectional block across the LA roof and bottom was achieved in 40/40 patients. Additional endocardial RF applications in 5 patients from group 1 vs. 3 patients from group 2 resulted in posterior wall isolation in all patients. Procedure duration was almost equal in both groups. CF and AI were significantly higher in group 2 for the roof line, whereas no statistical difference was found for the bottom line. AI-guided LA posterior wall isolation led to a significantly lower maximum temperature increase. The mean AI value as well as the mean value for catheter-to-tissue CF for the roof line were significantly higher when AI-guided ablation was performed. Standard deviation in group 2 showed a remarkably lower dispersion. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation index guided posterior wall isolation for substrate modification is safe and effective. AI guided application of the posterior box lesion allows improved lesion formation. Via Medica 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9788747/ /pubmed/33346368 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0180 Text en Copyright © 2022 Via Medica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Clinical Cardiology
Sohns, Christian
Bergau, Leonard
El-Hamriti, Mustapha
Fox, Henrik
Molatta, Stephan
Braun, Martin
Khalaph, Moneeb
Imnadze, Guram
Sommer, Philipp
Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation
title Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation
title_full Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation
title_short Posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation
title_sort posterior wall substrate modification using optimized and contiguous lesions in patients with atrial fibrillation
topic Clinical Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33346368
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2020.0180
work_keys_str_mv AT sohnschristian posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT bergauleonard posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT elhamritimustapha posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT foxhenrik posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT molattastephan posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT braunmartin posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT khalaphmoneeb posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT imnadzeguram posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT sommerphilipp posteriorwallsubstratemodificationusingoptimizedandcontiguouslesionsinpatientswithatrialfibrillation