Cargando…
Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer
BACKGROUND: MammaPrint (MMP) helps clinicians identify the ideal time for adjuvant treatment for patients with early HR+/HER2− breast cancer. We aimed to validate a nomogram designed to predict probability of low risk of MMP results and to evaluate the difference in survival outcome between two grou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00604-z |
_version_ | 1784858917156683776 |
---|---|
author | Hwang, Young Sol Kim, Hwa Jung Kim, Jisun Chung, Il Yong Ko, Beom Seok Kim, Hee Jeong Lee, Jong Won Son, Byung Ho Ahn, Sei-Hyun Lee, Sae Byul |
author_facet | Hwang, Young Sol Kim, Hwa Jung Kim, Jisun Chung, Il Yong Ko, Beom Seok Kim, Hee Jeong Lee, Jong Won Son, Byung Ho Ahn, Sei-Hyun Lee, Sae Byul |
author_sort | Hwang, Young Sol |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: MammaPrint (MMP) helps clinicians identify the ideal time for adjuvant treatment for patients with early HR+/HER2− breast cancer. We aimed to validate a nomogram designed to predict probability of low risk of MMP results and to evaluate the difference in survival outcome between two groups divided by nomogram score. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 172 patients from Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, who underwent breast cancer surgery and MMP during 2020–2021. First, we validated the nomogram by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) and using calibration. Additionally, with the data of 1,835 T1-3N0-1M0 HR+/HER2− patients from Asan Medical Center during 2010–2013, we compared the disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates by Kaplan−Meier analysis between the two groups divided by nomogram total point (TP) of 183. RESULTS: The AUC calculated by validation of 172 patients was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–0.81). The discrimination and calibration of the prediction model were satisfactory following additional validation of 1835 patients. The high-risk and low-risk groups had different 5-year OS (97.9% vs. 98.1%, p = 0.056), DFS (98.6% vs. 99.4%, p = 0.008), and BCSS rates (98.6% vs. 99.4%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: For treatment decision-making among clinically high-risk patients with HR+/HER2− and node-positive disease, the nomogram showed satisfactory performance in predicting patients with low genomic risk. Survival outcome significantly differed between two groups divided by nomogram TP. More studies are needed to validate this model in international cohorts and large prospective cohorts from other institutions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-022-00604-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9789221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97892212022-12-25 Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer Hwang, Young Sol Kim, Hwa Jung Kim, Jisun Chung, Il Yong Ko, Beom Seok Kim, Hee Jeong Lee, Jong Won Son, Byung Ho Ahn, Sei-Hyun Lee, Sae Byul Discov Oncol Research BACKGROUND: MammaPrint (MMP) helps clinicians identify the ideal time for adjuvant treatment for patients with early HR+/HER2− breast cancer. We aimed to validate a nomogram designed to predict probability of low risk of MMP results and to evaluate the difference in survival outcome between two groups divided by nomogram score. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 172 patients from Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, who underwent breast cancer surgery and MMP during 2020–2021. First, we validated the nomogram by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) and using calibration. Additionally, with the data of 1,835 T1-3N0-1M0 HR+/HER2− patients from Asan Medical Center during 2010–2013, we compared the disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates by Kaplan−Meier analysis between the two groups divided by nomogram total point (TP) of 183. RESULTS: The AUC calculated by validation of 172 patients was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–0.81). The discrimination and calibration of the prediction model were satisfactory following additional validation of 1835 patients. The high-risk and low-risk groups had different 5-year OS (97.9% vs. 98.1%, p = 0.056), DFS (98.6% vs. 99.4%, p = 0.008), and BCSS rates (98.6% vs. 99.4%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: For treatment decision-making among clinically high-risk patients with HR+/HER2− and node-positive disease, the nomogram showed satisfactory performance in predicting patients with low genomic risk. Survival outcome significantly differed between two groups divided by nomogram TP. More studies are needed to validate this model in international cohorts and large prospective cohorts from other institutions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-022-00604-z. Springer US 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9789221/ /pubmed/36564593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00604-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Hwang, Young Sol Kim, Hwa Jung Kim, Jisun Chung, Il Yong Ko, Beom Seok Kim, Hee Jeong Lee, Jong Won Son, Byung Ho Ahn, Sei-Hyun Lee, Sae Byul Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer |
title | Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer |
title_full | Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer |
title_short | Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer |
title_sort | validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of mammaprint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00604-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hwangyoungsol validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer AT kimhwajung validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer AT kimjisun validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer AT chungilyong validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer AT kobeomseok validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer AT kimheejeong validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer AT leejongwon validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer AT sonbyungho validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer AT ahnseihyun validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer AT leesaebyul validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer |