Cargando…

Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur

Introduction The proximal femoral nail (PFN) is a widely accepted fixation method for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Reconstructing the lateral trochanteric wall and ensuring the stability of the trochanteric fragments are considered to be essential for enhancing the prognos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajput, Ajay K, Gupta, Pradeep K, Gill, Simrat Pal S, Singh, Santosh Kumar, Raj, Manish, Singh, Jasveer, Dubey, Pawan, Sharma, Pranav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578861
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32791
_version_ 1784858831734439936
author Rajput, Ajay K
Gupta, Pradeep K
Gill, Simrat Pal S
Singh, Santosh Kumar
Raj, Manish
Singh, Jasveer
Dubey, Pawan
Sharma, Pranav
author_facet Rajput, Ajay K
Gupta, Pradeep K
Gill, Simrat Pal S
Singh, Santosh Kumar
Raj, Manish
Singh, Jasveer
Dubey, Pawan
Sharma, Pranav
author_sort Rajput, Ajay K
collection PubMed
description Introduction The proximal femoral nail (PFN) is a widely accepted fixation method for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Reconstructing the lateral trochanteric wall and ensuring the stability of the trochanteric fragments are considered to be essential for enhancing the prognosis of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the results of the management of unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using PFN and the screw-augmented PFN (aPFN). Methods This prospective comparative study was undertaken from January 2020 to July 2021 and included 60 patients presenting with unstable intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA type 31-A2.2 and 31-A2.3) at a tertiary care teaching institute in northern India. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into two groups (group 1 and group 2) and were managed with screw-augmented PFN and PFN, respectively. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Salvati and Wilson score at the 12-month follow-up. SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. A p-value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant. Results The average time to union of the fractures in group 1 was 12.66 ± 1.68 weeks, while it was 13.47 ± 1.47 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.055). At the 12-month follow-up, the average functional outcome, as evaluated by Salvati and Wilson score, was 34 ± 2.40 in group 1, whereas it was 31.58 ± 4.4 in group 2; and the difference was observed to be statistically significant (p = 0.011). Group 1 had 28 patients (93.33%) with excellent to good results, while group 2 had 25 patients (83.33%) with excellent to good results. One patient in group 1 and five patients in group 2 had poor outcomes at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusion Screw-augmented PFN has better functional outcomes as compared to PFN alone for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Hence, in our opinion, screw augmentation of PFN may be the better fixation technique for most unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9788788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97887882022-12-27 Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur Rajput, Ajay K Gupta, Pradeep K Gill, Simrat Pal S Singh, Santosh Kumar Raj, Manish Singh, Jasveer Dubey, Pawan Sharma, Pranav Cureus Orthopedics Introduction The proximal femoral nail (PFN) is a widely accepted fixation method for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Reconstructing the lateral trochanteric wall and ensuring the stability of the trochanteric fragments are considered to be essential for enhancing the prognosis of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the results of the management of unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using PFN and the screw-augmented PFN (aPFN). Methods This prospective comparative study was undertaken from January 2020 to July 2021 and included 60 patients presenting with unstable intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA type 31-A2.2 and 31-A2.3) at a tertiary care teaching institute in northern India. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into two groups (group 1 and group 2) and were managed with screw-augmented PFN and PFN, respectively. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Salvati and Wilson score at the 12-month follow-up. SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. A p-value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant. Results The average time to union of the fractures in group 1 was 12.66 ± 1.68 weeks, while it was 13.47 ± 1.47 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.055). At the 12-month follow-up, the average functional outcome, as evaluated by Salvati and Wilson score, was 34 ± 2.40 in group 1, whereas it was 31.58 ± 4.4 in group 2; and the difference was observed to be statistically significant (p = 0.011). Group 1 had 28 patients (93.33%) with excellent to good results, while group 2 had 25 patients (83.33%) with excellent to good results. One patient in group 1 and five patients in group 2 had poor outcomes at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusion Screw-augmented PFN has better functional outcomes as compared to PFN alone for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Hence, in our opinion, screw augmentation of PFN may be the better fixation technique for most unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. Cureus 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9788788/ /pubmed/36578861 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32791 Text en Copyright © 2022, Rajput et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Rajput, Ajay K
Gupta, Pradeep K
Gill, Simrat Pal S
Singh, Santosh Kumar
Raj, Manish
Singh, Jasveer
Dubey, Pawan
Sharma, Pranav
Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur
title Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur
title_full Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur
title_fullStr Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur
title_short Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur
title_sort prospective comparative study between proximal femoral nail vs. screw augmented proximal femoral nail in unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578861
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32791
work_keys_str_mv AT rajputajayk prospectivecomparativestudybetweenproximalfemoralnailvsscrewaugmentedproximalfemoralnailinunstableintertrochantericfracturesoffemur
AT guptapradeepk prospectivecomparativestudybetweenproximalfemoralnailvsscrewaugmentedproximalfemoralnailinunstableintertrochantericfracturesoffemur
AT gillsimratpals prospectivecomparativestudybetweenproximalfemoralnailvsscrewaugmentedproximalfemoralnailinunstableintertrochantericfracturesoffemur
AT singhsantoshkumar prospectivecomparativestudybetweenproximalfemoralnailvsscrewaugmentedproximalfemoralnailinunstableintertrochantericfracturesoffemur
AT rajmanish prospectivecomparativestudybetweenproximalfemoralnailvsscrewaugmentedproximalfemoralnailinunstableintertrochantericfracturesoffemur
AT singhjasveer prospectivecomparativestudybetweenproximalfemoralnailvsscrewaugmentedproximalfemoralnailinunstableintertrochantericfracturesoffemur
AT dubeypawan prospectivecomparativestudybetweenproximalfemoralnailvsscrewaugmentedproximalfemoralnailinunstableintertrochantericfracturesoffemur
AT sharmapranav prospectivecomparativestudybetweenproximalfemoralnailvsscrewaugmentedproximalfemoralnailinunstableintertrochantericfracturesoffemur