Cargando…

Relapsing low-flow alarms due to suboptimal alignment of the left ventricular assist device inflow cannula

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study investigated the correlation between the angular position of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) inflow cannula and relapsing low-flow alarms. METHODS: Medical charts were reviewed of all patients with HeartMate 3 LVAD support for relapsing low-flow alarms....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zijderhand, Casper F, Knol, Wiebe G, Budde, Ricardo P J, van der Heiden, Cornelis W, Veen, Kevin M, Sjatskig, Jelena, Manintveld, Olivier C, Constantinescu, Alina A, Birim, Ozcan, Bekkers, Jos A, Bogers, Ad J J C, Caliskan, Kadir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789739/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac415
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study investigated the correlation between the angular position of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) inflow cannula and relapsing low-flow alarms. METHODS: Medical charts were reviewed of all patients with HeartMate 3 LVAD support for relapsing low-flow alarms. A standardized protocol was created to measure the angular position with a contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan. Statistics were done using a gamma frailty model with a constant rate function. RESULTS: For this analysis, 48 LVAD-supported patients were included. The majority of the patients were male (79%) with a median age of 57 years and a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range: 19–41). Low-flow alarm(s) were experienced in 30 (63%) patients. Angulation towards the septal–lateral plane showed a significant increase in low-flow alarms over time with a constant rate function of 0.031 increase in low-flow alarms per month of follow-up per increasing degree of angulation (P = 0.048). When dividing this group using an optimal cut-off point, a significant increase in low-flow alarms was observed when the septal–lateral angulation was 28° or more (P = 0.001). Anterior–posterior and maximal inflow cannula angulation did not show a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed an increasing number of low-flow alarms when the degrees of LVAD inflow cannula expand towards the septal–lateral plane. This emphasizes the importance of the LVAD inflow cannula angular position to prevent relapsing low-flow alarms with the risk of diminished quality of life and morbidity.