Cargando…

Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to broadband clicks are strongly affected by dyssynchrony, or “latency dispersion”, of their frequency-specific cochlear contributions. Optimized chirp stimuli, designed to compensate for cochlear dispersion, can afford substantial increase in broadband ABR amplit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Boer, Jessica, Hardy, Alexander, Krumbholz, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35984541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00848-0
_version_ 1784858921111912448
author de Boer, Jessica
Hardy, Alexander
Krumbholz, Katrin
author_facet de Boer, Jessica
Hardy, Alexander
Krumbholz, Katrin
author_sort de Boer, Jessica
collection PubMed
description Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to broadband clicks are strongly affected by dyssynchrony, or “latency dispersion”, of their frequency-specific cochlear contributions. Optimized chirp stimuli, designed to compensate for cochlear dispersion, can afford substantial increase in broadband ABR amplitudes, particularly for the prominent wave-V deflection. Reports on the smaller wave I, however, which may be useful for measuring cochlear synaptopathy, have been mixed. This study aimed to test previous claims that ABR latency dispersion differs between waves I and V, and between males and females, and thus that using wave- and/or sex-tailored chirps may provide more reliable wave-I benefit. Using the derived-band technique, we measured responses from frequency-restricted (one-octave-wide) cochlear regions to energy-matched click and chirp stimuli. The derived-band responses’ latencies were used to assess any wave- and/or sex-related dispersion differences across bands, and their amplitudes, to evaluate any within-band dispersion differences. Our results suggest that sex-related dispersion difference within the lowest-frequency cochlear regions (< 1 kHz), where dispersion is generally greatest, may be a predominant driver of the often-reported sex difference in broadband ABR amplitude. At the same time, they showed no systematic dispersion difference between waves I and V. Instead, they suggest that reduced chirp benefit on wave I may arise as a result of chirp-induced desynchronization of on- and off-frequency responses generated at the same cochlear places, and resultant reduction in response contributions from higher-frequency cochlear regions, to which wave I is thought to be particularly sensitive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9789297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97892972022-12-25 Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response? de Boer, Jessica Hardy, Alexander Krumbholz, Katrin J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Research Article Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to broadband clicks are strongly affected by dyssynchrony, or “latency dispersion”, of their frequency-specific cochlear contributions. Optimized chirp stimuli, designed to compensate for cochlear dispersion, can afford substantial increase in broadband ABR amplitudes, particularly for the prominent wave-V deflection. Reports on the smaller wave I, however, which may be useful for measuring cochlear synaptopathy, have been mixed. This study aimed to test previous claims that ABR latency dispersion differs between waves I and V, and between males and females, and thus that using wave- and/or sex-tailored chirps may provide more reliable wave-I benefit. Using the derived-band technique, we measured responses from frequency-restricted (one-octave-wide) cochlear regions to energy-matched click and chirp stimuli. The derived-band responses’ latencies were used to assess any wave- and/or sex-related dispersion differences across bands, and their amplitudes, to evaluate any within-band dispersion differences. Our results suggest that sex-related dispersion difference within the lowest-frequency cochlear regions (< 1 kHz), where dispersion is generally greatest, may be a predominant driver of the often-reported sex difference in broadband ABR amplitude. At the same time, they showed no systematic dispersion difference between waves I and V. Instead, they suggest that reduced chirp benefit on wave I may arise as a result of chirp-induced desynchronization of on- and off-frequency responses generated at the same cochlear places, and resultant reduction in response contributions from higher-frequency cochlear regions, to which wave I is thought to be particularly sensitive. Springer US 2022-08-19 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9789297/ /pubmed/35984541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00848-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Article
de Boer, Jessica
Hardy, Alexander
Krumbholz, Katrin
Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?
title Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?
title_full Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?
title_fullStr Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?
title_full_unstemmed Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?
title_short Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?
title_sort could tailored chirp stimuli benefit measurement of the supra-threshold auditory brainstem wave-i response?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35984541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-022-00848-0
work_keys_str_mv AT deboerjessica couldtailoredchirpstimulibenefitmeasurementofthesuprathresholdauditorybrainstemwaveiresponse
AT hardyalexander couldtailoredchirpstimulibenefitmeasurementofthesuprathresholdauditorybrainstemwaveiresponse
AT krumbholzkatrin couldtailoredchirpstimulibenefitmeasurementofthesuprathresholdauditorybrainstemwaveiresponse