Cargando…
Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature
BACKGROUND: Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing mortality by upwards of twenty percent. However, screening is not universally available and uptake is variable and socially patterned. Understanding screening behaviour is integral to designing a service that serves its population a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8 |
_version_ | 1784859002322026496 |
---|---|
author | Cavers, Debbie Nelson, Mia Rostron, Jasmin Robb, Kathryn A. Brown, Lynsey R. Campbell, Christine Akram, Ahsan R. Dickie, Graeme Mackean, Melanie van Beek, Edwin J. R. Sullivan, Frank Steele, Robert J. Neilson, Aileen R. Weller, David |
author_facet | Cavers, Debbie Nelson, Mia Rostron, Jasmin Robb, Kathryn A. Brown, Lynsey R. Campbell, Christine Akram, Ahsan R. Dickie, Graeme Mackean, Melanie van Beek, Edwin J. R. Sullivan, Frank Steele, Robert J. Neilson, Aileen R. Weller, David |
author_sort | Cavers, Debbie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing mortality by upwards of twenty percent. However, screening is not universally available and uptake is variable and socially patterned. Understanding screening behaviour is integral to designing a service that serves its population and promotes equitable uptake. We sought to review the literature to identify barriers and facilitators to screening to inform the development of a pilot lung screening study in Scotland. METHODS: We used Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology and PRISMA-ScR framework to identify relevant literature to meet the study aims. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies published between January 2000 and May 2021 were identified and reviewed by two reviewers for inclusion, using a list of search terms developed by the study team and adapted for chosen databases. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles met the final inclusion criteria. Articles were published between 2003 and 2021 and came from high income countries. Following data extraction and synthesis, findings were organised into four categories: Awareness of lung screening, Enthusiasm for lung screening, Barriers to lung screening, and Facilitators or ways of promoting uptake of lung screening. Awareness of lung screening was low while enthusiasm was high. Barriers to screening included fear of a cancer diagnosis, low perceived risk of lung cancer as well as practical barriers of cost, travel and time off work. Being health conscious, provider endorsement and seeking reassurance were all identified as facilitators of screening participation. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding patient reported barriers and facilitators to lung screening can help inform the implementation of future lung screening pilots and national lung screening programmes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9789658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97896582022-12-25 Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature Cavers, Debbie Nelson, Mia Rostron, Jasmin Robb, Kathryn A. Brown, Lynsey R. Campbell, Christine Akram, Ahsan R. Dickie, Graeme Mackean, Melanie van Beek, Edwin J. R. Sullivan, Frank Steele, Robert J. Neilson, Aileen R. Weller, David Respir Res Review BACKGROUND: Targeted lung cancer screening is effective in reducing mortality by upwards of twenty percent. However, screening is not universally available and uptake is variable and socially patterned. Understanding screening behaviour is integral to designing a service that serves its population and promotes equitable uptake. We sought to review the literature to identify barriers and facilitators to screening to inform the development of a pilot lung screening study in Scotland. METHODS: We used Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology and PRISMA-ScR framework to identify relevant literature to meet the study aims. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies published between January 2000 and May 2021 were identified and reviewed by two reviewers for inclusion, using a list of search terms developed by the study team and adapted for chosen databases. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles met the final inclusion criteria. Articles were published between 2003 and 2021 and came from high income countries. Following data extraction and synthesis, findings were organised into four categories: Awareness of lung screening, Enthusiasm for lung screening, Barriers to lung screening, and Facilitators or ways of promoting uptake of lung screening. Awareness of lung screening was low while enthusiasm was high. Barriers to screening included fear of a cancer diagnosis, low perceived risk of lung cancer as well as practical barriers of cost, travel and time off work. Being health conscious, provider endorsement and seeking reassurance were all identified as facilitators of screening participation. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding patient reported barriers and facilitators to lung screening can help inform the implementation of future lung screening pilots and national lung screening programmes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8. BioMed Central 2022-12-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9789658/ /pubmed/36564817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Cavers, Debbie Nelson, Mia Rostron, Jasmin Robb, Kathryn A. Brown, Lynsey R. Campbell, Christine Akram, Ahsan R. Dickie, Graeme Mackean, Melanie van Beek, Edwin J. R. Sullivan, Frank Steele, Robert J. Neilson, Aileen R. Weller, David Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature |
title | Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature |
title_full | Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature |
title_fullStr | Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature |
title_short | Understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature |
title_sort | understanding patient barriers and facilitators to uptake of lung screening using low dose computed tomography: a mixed methods scoping review of the current literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36564817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02255-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caversdebbie understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT nelsonmia understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT rostronjasmin understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT robbkathryna understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT brownlynseyr understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT campbellchristine understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT akramahsanr understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT dickiegraeme understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT mackeanmelanie understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT vanbeekedwinjr understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT sullivanfrank understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT steelerobertj understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT neilsonaileenr understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature AT wellerdavid understandingpatientbarriersandfacilitatorstouptakeoflungscreeningusinglowdosecomputedtomographyamixedmethodsscopingreviewofthecurrentliterature |