Cargando…

Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions

Bird-window collisions are a major source of human-caused mortality for which there are multiple mitigation and prevention options available. Despite growing availability of products designed to reduce collisions (e.g., glass with etched patterns or markers and films adhered over existing glass), fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riggs, Georgia J., Barton, Christine M., Riding, Corey S., O’Connell, Timothy J., Loss, Scott R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w
_version_ 1784858973206216704
author Riggs, Georgia J.
Barton, Christine M.
Riding, Corey S.
O’Connell, Timothy J.
Loss, Scott R.
author_facet Riggs, Georgia J.
Barton, Christine M.
Riding, Corey S.
O’Connell, Timothy J.
Loss, Scott R.
author_sort Riggs, Georgia J.
collection PubMed
description Bird-window collisions are a major source of human-caused mortality for which there are multiple mitigation and prevention options available. Despite growing availability of products designed to reduce collisions (e.g., glass with etched patterns or markers and films adhered over existing glass), few replicated field tests have been conducted to assess their effectiveness after installation on glass. We conducted a field study to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially marketed product (Feather Friendly(®) markers) in reducing bird-window collisions at glass-walled bus shelters in Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA. This study included a before-after control-impact (BACI) analysis comparing numbers of collisions at 18 bus shelters in both pre-treatment (2016) and post-treatment (2020) periods, and an analysis comparing 18 treated and 18 untreated shelters during 2020. For the BACI analysis, collisions were significantly reduced between 2016 and 2020 at shelters treated with the Feather Friendly(®) markers even though collisions increased at shelters that remained untreated. For the 2020 analysis, there were significantly fewer collisions at treated than untreated shelters. Relative to a baseline study in 2016, we estimated that treating half of Stillwater’s bus shelters resulted in a 64% reduction in total annual bird collisions. Together, these analyses provide a rigorous field test of the effectiveness of this treatment option in reducing bird-window collisions. Our research provides a model for similar studies at both bus shelters and buildings to evaluate and compare products designed to reduce bird-window collisions, and therefore, contribute to reducing this major mortality source affecting bird populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9789516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97895162022-12-27 Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions Riggs, Georgia J. Barton, Christine M. Riding, Corey S. O’Connell, Timothy J. Loss, Scott R. Urban Ecosyst Article Bird-window collisions are a major source of human-caused mortality for which there are multiple mitigation and prevention options available. Despite growing availability of products designed to reduce collisions (e.g., glass with etched patterns or markers and films adhered over existing glass), few replicated field tests have been conducted to assess their effectiveness after installation on glass. We conducted a field study to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially marketed product (Feather Friendly(®) markers) in reducing bird-window collisions at glass-walled bus shelters in Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA. This study included a before-after control-impact (BACI) analysis comparing numbers of collisions at 18 bus shelters in both pre-treatment (2016) and post-treatment (2020) periods, and an analysis comparing 18 treated and 18 untreated shelters during 2020. For the BACI analysis, collisions were significantly reduced between 2016 and 2020 at shelters treated with the Feather Friendly(®) markers even though collisions increased at shelters that remained untreated. For the 2020 analysis, there were significantly fewer collisions at treated than untreated shelters. Relative to a baseline study in 2016, we estimated that treating half of Stillwater’s bus shelters resulted in a 64% reduction in total annual bird collisions. Together, these analyses provide a rigorous field test of the effectiveness of this treatment option in reducing bird-window collisions. Our research provides a model for similar studies at both bus shelters and buildings to evaluate and compare products designed to reduce bird-window collisions, and therefore, contribute to reducing this major mortality source affecting bird populations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w. Springer US 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9789516/ /pubmed/36588777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Riggs, Georgia J.
Barton, Christine M.
Riding, Corey S.
O’Connell, Timothy J.
Loss, Scott R.
Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions
title Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions
title_full Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions
title_fullStr Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions
title_full_unstemmed Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions
title_short Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions
title_sort field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w
work_keys_str_mv AT riggsgeorgiaj fieldtestingeffectivenessofwindowmarkersinreducingbirdwindowcollisions
AT bartonchristinem fieldtestingeffectivenessofwindowmarkersinreducingbirdwindowcollisions
AT ridingcoreys fieldtestingeffectivenessofwindowmarkersinreducingbirdwindowcollisions
AT oconnelltimothyj fieldtestingeffectivenessofwindowmarkersinreducingbirdwindowcollisions
AT lossscottr fieldtestingeffectivenessofwindowmarkersinreducingbirdwindowcollisions