Cargando…

Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness

BACKGROUND: Adequate training and preparation of medical first responders (MFRs) are essential for an optimal performance in highly demanding situations like disasters (e.g., mass accidents, natural catastrophes). The training needs to be as effective as possible, because precise and effective behav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baetzner, Anke S., Wespi, Rafael, Hill, Yannick, Gyllencreutz, Lina, Sauter, Thomas C., Saveman, Britt-Inger, Mohr, Stefan, Regal, Georg, Wrzus, Cornelia, Frenkel, Marie O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36566227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8
_version_ 1784858973715824640
author Baetzner, Anke S.
Wespi, Rafael
Hill, Yannick
Gyllencreutz, Lina
Sauter, Thomas C.
Saveman, Britt-Inger
Mohr, Stefan
Regal, Georg
Wrzus, Cornelia
Frenkel, Marie O.
author_facet Baetzner, Anke S.
Wespi, Rafael
Hill, Yannick
Gyllencreutz, Lina
Sauter, Thomas C.
Saveman, Britt-Inger
Mohr, Stefan
Regal, Georg
Wrzus, Cornelia
Frenkel, Marie O.
author_sort Baetzner, Anke S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adequate training and preparation of medical first responders (MFRs) are essential for an optimal performance in highly demanding situations like disasters (e.g., mass accidents, natural catastrophes). The training needs to be as effective as possible, because precise and effective behavior of MFRs under stress is central for ensuring patients’ survival and recovery. This systematic review offers an overview of scientifically evaluated training methods used to prepare MFRs for disasters. It identifies different effectiveness indicators and provides an additional analysis of how and to what extent the innovative training technologies virtual (VR) and mixed reality (MR) are included in disaster training research. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and focused specifically on (quasi-)experimental studies published between January 2010 and September 2021. The literature search was conducted via Web of Science and PubMed and led to the inclusion of 55 articles. RESULTS: The search identified several types of training, including traditional (e.g., lectures, real-life scenario training) and technology-based training (e.g., computer-based learning, educational videos). Most trainings consisted of more than one method. The effectiveness of the trainings was mainly assessed through pre-post comparisons of knowledge tests or self-reported measures although some studies also used behavioral performance measures (e.g., triage accuracy). While all methods demonstrated effectiveness, the literature indicates that technology-based methods often lead to similar or greater training outcomes than traditional trainings. Currently, few studies systematically evaluated immersive VR and MR training. CONCLUSION: To determine the success of a training, proper and scientifically sound evaluation is necessary. Of the effectiveness indicators found, performance assessments in simulated scenarios are closest to the target behavior during real disasters. For valid yet inexpensive evaluations, objectively assessible performance measures, such as accuracy, time, and order of actions could be used. However, performance assessments have not been applied often. Furthermore, we found that technology-based training methods represent a promising approach to train many MFRs repeatedly and efficiently. These technologies offer great potential to supplement or partially replace traditional training. Further research is needed on those methods that have been underrepresented, especially serious gaming, immersive VR, and MR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9789518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97895182022-12-25 Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness Baetzner, Anke S. Wespi, Rafael Hill, Yannick Gyllencreutz, Lina Sauter, Thomas C. Saveman, Britt-Inger Mohr, Stefan Regal, Georg Wrzus, Cornelia Frenkel, Marie O. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Review BACKGROUND: Adequate training and preparation of medical first responders (MFRs) are essential for an optimal performance in highly demanding situations like disasters (e.g., mass accidents, natural catastrophes). The training needs to be as effective as possible, because precise and effective behavior of MFRs under stress is central for ensuring patients’ survival and recovery. This systematic review offers an overview of scientifically evaluated training methods used to prepare MFRs for disasters. It identifies different effectiveness indicators and provides an additional analysis of how and to what extent the innovative training technologies virtual (VR) and mixed reality (MR) are included in disaster training research. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and focused specifically on (quasi-)experimental studies published between January 2010 and September 2021. The literature search was conducted via Web of Science and PubMed and led to the inclusion of 55 articles. RESULTS: The search identified several types of training, including traditional (e.g., lectures, real-life scenario training) and technology-based training (e.g., computer-based learning, educational videos). Most trainings consisted of more than one method. The effectiveness of the trainings was mainly assessed through pre-post comparisons of knowledge tests or self-reported measures although some studies also used behavioral performance measures (e.g., triage accuracy). While all methods demonstrated effectiveness, the literature indicates that technology-based methods often lead to similar or greater training outcomes than traditional trainings. Currently, few studies systematically evaluated immersive VR and MR training. CONCLUSION: To determine the success of a training, proper and scientifically sound evaluation is necessary. Of the effectiveness indicators found, performance assessments in simulated scenarios are closest to the target behavior during real disasters. For valid yet inexpensive evaluations, objectively assessible performance measures, such as accuracy, time, and order of actions could be used. However, performance assessments have not been applied often. Furthermore, we found that technology-based training methods represent a promising approach to train many MFRs repeatedly and efficiently. These technologies offer great potential to supplement or partially replace traditional training. Further research is needed on those methods that have been underrepresented, especially serious gaming, immersive VR, and MR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8. BioMed Central 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9789518/ /pubmed/36566227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Baetzner, Anke S.
Wespi, Rafael
Hill, Yannick
Gyllencreutz, Lina
Sauter, Thomas C.
Saveman, Britt-Inger
Mohr, Stefan
Regal, Georg
Wrzus, Cornelia
Frenkel, Marie O.
Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness
title Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness
title_full Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness
title_fullStr Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness
title_short Preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness
title_sort preparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36566227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-022-01056-8
work_keys_str_mv AT baetznerankes preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness
AT wespirafael preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness
AT hillyannick preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness
AT gyllencreutzlina preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness
AT sauterthomasc preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness
AT savemanbrittinger preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness
AT mohrstefan preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness
AT regalgeorg preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness
AT wrzuscornelia preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness
AT frenkelmarieo preparingmedicalfirstrespondersforcrisesasystematicliteraturereviewofdisastertrainingprogramsandtheireffectiveness