Cargando…

Change in End-Tidal Co (2) After Mini-Fluid Challenge to Determine Fluid Responsiveness

Distributive shock is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the ICU. IV fluid resuscitation is a vital intervention to improve cardiac output and end-organ perfusion during the initial resuscitation and for those who remain fluid responsive. Noninvasive measures of fluid responsiveness are lac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budnick, Isadore M., Popovich, John J., Barros, Andrew J., Kadl, Alexandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000816
_version_ 1784858872972836864
author Budnick, Isadore M.
Popovich, John J.
Barros, Andrew J.
Kadl, Alexandra
author_facet Budnick, Isadore M.
Popovich, John J.
Barros, Andrew J.
Kadl, Alexandra
author_sort Budnick, Isadore M.
collection PubMed
description Distributive shock is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the ICU. IV fluid resuscitation is a vital intervention to improve cardiac output and end-organ perfusion during the initial resuscitation and for those who remain fluid responsive. Noninvasive measures of fluid responsiveness are lacking. The aim of this study is to assess whether changes in end-tidal co(2) after mini-fluid challenge, or 250 mL bolus, can predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with distributive shock. DESIGN: Single-center prospective study. SETTING: Patients were enrolled from 2019 to 2021 from the medical ICU within a single academic hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight patients with paired measurements of fluid responsiveness as determined by bioreactance who were admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of distributive shock and on mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Stroke volume index (SVI), cardiac index, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and ETco(2) were measured before and after completion of a mini-fluid challenge. Test characteristics of change in ETco(2) (ΔETco(2)) greater than or equal to 2 after mini-fluid challenge to determine fluid responsiveness were calculated with percentage change in SVI greater than or equal to 10% used as the reference standard. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of a ΔETco(2) greater than or equal to 2 mm Hg as a predictor of a change in SVI greater than or equal to 10% following a mini-fluid challenge were 20.0% and 91.3%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.62. CONCLUSIONS: A ΔETco(2) greater than or equal to 2 mm Hg after mini-fluid challenge has limited test performance for determining fluid responsiveness in intubated patients with distributive shock.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9788972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97889722023-01-03 Change in End-Tidal Co (2) After Mini-Fluid Challenge to Determine Fluid Responsiveness Budnick, Isadore M. Popovich, John J. Barros, Andrew J. Kadl, Alexandra Crit Care Explor Brief Report Distributive shock is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the ICU. IV fluid resuscitation is a vital intervention to improve cardiac output and end-organ perfusion during the initial resuscitation and for those who remain fluid responsive. Noninvasive measures of fluid responsiveness are lacking. The aim of this study is to assess whether changes in end-tidal co(2) after mini-fluid challenge, or 250 mL bolus, can predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with distributive shock. DESIGN: Single-center prospective study. SETTING: Patients were enrolled from 2019 to 2021 from the medical ICU within a single academic hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight patients with paired measurements of fluid responsiveness as determined by bioreactance who were admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of distributive shock and on mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: Stroke volume index (SVI), cardiac index, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and ETco(2) were measured before and after completion of a mini-fluid challenge. Test characteristics of change in ETco(2) (ΔETco(2)) greater than or equal to 2 after mini-fluid challenge to determine fluid responsiveness were calculated with percentage change in SVI greater than or equal to 10% used as the reference standard. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of a ΔETco(2) greater than or equal to 2 mm Hg as a predictor of a change in SVI greater than or equal to 10% following a mini-fluid challenge were 20.0% and 91.3%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.62. CONCLUSIONS: A ΔETco(2) greater than or equal to 2 mm Hg after mini-fluid challenge has limited test performance for determining fluid responsiveness in intubated patients with distributive shock. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9788972/ /pubmed/36601564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000816 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Budnick, Isadore M.
Popovich, John J.
Barros, Andrew J.
Kadl, Alexandra
Change in End-Tidal Co (2) After Mini-Fluid Challenge to Determine Fluid Responsiveness
title Change in End-Tidal Co (2) After Mini-Fluid Challenge to Determine Fluid Responsiveness
title_full Change in End-Tidal Co (2) After Mini-Fluid Challenge to Determine Fluid Responsiveness
title_fullStr Change in End-Tidal Co (2) After Mini-Fluid Challenge to Determine Fluid Responsiveness
title_full_unstemmed Change in End-Tidal Co (2) After Mini-Fluid Challenge to Determine Fluid Responsiveness
title_short Change in End-Tidal Co (2) After Mini-Fluid Challenge to Determine Fluid Responsiveness
title_sort change in end-tidal co (2) after mini-fluid challenge to determine fluid responsiveness
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9788972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000816
work_keys_str_mv AT budnickisadorem changeinendtidalco2afterminifluidchallengetodeterminefluidresponsiveness
AT popovichjohnj changeinendtidalco2afterminifluidchallengetodeterminefluidresponsiveness
AT barrosandrewj changeinendtidalco2afterminifluidchallengetodeterminefluidresponsiveness
AT kadlalexandra changeinendtidalco2afterminifluidchallengetodeterminefluidresponsiveness