Cargando…

Topical application of gemcitabine generates microvesicle particles in human and murine skin

Chemotherapy has remained the mainstay for the treatment of multiple types of cancers. In particular, topical use of chemotherapy has been used for skin cancers. Though effective, topical chemotherapy has been limited due to adverse effects such as local and even systemic toxicities. Our recent stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thyagarajan, Anita, Awasthi, Krishna, Rapp, Christine M., Johnson, R. Michael, Chen, Yanfang, Miller, Kelly L. R., Travers, Jeffrey B., Sahu, Ravi P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36504167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biof.1924
Descripción
Sumario:Chemotherapy has remained the mainstay for the treatment of multiple types of cancers. In particular, topical use of chemotherapy has been used for skin cancers. Though effective, topical chemotherapy has been limited due to adverse effects such as local and even systemic toxicities. Our recent studies demonstrated that exposure to pro‐oxidative stressors, including therapeutic agents induces the generation of extracellular vesicles known as microvesicle particles (MVP) which are dependent on activation of the Platelet‐activating factor‐receptor (PAFR), a G‐protein coupled receptor present on various cell types, and acid sphingomyelinase (aSMase), an enzyme required for MVP biogenesis. Based upon this premise, we tested the hypothesis that topical application of gemcitabine will induce MVP generation in human and murine skin. Our ex vivo studies using human skin explants demonstrate that gemcitabine treatment results in MVP generation in a dose‐dependent manner in a process blocked by PAFR antagonist and aSMase inhibitor. Importantly, gemcitabine‐induced MVPs carry PAFR agonists. To confirm the mechanisms, we employed PAFR‐expressing and deficient (Ptafr ( −/− )) mouse models as well as mice deficient in aSMase enzyme (Spmd1 ( −/− )). Similar to the findings using pharmacologic tools, genetic‐based approaches demonstrate that gemcitabine‐induced MVP release in WT mice was blunted in Ptafr ( −/− ) and Spmd1 ( −/− ) mice. These findings demonstrate a novel mechanism by which local chemotherapy can generate bioactive components as a bystander effect in a process that is dependent upon the PAFR‐aSMase pathway.