Cargando…

Bone Morphogenetic Protein as Bone Additive around Dental Implant and its Impact on Osseointegration: a Systematic Review

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), a potential osteoinductive agent, was systematically reviewed for merits and demerits when used as a bone additive that was intervened during the surgical phase of dental implant placement; and suitable drug carriers that could withstand th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raza, Fathima Banu, Vijayaragavalu, Sivakumar, Vaidyanathan, Anand Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588970
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.90931.1536
_version_ 1784858929071652864
author Raza, Fathima Banu
Vijayaragavalu, Sivakumar
Vaidyanathan, Anand Kumar
author_facet Raza, Fathima Banu
Vijayaragavalu, Sivakumar
Vaidyanathan, Anand Kumar
author_sort Raza, Fathima Banu
collection PubMed
description STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), a potential osteoinductive agent, was systematically reviewed for merits and demerits when used as a bone additive that was intervened during the surgical phase of dental implant placement; and suitable drug carriers that could withstand the functional load and deliver BMP at its lowest concentration. PURPOSE: To identify the carriers and concentration of BMP acceptable during surgical phase of implant placement and evaluate its efficacy in bone gain and osseointegration. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study design was systematic review. Literature search as per PICO format was carried out within a time range from 2000 to July 2021. The review fol-lowed PRISMA guidelines and registered with the PROSPERO (CRD42020171667). The focus question included the population with an intra-oral implant placed in both animal and human models that were intervened with BMP-2 as an external additive biomaterial during the surgical phase. 2631 articles selected from the initial search were systematically filtered and yielded 16 articles that were qualitatively analysed RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability and level of agreement were 93.71%, κ(Kappa)>0.81 re-spectively. Results revealed the collagen carrier was commonly used for BMP delivery but lacked the property to withstand functional load and sustained release. BMP concentration varied in the range of 0.215μg to 0.8mg and the study revealed significantly indifferent out-come with low dose compared to the highest dose. BMP supplement showed better osseointe-gration in comparison with non-supplemented sites during the early period (within 6 months). CONCLUSION: BMP at lower concentrations and with appropriate carriers, collagen sponge, hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) with a bio ceramic bulking agent, and poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) reinforced with gelatin/HA/TCP accelerated bone growth during the initial stages of healing. Further long-term clinical trials for dental implant, analysing the sustained release of BMP with biodegradable and load-bearing carriers should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9789332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97893322022-12-30 Bone Morphogenetic Protein as Bone Additive around Dental Implant and its Impact on Osseointegration: a Systematic Review Raza, Fathima Banu Vijayaragavalu, Sivakumar Vaidyanathan, Anand Kumar J Dent (Shiraz) Systematic Review STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), a potential osteoinductive agent, was systematically reviewed for merits and demerits when used as a bone additive that was intervened during the surgical phase of dental implant placement; and suitable drug carriers that could withstand the functional load and deliver BMP at its lowest concentration. PURPOSE: To identify the carriers and concentration of BMP acceptable during surgical phase of implant placement and evaluate its efficacy in bone gain and osseointegration. MATERIALS AND METHOD: The study design was systematic review. Literature search as per PICO format was carried out within a time range from 2000 to July 2021. The review fol-lowed PRISMA guidelines and registered with the PROSPERO (CRD42020171667). The focus question included the population with an intra-oral implant placed in both animal and human models that were intervened with BMP-2 as an external additive biomaterial during the surgical phase. 2631 articles selected from the initial search were systematically filtered and yielded 16 articles that were qualitatively analysed RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability and level of agreement were 93.71%, κ(Kappa)>0.81 re-spectively. Results revealed the collagen carrier was commonly used for BMP delivery but lacked the property to withstand functional load and sustained release. BMP concentration varied in the range of 0.215μg to 0.8mg and the study revealed significantly indifferent out-come with low dose compared to the highest dose. BMP supplement showed better osseointe-gration in comparison with non-supplemented sites during the early period (within 6 months). CONCLUSION: BMP at lower concentrations and with appropriate carriers, collagen sponge, hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) with a bio ceramic bulking agent, and poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) reinforced with gelatin/HA/TCP accelerated bone growth during the initial stages of healing. Further long-term clinical trials for dental implant, analysing the sustained release of BMP with biodegradable and load-bearing carriers should be considered. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9789332/ /pubmed/36588970 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.90931.1536 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Raza, Fathima Banu
Vijayaragavalu, Sivakumar
Vaidyanathan, Anand Kumar
Bone Morphogenetic Protein as Bone Additive around Dental Implant and its Impact on Osseointegration: a Systematic Review
title Bone Morphogenetic Protein as Bone Additive around Dental Implant and its Impact on Osseointegration: a Systematic Review
title_full Bone Morphogenetic Protein as Bone Additive around Dental Implant and its Impact on Osseointegration: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Bone Morphogenetic Protein as Bone Additive around Dental Implant and its Impact on Osseointegration: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Bone Morphogenetic Protein as Bone Additive around Dental Implant and its Impact on Osseointegration: a Systematic Review
title_short Bone Morphogenetic Protein as Bone Additive around Dental Implant and its Impact on Osseointegration: a Systematic Review
title_sort bone morphogenetic protein as bone additive around dental implant and its impact on osseointegration: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588970
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.90931.1536
work_keys_str_mv AT razafathimabanu bonemorphogeneticproteinasboneadditivearounddentalimplantanditsimpactonosseointegrationasystematicreview
AT vijayaragavalusivakumar bonemorphogeneticproteinasboneadditivearounddentalimplantanditsimpactonosseointegrationasystematicreview
AT vaidyanathananandkumar bonemorphogeneticproteinasboneadditivearounddentalimplantanditsimpactonosseointegrationasystematicreview