Cargando…
Blood biomarkers in epilepsy
Robust and accessible biomarkers are greatly needed in epilepsy. Diagnostic and prognostic precision in the clinic needs to improve, and there is a need for objective quantification of seizure burden. In recent years, there have been advances in the development of accessible and cost‐effective blood...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13616 |
_version_ | 1784859144549826560 |
---|---|
author | Banote, Rakesh Kumar Akel, Sarah Zelano, Johan |
author_facet | Banote, Rakesh Kumar Akel, Sarah Zelano, Johan |
author_sort | Banote, Rakesh Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Robust and accessible biomarkers are greatly needed in epilepsy. Diagnostic and prognostic precision in the clinic needs to improve, and there is a need for objective quantification of seizure burden. In recent years, there have been advances in the development of accessible and cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers in neurology, and these are increasingly studied in epilepsy. However, the field is in its infancy and specificity and sensitivity for most biomarkers in most clinical situations are not known. This review describes advancements regarding human blood biomarkers in epilepsy. Examples of biochemical markers that have been shown to have higher blood concentrations in study subjects with epilepsy include brain proteins like S100B or neuronal specific enolase, and neuroinflammatory proteins like interleukins, and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha. Some of the blood biomarkers also seem to reflect seizure duration or frequency, and levels decrease in response to treatment with antiseizure medication. For most biomarkers, the literature contains seemingly conflicting results. This is to be expected in an emerging field and could reflect different study populations, sampling or analysis techniques, and epilepsy classification. More studies are needed with emphasis put on the classification of epilepsy and seizure types. More standardized reporting could perhaps decrease result heterogeneity and increase the potential for data sharing and subgroup analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9790299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97902992022-12-28 Blood biomarkers in epilepsy Banote, Rakesh Kumar Akel, Sarah Zelano, Johan Acta Neurol Scand Review Articles Robust and accessible biomarkers are greatly needed in epilepsy. Diagnostic and prognostic precision in the clinic needs to improve, and there is a need for objective quantification of seizure burden. In recent years, there have been advances in the development of accessible and cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers in neurology, and these are increasingly studied in epilepsy. However, the field is in its infancy and specificity and sensitivity for most biomarkers in most clinical situations are not known. This review describes advancements regarding human blood biomarkers in epilepsy. Examples of biochemical markers that have been shown to have higher blood concentrations in study subjects with epilepsy include brain proteins like S100B or neuronal specific enolase, and neuroinflammatory proteins like interleukins, and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha. Some of the blood biomarkers also seem to reflect seizure duration or frequency, and levels decrease in response to treatment with antiseizure medication. For most biomarkers, the literature contains seemingly conflicting results. This is to be expected in an emerging field and could reflect different study populations, sampling or analysis techniques, and epilepsy classification. More studies are needed with emphasis put on the classification of epilepsy and seizure types. More standardized reporting could perhaps decrease result heterogeneity and increase the potential for data sharing and subgroup analyses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-11 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9790299/ /pubmed/35411571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13616 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Banote, Rakesh Kumar Akel, Sarah Zelano, Johan Blood biomarkers in epilepsy |
title | Blood biomarkers in epilepsy |
title_full | Blood biomarkers in epilepsy |
title_fullStr | Blood biomarkers in epilepsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Blood biomarkers in epilepsy |
title_short | Blood biomarkers in epilepsy |
title_sort | blood biomarkers in epilepsy |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13616 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banoterakeshkumar bloodbiomarkersinepilepsy AT akelsarah bloodbiomarkersinepilepsy AT zelanojohan bloodbiomarkersinepilepsy |