Cargando…

Blood biomarkers in epilepsy

Robust and accessible biomarkers are greatly needed in epilepsy. Diagnostic and prognostic precision in the clinic needs to improve, and there is a need for objective quantification of seizure burden. In recent years, there have been advances in the development of accessible and cost‐effective blood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banote, Rakesh Kumar, Akel, Sarah, Zelano, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13616
_version_ 1784859144549826560
author Banote, Rakesh Kumar
Akel, Sarah
Zelano, Johan
author_facet Banote, Rakesh Kumar
Akel, Sarah
Zelano, Johan
author_sort Banote, Rakesh Kumar
collection PubMed
description Robust and accessible biomarkers are greatly needed in epilepsy. Diagnostic and prognostic precision in the clinic needs to improve, and there is a need for objective quantification of seizure burden. In recent years, there have been advances in the development of accessible and cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers in neurology, and these are increasingly studied in epilepsy. However, the field is in its infancy and specificity and sensitivity for most biomarkers in most clinical situations are not known. This review describes advancements regarding human blood biomarkers in epilepsy. Examples of biochemical markers that have been shown to have higher blood concentrations in study subjects with epilepsy include brain proteins like S100B or neuronal specific enolase, and neuroinflammatory proteins like interleukins, and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha. Some of the blood biomarkers also seem to reflect seizure duration or frequency, and levels decrease in response to treatment with antiseizure medication. For most biomarkers, the literature contains seemingly conflicting results. This is to be expected in an emerging field and could reflect different study populations, sampling or analysis techniques, and epilepsy classification. More studies are needed with emphasis put on the classification of epilepsy and seizure types. More standardized reporting could perhaps decrease result heterogeneity and increase the potential for data sharing and subgroup analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9790299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97902992022-12-28 Blood biomarkers in epilepsy Banote, Rakesh Kumar Akel, Sarah Zelano, Johan Acta Neurol Scand Review Articles Robust and accessible biomarkers are greatly needed in epilepsy. Diagnostic and prognostic precision in the clinic needs to improve, and there is a need for objective quantification of seizure burden. In recent years, there have been advances in the development of accessible and cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers in neurology, and these are increasingly studied in epilepsy. However, the field is in its infancy and specificity and sensitivity for most biomarkers in most clinical situations are not known. This review describes advancements regarding human blood biomarkers in epilepsy. Examples of biochemical markers that have been shown to have higher blood concentrations in study subjects with epilepsy include brain proteins like S100B or neuronal specific enolase, and neuroinflammatory proteins like interleukins, and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha. Some of the blood biomarkers also seem to reflect seizure duration or frequency, and levels decrease in response to treatment with antiseizure medication. For most biomarkers, the literature contains seemingly conflicting results. This is to be expected in an emerging field and could reflect different study populations, sampling or analysis techniques, and epilepsy classification. More studies are needed with emphasis put on the classification of epilepsy and seizure types. More standardized reporting could perhaps decrease result heterogeneity and increase the potential for data sharing and subgroup analyses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-11 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9790299/ /pubmed/35411571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13616 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Banote, Rakesh Kumar
Akel, Sarah
Zelano, Johan
Blood biomarkers in epilepsy
title Blood biomarkers in epilepsy
title_full Blood biomarkers in epilepsy
title_fullStr Blood biomarkers in epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Blood biomarkers in epilepsy
title_short Blood biomarkers in epilepsy
title_sort blood biomarkers in epilepsy
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9790299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ane.13616
work_keys_str_mv AT banoterakeshkumar bloodbiomarkersinepilepsy
AT akelsarah bloodbiomarkersinepilepsy
AT zelanojohan bloodbiomarkersinepilepsy