Cargando…
Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis
OBJECTIVES: The cytokine oncostatin M (OSM) is implicated in the pathology of SSc. Inhibiting OSM signalling using GSK2330811 (an anti-OSM monoclonal antibody) in patients with SSc has the potential to slow or stop the disease process. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35583273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac300 |
_version_ | 1784858838393946112 |
---|---|
author | Denton, Christopher P del Galdo, Francesco Khanna, Dinesh Vonk, Madelon C Chung, Lorinda Johnson, Sindhu R Varga, John Furst, Daniel E Temple, Jane Zecchin, Chiara Csomor, Eszter Lee, Amy Wisniacki, Nicolas Flint, Shaun M Reid, Juliet |
author_facet | Denton, Christopher P del Galdo, Francesco Khanna, Dinesh Vonk, Madelon C Chung, Lorinda Johnson, Sindhu R Varga, John Furst, Daniel E Temple, Jane Zecchin, Chiara Csomor, Eszter Lee, Amy Wisniacki, Nicolas Flint, Shaun M Reid, Juliet |
author_sort | Denton, Christopher P |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The cytokine oncostatin M (OSM) is implicated in the pathology of SSc. Inhibiting OSM signalling using GSK2330811 (an anti-OSM monoclonal antibody) in patients with SSc has the potential to slow or stop the disease process. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled participants ≥18 years of age with active dcSSc. Participants were randomized 3:1 (GSK2330811:placebo) in one of two sequential cohorts to receive GSK2330811 (cohort 1: 100 mg; cohort 2: 300 mg) or placebo s.c. every other week for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety; blood and skin biopsy samples were collected to explore mechanistic effects on inflammation and fibrosis. Clinical efficacy was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants were randomized to placebo (n = 8), GSK2330811 100 mg (n = 3) or GSK2330811 300 mg (n = 24). Proof of mechanism, measured by coordinate effects on biomarkers of inflammation or fibrosis, was not demonstrated following GSK2330811 treatment. There were no meaningful differences between GSK2330811 and placebo for any efficacy endpoints. The safety and tolerability of GSK2330811 were not favourable in the 300 mg group, with on-target, dose-dependent adverse events related to decreases in haemoglobin and platelet count that were not observed in the 100 mg or placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Despite a robust and novel experimental medicine approach and evidence of target engagement, anticipated SSc-related biologic effects of GSK2330811 were not different from placebo and safety was unfavourable, suggesting OSM inhibition may not be a useful therapeutic strategy in SSc. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03041025; EudraCT, 2016-003417-95. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9788816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97888162022-12-30 Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis Denton, Christopher P del Galdo, Francesco Khanna, Dinesh Vonk, Madelon C Chung, Lorinda Johnson, Sindhu R Varga, John Furst, Daniel E Temple, Jane Zecchin, Chiara Csomor, Eszter Lee, Amy Wisniacki, Nicolas Flint, Shaun M Reid, Juliet Rheumatology (Oxford) Clinical Science OBJECTIVES: The cytokine oncostatin M (OSM) is implicated in the pathology of SSc. Inhibiting OSM signalling using GSK2330811 (an anti-OSM monoclonal antibody) in patients with SSc has the potential to slow or stop the disease process. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled participants ≥18 years of age with active dcSSc. Participants were randomized 3:1 (GSK2330811:placebo) in one of two sequential cohorts to receive GSK2330811 (cohort 1: 100 mg; cohort 2: 300 mg) or placebo s.c. every other week for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety; blood and skin biopsy samples were collected to explore mechanistic effects on inflammation and fibrosis. Clinical efficacy was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants were randomized to placebo (n = 8), GSK2330811 100 mg (n = 3) or GSK2330811 300 mg (n = 24). Proof of mechanism, measured by coordinate effects on biomarkers of inflammation or fibrosis, was not demonstrated following GSK2330811 treatment. There were no meaningful differences between GSK2330811 and placebo for any efficacy endpoints. The safety and tolerability of GSK2330811 were not favourable in the 300 mg group, with on-target, dose-dependent adverse events related to decreases in haemoglobin and platelet count that were not observed in the 100 mg or placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Despite a robust and novel experimental medicine approach and evidence of target engagement, anticipated SSc-related biologic effects of GSK2330811 were not different from placebo and safety was unfavourable, suggesting OSM inhibition may not be a useful therapeutic strategy in SSc. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03041025; EudraCT, 2016-003417-95. Oxford University Press 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9788816/ /pubmed/35583273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac300 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Denton, Christopher P del Galdo, Francesco Khanna, Dinesh Vonk, Madelon C Chung, Lorinda Johnson, Sindhu R Varga, John Furst, Daniel E Temple, Jane Zecchin, Chiara Csomor, Eszter Lee, Amy Wisniacki, Nicolas Flint, Shaun M Reid, Juliet Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis |
title | Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis |
title_full | Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis |
title_fullStr | Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis |
title_short | Biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin M monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis |
title_sort | biological and clinical insights from a randomized phase 2 study of an anti-oncostatin m monoclonal antibody in systemic sclerosis |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35583273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dentonchristopherp biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT delgaldofrancesco biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT khannadinesh biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT vonkmadelonc biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT chunglorinda biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT johnsonsindhur biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT vargajohn biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT furstdaniele biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT templejane biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT zecchinchiara biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT csomoreszter biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT leeamy biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT wisniackinicolas biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT flintshaunm biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis AT reidjuliet biologicalandclinicalinsightsfromarandomizedphase2studyofanantioncostatinmmonoclonalantibodyinsystemicsclerosis |