Cargando…
Red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo–hawk mimicry
The red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) used to be one of the most common hosts of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Nevertheless, during the last 30 years, there is increasing evidence from Central Europe that the occurrence of cuckoo chicks in shrike nests has become scarcer, and that in some l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9664 |
_version_ | 1784858883072720896 |
---|---|
author | Krausová, Ladislava Veselý, Petr Syrová, Michaela Antonová, Kateřina Fišer, Ondřej Chlumská, Vanda Pátková, Markéta Pužej, Šimon Fuchs, Roman |
author_facet | Krausová, Ladislava Veselý, Petr Syrová, Michaela Antonová, Kateřina Fišer, Ondřej Chlumská, Vanda Pátková, Markéta Pužej, Šimon Fuchs, Roman |
author_sort | Krausová, Ladislava |
collection | PubMed |
description | The red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) used to be one of the most common hosts of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Nevertheless, during the last 30 years, there is increasing evidence from Central Europe that the occurrence of cuckoo chicks in shrike nests has become scarcer, and that in some locations they have disappeared completely. Multiple hypotheses have been suggested to explain this abandonment. Here, we test the hypothesis that shrikes vigorously attack adult cuckoos, potentially resulting in ineffective parasitism. Adult common cuckoos resemble in appearance the Eurasian sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus), a common predator of small passerines. One hypothesis presumes that the cuckoo has evolved this mimicry to avoid attack by small passerines when searching for their nests. Our results show that shrikes defending their nests attacked cuckoos very vigorously, more often, and more intensively than they did sparrowhawks. In the presence of a sparrowhawk dummy, parent shrikes only produced alarm calls and flew over the dummy. This suggests that cuckoo–hawk mimicry is ineffective in the case of shrikes and that they attack them much more often than they do any other presented intruder. Therefore, this activity could possibly result in the abandonment of shrikes as potential hosts for cuckoos. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9789018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97890182022-12-28 Red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo–hawk mimicry Krausová, Ladislava Veselý, Petr Syrová, Michaela Antonová, Kateřina Fišer, Ondřej Chlumská, Vanda Pátková, Markéta Pužej, Šimon Fuchs, Roman Ecol Evol Research Articles The red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) used to be one of the most common hosts of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Nevertheless, during the last 30 years, there is increasing evidence from Central Europe that the occurrence of cuckoo chicks in shrike nests has become scarcer, and that in some locations they have disappeared completely. Multiple hypotheses have been suggested to explain this abandonment. Here, we test the hypothesis that shrikes vigorously attack adult cuckoos, potentially resulting in ineffective parasitism. Adult common cuckoos resemble in appearance the Eurasian sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus), a common predator of small passerines. One hypothesis presumes that the cuckoo has evolved this mimicry to avoid attack by small passerines when searching for their nests. Our results show that shrikes defending their nests attacked cuckoos very vigorously, more often, and more intensively than they did sparrowhawks. In the presence of a sparrowhawk dummy, parent shrikes only produced alarm calls and flew over the dummy. This suggests that cuckoo–hawk mimicry is ineffective in the case of shrikes and that they attack them much more often than they do any other presented intruder. Therefore, this activity could possibly result in the abandonment of shrikes as potential hosts for cuckoos. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9789018/ /pubmed/36582776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9664 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Krausová, Ladislava Veselý, Petr Syrová, Michaela Antonová, Kateřina Fišer, Ondřej Chlumská, Vanda Pátková, Markéta Pužej, Šimon Fuchs, Roman Red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo–hawk mimicry |
title | Red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo–hawk mimicry |
title_full | Red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo–hawk mimicry |
title_fullStr | Red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo–hawk mimicry |
title_full_unstemmed | Red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo–hawk mimicry |
title_short | Red‐backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo–hawk mimicry |
title_sort | red‐backed shrike (lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (cuculus canorus): an example of ineffective cuckoo–hawk mimicry |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9664 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krausovaladislava redbackedshrikelaniuscollurioversuscommoncuckoocuculuscanorusanexampleofineffectivecuckoohawkmimicry AT veselypetr redbackedshrikelaniuscollurioversuscommoncuckoocuculuscanorusanexampleofineffectivecuckoohawkmimicry AT syrovamichaela redbackedshrikelaniuscollurioversuscommoncuckoocuculuscanorusanexampleofineffectivecuckoohawkmimicry AT antonovakaterina redbackedshrikelaniuscollurioversuscommoncuckoocuculuscanorusanexampleofineffectivecuckoohawkmimicry AT fiserondrej redbackedshrikelaniuscollurioversuscommoncuckoocuculuscanorusanexampleofineffectivecuckoohawkmimicry AT chlumskavanda redbackedshrikelaniuscollurioversuscommoncuckoocuculuscanorusanexampleofineffectivecuckoohawkmimicry AT patkovamarketa redbackedshrikelaniuscollurioversuscommoncuckoocuculuscanorusanexampleofineffectivecuckoohawkmimicry AT puzejsimon redbackedshrikelaniuscollurioversuscommoncuckoocuculuscanorusanexampleofineffectivecuckoohawkmimicry AT fuchsroman redbackedshrikelaniuscollurioversuscommoncuckoocuculuscanorusanexampleofineffectivecuckoohawkmimicry |