Cargando…

Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer

BACKGROUND: MammaPrint (MMP) helps clinicians identify the ideal time for adjuvant treatment for patients with early HR+/HER2− breast cancer. We aimed to validate a nomogram designed to predict probability of low risk of MMP results and to evaluate the difference in survival outcome between two grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Young Sol, Kim, Hwa Jung, Kim, Jisun, Chung, Il Yong, Ko, Beom Seok, Kim, Hee Jeong, Lee, Jong Won, Son, Byung Ho, Ahn, Sei-Hyun, Lee, Sae Byul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00604-z
_version_ 1784858917156683776
author Hwang, Young Sol
Kim, Hwa Jung
Kim, Jisun
Chung, Il Yong
Ko, Beom Seok
Kim, Hee Jeong
Lee, Jong Won
Son, Byung Ho
Ahn, Sei-Hyun
Lee, Sae Byul
author_facet Hwang, Young Sol
Kim, Hwa Jung
Kim, Jisun
Chung, Il Yong
Ko, Beom Seok
Kim, Hee Jeong
Lee, Jong Won
Son, Byung Ho
Ahn, Sei-Hyun
Lee, Sae Byul
author_sort Hwang, Young Sol
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: MammaPrint (MMP) helps clinicians identify the ideal time for adjuvant treatment for patients with early HR+/HER2− breast cancer. We aimed to validate a nomogram designed to predict probability of low risk of MMP results and to evaluate the difference in survival outcome between two groups divided by nomogram score. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 172 patients from Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, who underwent breast cancer surgery and MMP during 2020–2021. First, we validated the nomogram by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) and using calibration. Additionally, with the data of 1,835 T1-3N0-1M0 HR+/HER2− patients from Asan Medical Center during 2010–2013, we compared the disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates by Kaplan−Meier analysis between the two groups divided by nomogram total point (TP) of 183. RESULTS: The AUC calculated by validation of 172 patients was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–0.81). The discrimination and calibration of the prediction model were satisfactory following additional validation of 1835 patients. The high-risk and low-risk groups had different 5-year OS (97.9% vs. 98.1%, p = 0.056), DFS (98.6% vs. 99.4%, p = 0.008), and BCSS rates (98.6% vs. 99.4%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: For treatment decision-making among clinically high-risk patients with HR+/HER2− and node-positive disease, the nomogram showed satisfactory performance in predicting patients with low genomic risk. Survival outcome significantly differed between two groups divided by nomogram TP. More studies are needed to validate this model in international cohorts and large prospective cohorts from other institutions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-022-00604-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9789221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97892212022-12-25 Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer Hwang, Young Sol Kim, Hwa Jung Kim, Jisun Chung, Il Yong Ko, Beom Seok Kim, Hee Jeong Lee, Jong Won Son, Byung Ho Ahn, Sei-Hyun Lee, Sae Byul Discov Oncol Research BACKGROUND: MammaPrint (MMP) helps clinicians identify the ideal time for adjuvant treatment for patients with early HR+/HER2− breast cancer. We aimed to validate a nomogram designed to predict probability of low risk of MMP results and to evaluate the difference in survival outcome between two groups divided by nomogram score. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 172 patients from Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, who underwent breast cancer surgery and MMP during 2020–2021. First, we validated the nomogram by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) and using calibration. Additionally, with the data of 1,835 T1-3N0-1M0 HR+/HER2− patients from Asan Medical Center during 2010–2013, we compared the disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates by Kaplan−Meier analysis between the two groups divided by nomogram total point (TP) of 183. RESULTS: The AUC calculated by validation of 172 patients was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–0.81). The discrimination and calibration of the prediction model were satisfactory following additional validation of 1835 patients. The high-risk and low-risk groups had different 5-year OS (97.9% vs. 98.1%, p = 0.056), DFS (98.6% vs. 99.4%, p = 0.008), and BCSS rates (98.6% vs. 99.4%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: For treatment decision-making among clinically high-risk patients with HR+/HER2− and node-positive disease, the nomogram showed satisfactory performance in predicting patients with low genomic risk. Survival outcome significantly differed between two groups divided by nomogram TP. More studies are needed to validate this model in international cohorts and large prospective cohorts from other institutions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-022-00604-z. Springer US 2022-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9789221/ /pubmed/36564593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00604-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Hwang, Young Sol
Kim, Hwa Jung
Kim, Jisun
Chung, Il Yong
Ko, Beom Seok
Kim, Hee Jeong
Lee, Jong Won
Son, Byung Ho
Ahn, Sei-Hyun
Lee, Sae Byul
Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer
title Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer
title_full Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer
title_fullStr Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer
title_short Validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of MammaPrint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer
title_sort validation study of a nomogram for predicting probability of low risk of mammaprint results in women with clinically high-risk breast cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00604-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangyoungsol validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer
AT kimhwajung validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer
AT kimjisun validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer
AT chungilyong validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer
AT kobeomseok validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer
AT kimheejeong validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer
AT leejongwon validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer
AT sonbyungho validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer
AT ahnseihyun validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer
AT leesaebyul validationstudyofanomogramforpredictingprobabilityoflowriskofmammaprintresultsinwomenwithclinicallyhighriskbreastcancer