Cargando…

Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics

Luxation injuries and other stimuli may lead to a pulp canal obliteration (PCO). Even though the apposition of tertiary dentine is a sign of a vital pulp, in some cases root canal treatment is indicated in the long term due to apical periodontitis or pulpitis. Depending on the extent of PCO, root ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Connert, Thomas, Weiger, Roland, Krastl, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35075661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13687
_version_ 1784859121215864832
author Connert, Thomas
Weiger, Roland
Krastl, Gabriel
author_facet Connert, Thomas
Weiger, Roland
Krastl, Gabriel
author_sort Connert, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Luxation injuries and other stimuli may lead to a pulp canal obliteration (PCO). Even though the apposition of tertiary dentine is a sign of a vital pulp, in some cases root canal treatment is indicated in the long term due to apical periodontitis or pulpitis. Depending on the extent of PCO, root canal treatment may be challenging even for experienced and well‐equipped endodontic specialists. The ‘guided endodontics’ (GE) technique was introduced 6 years ago as an alternative to conventional access cavity preparation for teeth with PCO and apical pathosis or irreversible pulpitis. Using three‐dimensional radiological imaging such as cone‐beam computed tomography and a digital surface scan, an optimal access to the orifice of the calcified root canal can be planned virtually with appropriate software. GE is implemented either with the help of templates analogous to guided implantology (= static navigation) or by means of dynamic navigation based on a camera‐marker system. GE has emerged as a field of research in the last 6 years with very promising laboratory‐based results regarding the accuracy of guided endodontic access cavities for both static and dynamic navigation. Clinical implementation seems to provide favourable results, but the evidence is mainly based on numerous case reports and a few case series. This narrative review aims to provide an update on the present status of GE and to identify relevant research areas that could contribute to further improvements of this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9790195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97901952022-12-28 Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics Connert, Thomas Weiger, Roland Krastl, Gabriel Int Endod J Reviews Luxation injuries and other stimuli may lead to a pulp canal obliteration (PCO). Even though the apposition of tertiary dentine is a sign of a vital pulp, in some cases root canal treatment is indicated in the long term due to apical periodontitis or pulpitis. Depending on the extent of PCO, root canal treatment may be challenging even for experienced and well‐equipped endodontic specialists. The ‘guided endodontics’ (GE) technique was introduced 6 years ago as an alternative to conventional access cavity preparation for teeth with PCO and apical pathosis or irreversible pulpitis. Using three‐dimensional radiological imaging such as cone‐beam computed tomography and a digital surface scan, an optimal access to the orifice of the calcified root canal can be planned virtually with appropriate software. GE is implemented either with the help of templates analogous to guided implantology (= static navigation) or by means of dynamic navigation based on a camera‐marker system. GE has emerged as a field of research in the last 6 years with very promising laboratory‐based results regarding the accuracy of guided endodontic access cavities for both static and dynamic navigation. Clinical implementation seems to provide favourable results, but the evidence is mainly based on numerous case reports and a few case series. This narrative review aims to provide an update on the present status of GE and to identify relevant research areas that could contribute to further improvements of this technique. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-04 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9790195/ /pubmed/35075661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13687 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Endodontic Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Endodontic Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Connert, Thomas
Weiger, Roland
Krastl, Gabriel
Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics
title Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics
title_full Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics
title_fullStr Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics
title_full_unstemmed Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics
title_short Present status and future directions – Guided endodontics
title_sort present status and future directions – guided endodontics
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35075661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.13687
work_keys_str_mv AT connertthomas presentstatusandfuturedirectionsguidedendodontics
AT weigerroland presentstatusandfuturedirectionsguidedendodontics
AT krastlgabriel presentstatusandfuturedirectionsguidedendodontics