Cargando…

Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVES: The cytokine oncostatin M (OSM) is implicated in the pathology of SSc. Inhibiting OSM signalling using GSK2330811 (an anti-OSM monoclonal antibody) in patients with SSc has the potential to slow or stop the disease process. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denton, Christopher P, del Galdo, Francesco, Khanna, Dinesh, Vonk, Madelon C, Chung, Lorinda, Johnson, Sindhu R, Varga, John, Furst, Daniel E, Temple, Jane, Zecchin, Chiara, Csomor, Eszter, Lee, Amy, Wisniacki, Nicolas, Flint, Shaun M, Reid, Juliet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35583273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac300
_version_ 1784858838393946112
author Denton, Christopher P
del Galdo, Francesco
Khanna, Dinesh
Vonk, Madelon C
Chung, Lorinda
Johnson, Sindhu R
Varga, John
Furst, Daniel E
Temple, Jane
Zecchin, Chiara
Csomor, Eszter
Lee, Amy
Wisniacki, Nicolas
Flint, Shaun M
Reid, Juliet
author_facet Denton, Christopher P
del Galdo, Francesco
Khanna, Dinesh
Vonk, Madelon C
Chung, Lorinda
Johnson, Sindhu R
Varga, John
Furst, Daniel E
Temple, Jane
Zecchin, Chiara
Csomor, Eszter
Lee, Amy
Wisniacki, Nicolas
Flint, Shaun M
Reid, Juliet
author_sort Denton, Christopher P
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The cytokine oncostatin M (OSM) is implicated in the pathology of SSc. Inhibiting OSM signalling using GSK2330811 (an anti-OSM monoclonal antibody) in patients with SSc has the potential to slow or stop the disease process. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled participants ≥18 years of age with active dcSSc. Participants were randomized 3:1 (GSK2330811:placebo) in one of two sequential cohorts to receive GSK2330811 (cohort 1: 100 mg; cohort 2: 300 mg) or placebo s.c. every other week for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety; blood and skin biopsy samples were collected to explore mechanistic effects on inflammation and fibrosis. Clinical efficacy was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants were randomized to placebo (n = 8), GSK2330811 100 mg (n = 3) or GSK2330811 300 mg (n = 24). Proof of mechanism, measured by coordinate effects on biomarkers of inflammation or fibrosis, was not demonstrated following GSK2330811 treatment. There were no meaningful differences between GSK2330811 and placebo for any efficacy endpoints. The safety and tolerability of GSK2330811 were not favourable in the 300 mg group, with on-target, dose-dependent adverse events related to decreases in haemoglobin and platelet count that were not observed in the 100 mg or placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Despite a robust and novel experimental medicine approach and evidence of target engagement, anticipated SSc-related biologic effects of GSK2330811 were not different from placebo and safety was unfavourable, suggesting OSM inhibition may not be a useful therapeutic strategy in SSc. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03041025; EudraCT, 2016-003417-95.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9788816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97888162022-12-30 Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis Denton, Christopher P del Galdo, Francesco Khanna, Dinesh Vonk, Madelon C Chung, Lorinda Johnson, Sindhu R Varga, John Furst, Daniel E Temple, Jane Zecchin, Chiara Csomor, Eszter Lee, Amy Wisniacki, Nicolas Flint, Shaun M Reid, Juliet Rheumatology (Oxford) Clinical Science OBJECTIVES: The cytokine oncostatin M (OSM) is implicated in the pathology of SSc. Inhibiting OSM signalling using GSK2330811 (an anti-OSM monoclonal antibody) in patients with SSc has the potential to slow or stop the disease process. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled participants ≥18 years of age with active dcSSc. Participants were randomized 3:1 (GSK2330811:placebo) in one of two sequential cohorts to receive GSK2330811 (cohort 1: 100 mg; cohort 2: 300 mg) or placebo s.c. every other week for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety; blood and skin biopsy samples were collected to explore mechanistic effects on inflammation and fibrosis. Clinical efficacy was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants were randomized to placebo (n = 8), GSK2330811 100 mg (n = 3) or GSK2330811 300 mg (n = 24). Proof of mechanism, measured by coordinate effects on biomarkers of inflammation or fibrosis, was not demonstrated following GSK2330811 treatment. There were no meaningful differences between GSK2330811 and placebo for any efficacy endpoints. The safety and tolerability of GSK2330811 were not favourable in the 300 mg group, with on-target, dose-dependent adverse events related to decreases in haemoglobin and platelet count that were not observed in the 100 mg or placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Despite a robust and novel experimental medicine approach and evidence of target engagement, anticipated SSc-related biologic effects of GSK2330811 were not different from placebo and safety was unfavourable, suggesting OSM inhibition may not be a useful therapeutic strategy in SSc. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03041025; EudraCT, 2016-003417-95. Oxford University Press 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9788816/ /pubmed/35583273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac300 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Denton, Christopher P
del Galdo, Francesco
Khanna, Dinesh
Vonk, Madelon C
Chung, Lorinda
Johnson, Sindhu R
Varga, John
Furst, Daniel E
Temple, Jane
Zecchin, Chiara
Csomor, Eszter
Lee, Amy
Wisniacki, Nicolas
Flint, Shaun M
Reid, Juliet
Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis
title Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis
title_full Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis
title_fullStr Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis
title_short Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis
title_sort biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin m monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35583273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac300
work_keys_str_mv AT dentonchristopherp biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT delgaldofrancesco biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT khannadinesh biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT vonkmadelonc biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT chunglorinda biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT johnsonsindhur biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT vargajohn biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT furstdaniele biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT templejane biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT zecchinchiara biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT csomoreszter biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT leeamy biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT wisniackinicolas biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT flintshaunm biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis
AT reidjuliet biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis