Cargando…

A multi‐component evaluation framework of a state‐wide preventive health program: My health for life

ISSUE: Chronic disease is a growing problem affecting approximately half of all Australian adults. In response to growing calls for action on chronic disease, the My health for life program was created, aimed at improving the health of individuals at high risk of developing preventable chronic disea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parkinson, Joy, McDonald, Nicole, Seib, Charrlotte, Moriarty, Stephanie, Anderson, Debra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35266220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpja.591
_version_ 1784859143573602304
author Parkinson, Joy
McDonald, Nicole
Seib, Charrlotte
Moriarty, Stephanie
Anderson, Debra
author_facet Parkinson, Joy
McDonald, Nicole
Seib, Charrlotte
Moriarty, Stephanie
Anderson, Debra
author_sort Parkinson, Joy
collection PubMed
description ISSUE: Chronic disease is a growing problem affecting approximately half of all Australian adults. In response to growing calls for action on chronic disease, the My health for life program was created, aimed at improving the health of individuals at high risk of developing preventable chronic disease. The preventive health program is multi‐modal, cross‐culturally tailored and contains complex social marketing, community engagement, risk assessment and health promotion components. Therefore, a multi‐component evaluation framework is essential to understand the effectiveness of the My health for life program. This brief report details the evaluation. METHODS: The evaluation design uses non‐randomised, longitudinal analysis using repeated measures, observational, program goal‐based and pretest‐posttest design features to assess the program, its specific modalities and its program adaptations. To ensure timely and credible evaluation, different evaluative implementation frameworks and methods are considered. Quantitative and qualitative methods collect an array of program data at differing levels to assess the processes, outcomes and impacts of My health for life. DISCUSSION: The implemented evaluation framework has allowed measurement of: (i) process impacts including uptake, retention and attrition, participant satisfaction, fidelity and program stakeholder engagement and (ii) outcomes relating to individual participant level changes in health behaviours. SO WHAT? This evaluation is an example of an integrated evaluation approach in a large successful preventive health program. Findings from the evaluation will ultimately inform the applicability and transferability of the program and inform policy makers, stakeholders and other health professionals in preventive health practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9790295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97902952022-12-28 A multi‐component evaluation framework of a state‐wide preventive health program: My health for life Parkinson, Joy McDonald, Nicole Seib, Charrlotte Moriarty, Stephanie Anderson, Debra Health Promot J Austr Standard Issue ‐ Advancing Health Promotion Practice ISSUE: Chronic disease is a growing problem affecting approximately half of all Australian adults. In response to growing calls for action on chronic disease, the My health for life program was created, aimed at improving the health of individuals at high risk of developing preventable chronic disease. The preventive health program is multi‐modal, cross‐culturally tailored and contains complex social marketing, community engagement, risk assessment and health promotion components. Therefore, a multi‐component evaluation framework is essential to understand the effectiveness of the My health for life program. This brief report details the evaluation. METHODS: The evaluation design uses non‐randomised, longitudinal analysis using repeated measures, observational, program goal‐based and pretest‐posttest design features to assess the program, its specific modalities and its program adaptations. To ensure timely and credible evaluation, different evaluative implementation frameworks and methods are considered. Quantitative and qualitative methods collect an array of program data at differing levels to assess the processes, outcomes and impacts of My health for life. DISCUSSION: The implemented evaluation framework has allowed measurement of: (i) process impacts including uptake, retention and attrition, participant satisfaction, fidelity and program stakeholder engagement and (ii) outcomes relating to individual participant level changes in health behaviours. SO WHAT? This evaluation is an example of an integrated evaluation approach in a large successful preventive health program. Findings from the evaluation will ultimately inform the applicability and transferability of the program and inform policy makers, stakeholders and other health professionals in preventive health practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-15 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9790295/ /pubmed/35266220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpja.591 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Promotion Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Health Promotion Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Standard Issue ‐ Advancing Health Promotion Practice
Parkinson, Joy
McDonald, Nicole
Seib, Charrlotte
Moriarty, Stephanie
Anderson, Debra
A multi‐component evaluation framework of a state‐wide preventive health program: My health for life
title A multi‐component evaluation framework of a state‐wide preventive health program: My health for life
title_full A multi‐component evaluation framework of a state‐wide preventive health program: My health for life
title_fullStr A multi‐component evaluation framework of a state‐wide preventive health program: My health for life
title_full_unstemmed A multi‐component evaluation framework of a state‐wide preventive health program: My health for life
title_short A multi‐component evaluation framework of a state‐wide preventive health program: My health for life
title_sort multi‐component evaluation framework of a state‐wide preventive health program: my health for life
topic Standard Issue ‐ Advancing Health Promotion Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35266220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpja.591
work_keys_str_mv AT parkinsonjoy amulticomponentevaluationframeworkofastatewidepreventivehealthprogrammyhealthforlife
AT mcdonaldnicole amulticomponentevaluationframeworkofastatewidepreventivehealthprogrammyhealthforlife
AT seibcharrlotte amulticomponentevaluationframeworkofastatewidepreventivehealthprogrammyhealthforlife
AT moriartystephanie amulticomponentevaluationframeworkofastatewidepreventivehealthprogrammyhealthforlife
AT andersondebra amulticomponentevaluationframeworkofastatewidepreventivehealthprogrammyhealthforlife
AT parkinsonjoy multicomponentevaluationframeworkofastatewidepreventivehealthprogrammyhealthforlife
AT mcdonaldnicole multicomponentevaluationframeworkofastatewidepreventivehealthprogrammyhealthforlife
AT seibcharrlotte multicomponentevaluationframeworkofastatewidepreventivehealthprogrammyhealthforlife
AT moriartystephanie multicomponentevaluationframeworkofastatewidepreventivehealthprogrammyhealthforlife
AT andersondebra multicomponentevaluationframeworkofastatewidepreventivehealthprogrammyhealthforlife