Cargando…
Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness
BACKGROUND: Adequate training and preparation of medical first responders (MFRs) are essential for an optimal performance in highly demanding situations like disasters (e.g., mass accidents, natural catastrophes). The training needs to be as effective as possible, because precise and effective behav...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36566227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8 |
_version_ | 1784858973715824640 |
---|---|
author | Baetzner, Anke S. Wespi, Rafael Hill, Yannick Gyllencreutz, Lina Sauter, Thomas C. Saveman, Britt-Inger Mohr, Stefan Regal, Georg Wrzus, Cornelia Frenkel, Marie O. |
author_facet | Baetzner, Anke S. Wespi, Rafael Hill, Yannick Gyllencreutz, Lina Sauter, Thomas C. Saveman, Britt-Inger Mohr, Stefan Regal, Georg Wrzus, Cornelia Frenkel, Marie O. |
author_sort | Baetzner, Anke S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adequate training and preparation of medical first responders (MFRs) are essential for an optimal performance in highly demanding situations like disasters (e.g., mass accidents, natural catastrophes). The training needs to be as effective as possible, because precise and effective behavior of MFRs under stress is central for ensuring patients’ survival and recovery. This systematic review offers an overview of scientifically evaluated training methods used to prepare MFRs for disasters. It identifies different effectiveness indicators and provides an additional analysis of how and to what extent the innovative training technologies virtual (VR) and mixed reality (MR) are included in disaster training research. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and focused specifically on (quasi-)experimental studies published between January 2010 and September 2021. The literature search was conducted via Web of Science and PubMed and led to the inclusion of 55 articles. RESULTS: The search identified several types of training, including traditional (e.g., lectures, real-life scenario training) and technology-based training (e.g., computer-based learning, educational videos). Most trainings consisted of more than one method. The effectiveness of the trainings was mainly assessed through pre-post comparisons of knowledge tests or self-reported measures although some studies also used behavioral performance measures (e.g., triage accuracy). While all methods demonstrated effectiveness, the literature indicates that technology-based methods often lead to similar or greater training outcomes than traditional trainings. Currently, few studies systematically evaluated immersive VR and MR training. CONCLUSION: To determine the success of a training, proper and scientifically sound evaluation is necessary. Of the effectiveness indicators found, performance assessments in simulated scenarios are closest to the target behavior during real disasters. For valid yet inexpensive evaluations, objectively assessible performance measures, such as accuracy, time, and order of actions could be used. However, performance assessments have not been applied often. Furthermore, we found that technology-based training methods represent a promising approach to train many MFRs repeatedly and efficiently. These technologies offer great potential to supplement or partially replace traditional training. Further research is needed on those methods that have been underrepresented, especially serious gaming, immersive VR, and MR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9789518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97895182022-12-25 Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness Baetzner, Anke S. Wespi, Rafael Hill, Yannick Gyllencreutz, Lina Sauter, Thomas C. Saveman, Britt-Inger Mohr, Stefan Regal, Georg Wrzus, Cornelia Frenkel, Marie O. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Review BACKGROUND: Adequate training and preparation of medical first responders (MFRs) are essential for an optimal performance in highly demanding situations like disasters (e.g., mass accidents, natural catastrophes). The training needs to be as effective as possible, because precise and effective behavior of MFRs under stress is central for ensuring patients’ survival and recovery. This systematic review offers an overview of scientifically evaluated training methods used to prepare MFRs for disasters. It identifies different effectiveness indicators and provides an additional analysis of how and to what extent the innovative training technologies virtual (VR) and mixed reality (MR) are included in disaster training research. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and focused specifically on (quasi-)experimental studies published between January 2010 and September 2021. The literature search was conducted via Web of Science and PubMed and led to the inclusion of 55 articles. RESULTS: The search identified several types of training, including traditional (e.g., lectures, real-life scenario training) and technology-based training (e.g., computer-based learning, educational videos). Most trainings consisted of more than one method. The effectiveness of the trainings was mainly assessed through pre-post comparisons of knowledge tests or self-reported measures although some studies also used behavioral performance measures (e.g., triage accuracy). While all methods demonstrated effectiveness, the literature indicates that technology-based methods often lead to similar or greater training outcomes than traditional trainings. Currently, few studies systematically evaluated immersive VR and MR training. CONCLUSION: To determine the success of a training, proper and scientifically sound evaluation is necessary. Of the effectiveness indicators found, performance assessments in simulated scenarios are closest to the target behavior during real disasters. For valid yet inexpensive evaluations, objectively assessible performance measures, such as accuracy, time, and order of actions could be used. However, performance assessments have not been applied often. Furthermore, we found that technology-based training methods represent a promising approach to train many MFRs repeatedly and efficiently. These technologies offer great potential to supplement or partially replace traditional training. Further research is needed on those methods that have been underrepresented, especially serious gaming, immersive VR, and MR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8. BioMed Central 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9789518/ /pubmed/36566227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Baetzner, Anke S. Wespi, Rafael Hill, Yannick Gyllencreutz, Lina Sauter, Thomas C. Saveman, Britt-Inger Mohr, Stefan Regal, Georg Wrzus, Cornelia Frenkel, Marie O. Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness |
title | Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness |
title_full | Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness |
title_fullStr | Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness |
title_full_unstemmed | Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness |
title_short | Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness |
title_sort | preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36566227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baetznerankes preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness AT wespirafael preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness AT hillyannick preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness AT gyllencreutzlina preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness AT sauterthomasc preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness AT savemanbrittinger preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness AT mohrstefan preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness AT regalgeorg preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness AT wrzuscornelia preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness AT frenkelmarieo preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness |