Cargando…
Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics
Luxation injuries and other stimuli may lead to a pulp canal obliteration (PCO). Even though the apposition of tertiary dentine is a sign of a vital pulp, in some cases root canal treatment is indicated in the long term due to apical periodontitis or pulpitis. Depending on the extent of PCO, root ca...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35075661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13687 |
_version_ | 1784859121215864832 |
---|---|
author | Connert, Thomas Weiger, Roland Krastl, Gabriel |
author_facet | Connert, Thomas Weiger, Roland Krastl, Gabriel |
author_sort | Connert, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Luxation injuries and other stimuli may lead to a pulp canal obliteration (PCO). Even though the apposition of tertiary dentine is a sign of a vital pulp, in some cases root canal treatment is indicated in the long term due to apical periodontitis or pulpitis. Depending on the extent of PCO, root canal treatment may be challenging even for experienced and well‐equipped endodontic specialists. The ‘guided endodontics’ (GE) technique was introduced 6 years ago as an alternative to conventional access cavity preparation for teeth with PCO and apical pathosis or irreversible pulpitis. Using three‐dimensional radiological imaging such as cone‐beam computed tomography and a digital surface scan, an optimal access to the orifice of the calcified root canal can be planned virtually with appropriate software. GE is implemented either with the help of templates analogous to guided implantology (= static navigation) or by means of dynamic navigation based on a camera‐marker system. GE has emerged as a field of research in the last 6 years with very promising laboratory‐based results regarding the accuracy of guided endodontic access cavities for both static and dynamic navigation. Clinical implementation seems to provide favourable results, but the evidence is mainly based on numerous case reports and a few case series. This narrative review aims to provide an update on the present status of GE and to identify relevant research areas that could contribute to further improvements of this technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9790195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97901952022-12-28 Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics Connert, Thomas Weiger, Roland Krastl, Gabriel Int Endod J Reviews Luxation injuries and other stimuli may lead to a pulp canal obliteration (PCO). Even though the apposition of tertiary dentine is a sign of a vital pulp, in some cases root canal treatment is indicated in the long term due to apical periodontitis or pulpitis. Depending on the extent of PCO, root canal treatment may be challenging even for experienced and well‐equipped endodontic specialists. The ‘guided endodontics’ (GE) technique was introduced 6 years ago as an alternative to conventional access cavity preparation for teeth with PCO and apical pathosis or irreversible pulpitis. Using three‐dimensional radiological imaging such as cone‐beam computed tomography and a digital surface scan, an optimal access to the orifice of the calcified root canal can be planned virtually with appropriate software. GE is implemented either with the help of templates analogous to guided implantology (= static navigation) or by means of dynamic navigation based on a camera‐marker system. GE has emerged as a field of research in the last 6 years with very promising laboratory‐based results regarding the accuracy of guided endodontic access cavities for both static and dynamic navigation. Clinical implementation seems to provide favourable results, but the evidence is mainly based on numerous case reports and a few case series. This narrative review aims to provide an update on the present status of GE and to identify relevant research areas that could contribute to further improvements of this technique. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-04 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9790195/ /pubmed/35075661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13687 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Endodontic Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Endodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Connert, Thomas Weiger, Roland Krastl, Gabriel Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics |
title | Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics |
title_full | Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics |
title_fullStr | Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics |
title_full_unstemmed | Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics |
title_short | Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics |
title_sort | present status and future directions – guided endodontics |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35075661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13687 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT connertthomas presentstatusandfuturedirectionsguidedendodontics AT weigerroland presentstatusandfuturedirectionsguidedendodontics AT krastlgabriel presentstatusandfuturedirectionsguidedendodontics |